ICC chief puts positive spin to Olympic slot
ICC chief puts positive spin to Olympic slot
The 57-year-old South African — who was the national side’s wicketkeeper for seven years when they were welcomed back into the international arena in the 1990’s — said that added exposure in the Olympics would help to globalize the game.
“I think a majority of the (ICC) members and certainly myself think the time is right,” Richardson told a small group of journalists after speaking at the SportsPro Live conference in London.
“I think we have come to the conclusion the overall benefit to globalize it and grow the game will outweigh any negatives.
“We need to make a decision I would guess by July this year because I believe the IOC will in September be considering new sports for 2024.”
Appropriately one of the two remaining candidates to host the 2024 global sporting extravaganza is Paris where cricket was last played at a Games in 1900 — Great Britain beating the only other entrant France by 158 runs.
“Neither Los Angeles and Paris would be disasters and and each might hold opportunities for us, especially the United States option,” said Richardson.
“In Europe, too, it would be good although we would have to spend a bit more on cricket pitches in France than the US but it’s not impossible.”
Richardson, who has been in his post since June 2012, admitted the scheduling, especially if held in Paris, would be the biggest challenge.
“From an ICC perspective the most challenging part is the scheduling as the Olympic Games is normally held in the Northern Hemisphere summer,” said Richardson.
“It could be a problem for England, who for instance wouldn’t want to send their best players during an Ashes series and they have raised that concern in the past.”
That could be problematic as one of the IOC’s stipulations to sports wishing to gain entry is that the best players turn up — golf’s return to the Games last year was marred with several of the top stars withdrawing.
Richardson, though, says the ICC can ensure the best do turn up.
“To some extent you can control that,” he said.
“In the participation agreements there is a clause that all the best available players must be selected.”
Richardson, a qualified lawyer, said the IOC had not said whether a sport from the present roster would have to be removed if cricket was to be admitted.
“When taking any decison to admit any new sport the IOC has to take into account a limitation on the number of athletes,” he said.
“Cricket, being a team sport, could not cater for more than six to eight teams and we must not send a beach cricket team or a six a side team. It must be in a format played at international level.”
Richardson, who said there would be regional qualifying and finals and then an Olympic qualifier, said Twenty20 would be the perfect fit.
“Twenty20 is the ideal format and would be even better than (rugby) sevens, we would say, as it is one of the mainstream formats of cricket,” he said.
Richardson doesn’t believe the fact neither the West Indies nor England could send a team would be a problem.
“The countries who make up the West Indies haven’t raised it as an issue and similarly England, well they could include a Scotsman and an Irishman.
“I don’t think that it will be an issue.
“As there are only going to be six or eight teams it is unlikely teams like Barbados and Jamaica would qualify.”
Ahmed defends Pakistan squad as ‘best of the best’
- Fawad Alam is a seasoned player, but the players we selected are also equally good and have been scoring continuously as well, says Pakistani skipper
- Former test opener Ramiz Raja claims there are flaws in Alam’s batting technique
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan captain Sarfraz Ahmed has defended the 16-man national squad for tours of Ireland and England as the “best of the best” despite criticism over the omission of batsman Fawad Alam.
“It’s not like I voted him (Alam) out,” Ahmed said on the last day of Pakistan’s training camp in Lahore on Saturday, adding that “I would have picked all the 25 ... but we had to pick the best of the best 16 players.”
Wasim Akram was among several former Pakistan test players who have criticized selectors for ignoring Alam in the middle order — especially since Misbah-ul-Haq and Younis Khan have now retired.
Alam was among 25 players called up for the camp after scoring consistently on the domestic circuit, but he failed to make the final squad.
Former test opener Ramiz Raja claimed there were flaws in Alam’s batting technique and that he would not have considered the left-hander, considering the tough conditions in England.
Ahmed played down the dispute.
“People can make as much reasons to talk, but there is nothing like flaws in anyone’s batting technique,” Ahmed said. “If you look back, Fawad had played a test in 2009 and he is a seasoned player ... (but) the players we selected are also equally good and have been scoring continuously as well.”
Ahmed said it had been a “unanimous decision” by coach, captain and selectors.
Pakistan has included uncapped batsmen Usman Salahuddin and Saad Ali in the final 16, as well as Fakhar Zaman, who has done well in limited-overs cricket but is yet to play a test match.
Misbah and Younis will be missed on a tour of England where Misbah scored a century at Lord’s in 2016 and Younis made 218 at The Oval in the fourth test to draw the series 2-2.
Pakistan has two four-day matches against Kent and Northamptonshire before meeting Ireland in a one-off test at Dublin, starting May 11. It plays two tests against England, starting May 24.
Pakistan will also play Scotland on June 12-13 in two Twenty20 Internationals.
Pakistan faced a major blow when its premier legspinner Yasir Shah was ruled out due to injury. However, Ahmed said he wasn’t sure that Shadab Khan, who has played just one test match, would make it to the final team with the English conditions more suitable for pace.
“The weather will be much cooler and I am not even sure if we are going to play a spinner,” Ahmed said.