Kurd disarray highlights Iraq army’s newfound prowess

Children fleeing violence in the northern Kirkuk province sit inside a shelter at the Bahrka refugee camp, 10 km west of Irbil, capital of the Kurdish autonomous region. (AFP)
Updated 21 October 2017
0

Kurd disarray highlights Iraq army’s newfound prowess

BAGHDAD: The speed with which Iraqi troops this week overwhelmed Kurdish forces in Kirkuk, days after ousting Daesh, marks a radical change in the balance of power, analysts say.
For 14 years since the US-led invasion, the Kurds had taken advantage of the weakness of the federal army to slowly chip away at territory they had long claimed outside their autonomous region in northern Iraq.
But in a lightning operation this week, Baghdad’s forces swept through almost all of the territory the Kurds had gained, including Kirkuk’s key oil fields, virtually confining them to their original three provinces.
The Kurds’ precipitous withdrawal from thousands of square kilometers of cherished territory highlighted the newfound prowess of the Iraqi army — rearmed, retrained and battle-hardened during three years of fighting against Daesh.
US-led coalition Col. Ryan Dillon said federal government forces had proven their mettle in the nine-month battle for |Iraq’s second city Mosul that culminated in Daesh’s defeat in July.
He said it had been “some of the most difficult combat fighting ... in decades,” and had proven that the army was a “very capable fighting force.”
“Some have even said that they are one of the premier security forces now in the region.”
But it has been a long road back.
Humiliated in the US-led invasion of 2003, Iraq’s army was then disbanded by the occupation administration, which branded it a symbol of the repression of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
The new army that the coalition slowly formed was dogged by the problem of “ghost soldiers” who existed only on paper and who auditors found made up more than half of its payroll.
Its failings became all too clear when Daesh terrorists swept through northern and western Iraq in 2014 seizing a third of the country.
Seven army divisions simply collapsed — their soldiers discarding their weapons and uniforms, and abandoning their positions in the cities of Mosul, Tikrit, Kirkuk and Ramadi.
“In 2014, the Iraqi armed forces suffered from weak morale, corrupt and nepotistic leadership, and lack of purpose,” said Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for Middle East security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
“The massive reforms undertaken since ... as well as a massive US effort to arm and support the Iraqi security forces, have generated a more disciplined and more cohesive force that has shown military ability across the battlefield.”
New Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi secured the return of Western military trainers and advisers who had left in 2011.
Since 2015, they have trained 119,000 security personnel, according to the US-led coalition. Those have included 43,900 federal troops, 20,700 federal police and 14,400 elite Counter-Terrorism Service members.
Jeremy Binnie, Middle East and Africa editor at Jane’s Defense Weekly, said the federal armed forces had obviously benefited from the huge Western investment in training.
“At the same time, the Iraqis have probably made some improvements in terms of the Iraqis addressing key problems such as corruption, poor logistics and low morale.”
The Kurdish Peshmerga too have received Western training — some 22,800 of them — but they have not had the same level of battlefield experience as federal forces during the fightback against Daesh.
Despite their once fearsome reputation as hardened guerrilla fighters, the Peshmerga did not play a leading role in the campaign.
They did not take part in the battle for Mosul, halting their advance some 30 km east of the Daesh bastion.
Nor did they take part in last month’s recapture of Hawija, the last town in Kirkuk province held by Daesh.
Hokayem said the Kurds had also been plagued by a divided political leadership, which had taken opposing sides over the fateful decision to hold last month’s independence referendum that triggered Baghdad’s punishing riposte.
“The Peshmerga were not defeated militarily; instead they collapsed because of their fragmentation and lack of political cohesion,” he said.


Extremists kill 9 Syria regime fighters near Idlib: monitor

Updated 16 November 2018
0

Extremists kill 9 Syria regime fighters near Idlib: monitor

  • Syria’s war has killed more than 360,000 people since it erupted in 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-government protests
  • Extremist groups attacked government forces in the northwest of Hama province near a planned buffer zone

BEIRUT: Extremists on Friday killed nine Syrian regime fighters near a planned buffer zone around the country’s last major rebel bastion, a monitor said.
A September deal between government ally Russia and opposition backer Turkey aimed to set up a de-militarised zone around the northwestern region of Idlib to protect it from a regime assault.
But its implementation has been stalled since extremists who hold around 70 percent of the planned buffer area failed to withdraw by mid-October, and sporadic clashes have rocked the area since.
Early Friday, extremist groups attacked government forces in the northwest of Hama province near the planned buffer zone, the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.
“Nine regime fighters and five assailants were killed” in the attack, causing government forces to respond with artillery fire, Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman said.
The attackers included the Al-Qaeda-linked Hurras Al-Deen group, which has publicly rejected the Russian-Turkish deal, he said.
The lion’s share of Idlib is held by Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, an alliance led by Al-Qaeda’s former Syrian affiliate.
Under the September 17 deal, all fighters in the zone were supposed to withdraw their heavy weapons and militants including HTS and Hurras Al-Deen were supposed to leave.
On Thursday, Russian spokeswoman Maria Zakharova criticized “sporadic clashes,” as well as “provocations” by HTS in northwestern Syria.
Late last month, Syria’s Foreign Minister Walid Muallem expressed dissatisfaction with the implementation of the Idlib deal, and criticized Turkey for shortcomings.
He said heavy weapons had not been withdrawn and accused Turkey of not wanting to “respect its obligations.”
Syria’s war has killed more than 360,000 people since it erupted in 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-government protests.