Kurd disarray highlights Iraq army’s newfound prowess

Children fleeing violence in the northern Kirkuk province sit inside a shelter at the Bahrka refugee camp, 10 km west of Irbil, capital of the Kurdish autonomous region. (AFP)
Updated 21 October 2017

Kurd disarray highlights Iraq army’s newfound prowess

BAGHDAD: The speed with which Iraqi troops this week overwhelmed Kurdish forces in Kirkuk, days after ousting Daesh, marks a radical change in the balance of power, analysts say.
For 14 years since the US-led invasion, the Kurds had taken advantage of the weakness of the federal army to slowly chip away at territory they had long claimed outside their autonomous region in northern Iraq.
But in a lightning operation this week, Baghdad’s forces swept through almost all of the territory the Kurds had gained, including Kirkuk’s key oil fields, virtually confining them to their original three provinces.
The Kurds’ precipitous withdrawal from thousands of square kilometers of cherished territory highlighted the newfound prowess of the Iraqi army — rearmed, retrained and battle-hardened during three years of fighting against Daesh.
US-led coalition Col. Ryan Dillon said federal government forces had proven their mettle in the nine-month battle for |Iraq’s second city Mosul that culminated in Daesh’s defeat in July.
He said it had been “some of the most difficult combat fighting ... in decades,” and had proven that the army was a “very capable fighting force.”
“Some have even said that they are one of the premier security forces now in the region.”
But it has been a long road back.
Humiliated in the US-led invasion of 2003, Iraq’s army was then disbanded by the occupation administration, which branded it a symbol of the repression of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
The new army that the coalition slowly formed was dogged by the problem of “ghost soldiers” who existed only on paper and who auditors found made up more than half of its payroll.
Its failings became all too clear when Daesh terrorists swept through northern and western Iraq in 2014 seizing a third of the country.
Seven army divisions simply collapsed — their soldiers discarding their weapons and uniforms, and abandoning their positions in the cities of Mosul, Tikrit, Kirkuk and Ramadi.
“In 2014, the Iraqi armed forces suffered from weak morale, corrupt and nepotistic leadership, and lack of purpose,” said Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for Middle East security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
“The massive reforms undertaken since ... as well as a massive US effort to arm and support the Iraqi security forces, have generated a more disciplined and more cohesive force that has shown military ability across the battlefield.”
New Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi secured the return of Western military trainers and advisers who had left in 2011.
Since 2015, they have trained 119,000 security personnel, according to the US-led coalition. Those have included 43,900 federal troops, 20,700 federal police and 14,400 elite Counter-Terrorism Service members.
Jeremy Binnie, Middle East and Africa editor at Jane’s Defense Weekly, said the federal armed forces had obviously benefited from the huge Western investment in training.
“At the same time, the Iraqis have probably made some improvements in terms of the Iraqis addressing key problems such as corruption, poor logistics and low morale.”
The Kurdish Peshmerga too have received Western training — some 22,800 of them — but they have not had the same level of battlefield experience as federal forces during the fightback against Daesh.
Despite their once fearsome reputation as hardened guerrilla fighters, the Peshmerga did not play a leading role in the campaign.
They did not take part in the battle for Mosul, halting their advance some 30 km east of the Daesh bastion.
Nor did they take part in last month’s recapture of Hawija, the last town in Kirkuk province held by Daesh.
Hokayem said the Kurds had also been plagued by a divided political leadership, which had taken opposing sides over the fateful decision to hold last month’s independence referendum that triggered Baghdad’s punishing riposte.
“The Peshmerga were not defeated militarily; instead they collapsed because of their fragmentation and lack of political cohesion,” he said.

Berlin backs Macron’s Iran plan

In our view this agreement should be maintained, Merkel said. (AFP)
Updated 27 April 2018

Berlin backs Macron’s Iran plan

  • Merkel will discuss Iran with Trump on a visit on Friday
  • Macron acknowledged that he does not know what Trump will decide

BERLIN, PARIS: Proposals presented by French President Emmanuel Macron on Iran’s nuclear deal are based on the existing international agreement but would add some new elements, a senior German official said on Thursday.

Speaking before Chancellor Angela Merkel heads to Washington for talks with US President Donald Trump, the official said: “The premise of Macron’s proposal is that the agreement remains in its existing form and additional elements come on top.” The official added: “In our view this agreement should be maintained.”

Trump has said he is not happy with the 2015 accord and may pull out of it. 

Iran’s President Hasan Rouhani insisted the deal cannot be changed or built on. 

The plan announced during Macron’s trip is part of European efforts to persuade Trump not to abandon the accord next month.

Merkel will discuss Iran with Trump on a visit on Friday.

The French president has meanwhile defended discussions with Trump for a new plan to curb Iranian nuclear weapons. Speaking to reporters before leaving Washington on Wednesday night, Macron said the new four-pronged agreement would be a “very important complement” to the existing 2015 accord.

Macron insisted on the importance of talking to all sides, including Iran ally Russia, and said the world should not force anything on Iran. He acknowledged that he does not know what Trump will decide.