Britain’s EU dilemma

Britain’s EU dilemma

Europe is once again divided between East and West — only this time the fault line runs through the European Union. The eastern members are clinging fast to the EU in the face of Russian aggression. At the other geographic and political extreme, the United Kingdom is threatening to walk out on Europe for good. Decisions being taken today on Europe’s eastern and western peripheries are likely to shape a new balance of power.
It is not difficult to imagine Europe after a British withdrawal: A French-German axis in control, Russia empowered, America bypassing a now-weakened Britain, pro-EU Scotland threatening once again to leave the UK, and England turning inward as Euroskeptics convince themselves that Britain always is strongest when alone.
And, given the effects of UK Euroskepticism so far, no crystal ball is needed to foresee the impact on Britain of withdrawal from the EU. As former European Commission President José Manuel Barroso put it in December, “I’ve never seen in all my years in the European Council…a big country as isolated as Britain.”
Indeed, the UK is now a fringe player in deciding a European growth strategy; marginal to trade debates that it used to lead; and, despite being a big lender, almost irrelevant to the future of Greece. And now, though Britain was a signatory of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum guaranteeing Ukrainian independence, only France and Germany attend any serious negotiations. British ministers want it both ways: “Russia must be countered by even greater European unity,” they say. “But, by the way, we may be leaving.”
The price of exit would be enormous, putting at risk three million jobs, 25,000 companies, annual exports worth £200 billion and £450 billion of inward investment. Moreover, London’s unique role in bringing together the full range of financial services that serve the continent would be jeopardized as well.
There is little evidence to support the anti-Europeans’ argument that EU regulations hobble British trade outside of Europe; on the contrary, substantial extra-EU trade and investment opportunities would be lost were Britain to leave. And their claim that a non-European Britain could effortlessly retain the EU’s benefits while ditching its burdens is simply not credible.
Consider the Euroskeptics’ favorite examples, Norway and Switzerland. The Norwegians must pay $2.1 billion a year for access to European markets. Switzerland, like Norway, must take a back seat to the EU Commission when trade and investment decisions are made.
The world’s largest economy, the United States, needs the North American Free Trade Agreement, and Southeast Asia’s rising economies need ASEAN.
EU membership strengthens the UK’s competitiveness by enabling it to negotiate the best deals on trade, tax rules, patents, money laundering, corruption, and security with China, India, and the rest of the world.
But economic arguments alone will likely not be enough to persuade a Britain that, in the late journalist and political columnist Hugo Young’s words, is caught between the past it cannot forget and the future it cannot avoid.
Nonetheless, economic insecurity — owing to the rapid pace and, at times, destructiveness of the global economy — evidently is driving much of the public’s nostalgia for British sovereignty.
This fear has found its voice in the anti-European UK Independence Party, which has risen in opinion polls by converting economic discontent into a culture war in which foreigners and immigrants — and, indeed, Europe as a whole — are the enemy. Britain, UKIP’s leaders and supporters believe, is not the Britain they once knew.
What needs to be said is this: Britain is at its best when it sees itself as a leader in Europe. Just as Britain once led Europe in fighting fascism, supporting democratic aspirations, and charting the continent’s response to the global recession of 2008, it should be inside Europe leading from the front ranks.
The Britain that has always championed liberty, tolerance and social responsibility should be ready once again to lead a progressive movement, spearheading action to fight climate change, resist protectionism and encourage sustainable growth. Globalization needs a human face, and the face of modern Britain can provide it.
Some say that the best way to secure European reform is to threaten to leave. My experience is that Britain does best when it works to bring people together, set the agenda, promote its values, and champion change. It is then that Britain can channel its unforgettable past while embracing its unavoidable future.

©Project Syndicate
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view