All eyes on FBI chief as Russia, wiretap claims swirl
All eyes on FBI chief as Russia, wiretap claims swirl
The two explosive issues have preoccupied Republicans and Democrats alike for weeks, robbing Trump’s administration of a smoother rollout and raising uncomfortable questions about possible collusion between Trump associates and the Kremlin. The stakes for the tycoon-turned-world-leader could hardly be higher.
Comey will testify before the House Intelligence Committee at an open hearing aimed at investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election campaign.
National Security Agency director Mike Rogers is also scheduled to testify.
The US intelligence community has publicly blamed Moscow for hacks of the Democratic National Committee last year, and suggested the cyberattacks were aimed at steering the election to a Trump victory.
Russia has denied involvement in the hacks.
Several congressional panels have launched investigations into Russia’s alleged interference, including House and Senate intelligence committees, which have jurisdiction over the nation’s 17 intelligence agencies, and the House and Senate judiciary committees.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is also probing Russian interference in the election.
The question remains whether the agency has opened a criminal investigation into possible ties between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials.
Monday’s hearing promises to be a very public showdown between the FBI and lawmakers, with the national security world certain to watch whether Comey drops a political bombshell on Washington.
Members of Congress have expressed mounting frustration over the lack of cooperation from the FBI about Russia and Trump’s incendiary wiretap claim, which Barack Obama and an array of other officials have flatly denied.
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican, vented his anger at the Justice Department, which oversees the FBI, by threatening not to hold a vote on Trump’s nominee for deputy attorney general until he gets answers from Comey.
The FBI director then trooped up to Capitol Hill on Wednesday to brief Grassley and the judiciary panel’s top Democrat, Senator Dianne Feinstein, behind closed doors.
The information discussed was “highly classified,” Feinstein told reporters afterward.
“It’s really not anything that we can answer any questions about.”
Representative Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Friday that the Justice Department had “fully complied” with the panel’s request for any materials related to Trump’s wiretapping claim. He would not disclose what was provided.
But Representative Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said that he had yet to see any evidence of wiretapping. If the White House has any, he added on CNN, “Please share it with us.”
Trump has denounced the tumult over the Russia connections as a “total witch hunt.”
The issue mushroomed last month when Trump’s national security adviser Michael Flynn resigned after it was revealed he misled top officials over his contacts with Russia.
Around the same time, The New York Times reported that US intelligence agents had intercepted calls showing that members of Trump’s campaign had repeated contacts with top Russian intelligence officials in the year preceding the November 8 election.
Adding to the intrigue, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from any Russia-related inquiries after it was learned that he had met twice with the Russian ambassador in the months before Trump took office.
Top officials from both parties have discredited Trump’s wiretapping allegation. House Speaker Paul Ryan, as well as the chairmen and top Democrats on the House and Senate intelligence committees, have said they have seen no evidence to back the claim.
In a BBC interview published Saturday, National Security Agency deputy Rick Ledgett called the suggestion — which a White House spokesman conveyed to reporters — that British intelligence might have helped spy on Trump “just crazy.” British officials have vigorously denounced the allegation.
Still, Trump doubled down on his assertion Friday.
Speaking at a joint news conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, he answered a question about the wiretap allegation by referring to the National Security Agency’s reported tapping of Merkel’s phone years ago.
“As far as wiretapping, I guess, by this past administration, at least we have something in common perhaps,” Trump said.
Bangladesh declares zero tolerance against drug dealers
- Law enforcers have so far arrested 3,000 drug dealers, while 23 drug peddlers were killed during “gunfights” while they were being captured.
- Human rights activists and the country’s largest opposition party the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) have criticized the “gunfight” incidents as a “violation of human rights.”
DHAKA: Bangladesh has declared a war on drugs throughout the country. In the past 12 days around 84 alleged drug dealers were killed during gunfights with the law-enforcing agencies.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina launched the anti-narcotic drive in early May.
Human rights activists and the country’s largest opposition party the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) have criticized the “gunfight” incidents as a “violation of human rights.”
On early Sunday, 11 drug dealers were killed in separate gunfight incidents throughout the country. Among the dead was a ruling party leader who was a city councilor in Cox’s Bazar City.
The Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), a paramilitary law-enforcing agency, started its anti-narcotic movement on May 4. And it has so far arrested 3,000 drug dealers, while 23 drug peddlers were killed during “gunfights” while they were being captured.
Commander Mufti Mahmud Khan, spokesperson of the RAB, told Arab News: “There is no question of violation of human rights in our ongoing war against drugs.”
He said that when the RAB captured any armed person or group generally some shootout incidents took place. And, he claimed, it also happens in the US and other developed countries. “We arrest the drug dealers based on intel information and later on they are produced to the court.”
Bangladesh Police started its all-out operation against drugs on May 15, and police headquarters has directed all its units to start countrywide operations against dealers.
Mohammad Masudur Rahman, deputy commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police, said: “Our anti-narcotic operations will continue till the situations come down to a tolerant level.” He said the only objective of this operation was to bring down the usage level of narcotics in society.
Justifying the anti-drug movement, Masudur added: “We only arrest the persons with whom we get drugs. And we will continue this movement for an indefinite period.”
Obaidul Quader, general secretary of ruling party Bangladesh Awami League, said: “Any drug trader, irrespective of party, won’t be spared if accusations become true.
“The countrymen have amicably welcomed the law enforcement agencies’ drives against narcotics. Only those with evil political intentions are criticizing the crackdown,” Quader told local media on Saturday.
But Advocate Asadujjaman, human rights secretary of the BNP, claimed that in many areas of the country their supporters and leaders were arrested in the name of the anti-drug movement.
He added: “Any kind of extrajudicial killing is unconstitutional, illegal, inhuman and a violation of human rights of international standard. It shows that the government is not showing any respect to protect the basic rights of the people as stated in the Constitution.”
The country’s human rights group is also criticizing the killings. Nur Khan, renowned human rights activist and adviser of the Human Rights Support Society, demanded an investigation into every extrajudicial killing through a neutral and credible Investigation Commission.
Nur said: “This type of extrajudicial killing will establish the culture of absence of justice in the society. People will get frightened due to this situation.”