Hilltop tribe’s bitterness a challenge for Libya peace effort

A Libyan man walks toward a damaged hotel in the city of Bani Walid, Libya. It was hit during the NATO-backed campaign in 2011. (Reuters)
Updated 09 November 2017

Hilltop tribe’s bitterness a challenge for Libya peace effort

BANI WALID, Libya: Elders of a powerful tribe that defended the regime of former leader Muammar Qaddafi have a message for the UN as it tries to broker peace in Libya — talk to us or you will fail.
The UN launched a new round of negotiations in September to unite a country that splintered along political, ideological and tribal lines during and after the 2011 uprising that unseated Qaddafi.
Western officials hope the talks will pave the way for elections next year and produce a functioning government that could curb militant activity, tackle migrant smuggling and stabilize the nation’s rapidly deteriorating economy.
But conversations with the robed elders of the Warfalla tribe at their meeting in a hall in the former Qaddafi stronghold of Bani Walid show how difficult that will be.
Located 145km southeast of Tripoli, the isolated hilltop town did not accept the fall of Qaddafi in 2011 and held out against rebels two months longer than the capital.
“We are for dialogue... but the UN has never contacted us,” said Muftah Eftais, leader of the council of elders.
Winning over losers of the 2011 revolution will be key to stabilizing the North African country. The Warfalla account for 1.5 million out of six million Libyans, according to the elders council.
“We are represented in all regions. If the UN wants a solution for Libya you need to talk (to us) the tribes,” said Eftais, drawing words of support from the assembled tribesmen.
The UN Libya office said its envoy, Ghassan Salame, met a group of Libyan notables including a Warfalla representative from Bani Walid in late October, and that other members of the UN mission had been in touch with town officials on political, human rights, humanitarian and economic matters.
At least two Warfalla delegates have also taken part in the latest talks in Tunis, a UN official said, but Eftais said the elders did not feel represented by them, highlighting Libya’s multi-layered divisions.
‘We were in paradise’
Bani Walid residents express their loyalty to the old regime much more openly than they did on a Reuters visit to the town in 2014.
In the main square a Qaddafi-era green flag is hoisted next to pictures of “martyrs” killed in the 2011 violence and subsequent fighting.
The elders govern Bani Walid and control their own armed force, in the absence of any national authority or army. Asked if life was better under Qaddafi, several exclaimed: “We were in paradise.”
Cut off from Tripoli, they said their town has suffered even more than others from late public salary payments that have left people across the country struggling to get by, and from what they say are arbitrary detentions for their support of Qaddafi.
“None of us 60 elders have been to Tripoli since 2011 because we fear getting arrested,” Eftais said.
Two elders died in an ambush by unidentified gun men on the way home from peace talks in a town west of Bani Walid.
Some say claims of isolation and discrimination are exaggerated.
“The problem with Bani Walid is that they sided with Qaddafi and Qaddafi lost, and they can’t live with that,” said Abdulrahman Swehli, the head Tripoli’s High State Council who is from the rival town of Misrata.
‘Musical chairs’
Economic troubles have deepened in Libya since 2014, when a battle for the capital led to rival parliaments and governments being set up in Tripoli and the east.
A 2015 agreement sought to unite the two camps but instead created a third, UN-selected government, led by Prime Minister Fayez Seraj. It has struggled to make an impact after failing to win approval from military commander Khalifa Haftar, the dominant figure in eastern Libya.
The new UN talks, held in Tunis, were suspended last month as neither side could agree on what role Haftar should play. He is said to have presidential ambitions but is a divisive figure.
The Bani Walid elders say they do not support either camp.
“We are neither with Seraj nor with Haftar. Since 2011 the same people have been... in the GNC (Parliament), government, playing musical chairs,” said Eftais.
The elders want the talks to take place in Libya, under the supervision of Libyans.
After negotiations between rival parliaments, the UN says it is planning a “national conference” that would gather hundreds of representatives from across Libya and make any deal as inclusive as possible, bridging deep communal rifts.
Bani Walid’s enmity with Misrata, a wealthy port city 125 km to the northeast, shows how deep such divisions can run.
Historical hostility between two communities that fought in the early 20th century was reignited when Misrata was shelled for weeks by Qaddafi forces in 2011.
The following year, Bani Walid was attacked by fighters from Misrata and other towns, who daubed slogans on the walls that can still be seen today.
In 2014, Misratans became the dominant force in Tripoli and the main source of military opposition to Haftar.
But Misratan extremist armed groups have been sidelined, while Haftar has managed to consolidate power in the east with help from tribal allies and foreign backers including Egypt and the UAE.
As in other towns that forged alliances with Qaddafi during his 42-year rule, many in Bani Walid are nostalgic.
State employees are often unpaid, schools and hospitals have been run down, and citizens have been caught up in the intermittent conflict.
Several residents said they would vote for the late Qaddafi’s most prominent son, Seif Al-Islam, who made a last stand in Bani Walid before disappearing into the desert. His whereabouts are not clear.
“Life was 100 times better under the old system. We had security, a salary, health care,” said Mohamed Hussein, a 40-year old who was searching with his cousin for iron in the ruins of hotel.
“We are trying to sell the iron for maybe 10 dinars $1.2 on the black market) because our salaries have not come through.”
The hotel has not been rebuilt as a drop in oil revenues due to armed group blockades has left little spare cash in what was once one of the richest countries in the Middle East.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait slam UN for human rights report on Yemen

Updated 33 min 6 sec ago

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait slam UN for human rights report on Yemen

  • Kuwait’s permanent delegate to the UN said that the report was “deeply flawed”
  • Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the UN also said the report has come away from “objectivity and characterized by haste”

DUBAI: Saudi Arabia and Kuwait on Wednesday slammed a report prepared by United Nations experts over alleged human rights violations in Yemen.

Kuwait’s permanent delegate to the UN, Ambassador Jamal Al-Ghunaim told the 39th session of the UN Human Rights Council that the report was “deeply flawed.”

“[The report] seems to hurl false accusations at the Saudi-led Coalition,” Al-Ghunaim said.

He said the UN experts singled out the coalition of Arab states fighting Yemen’s Iran-allied Houthi militia as accountable for the human rights violations in the war-torn country.

“The Arab Coalition never ceased to cooperate with the UN specialists in Yemen to ensure that civilian casualties are averted,” he said.

The Kuwaiti diplomat went on to give the Arab coalition credit for their “efforts to restore normalcy and hope to the lives of the Yemeni people.”

Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the UN, Abdulaziz Al-Waselthe, also said the report has come away from “objectivity and characterized by haste” in drawing conclusions and came full of errors in its approach and contents.

In a speech to the Human Rights Council, A-Waselthe said that the report ignored the information provided to the group of experts by the concerning agencies in the Arab Coalition.

The Kuwaiti envoy condemned the Houthis’ acts of aggression that violates international humanitarian laws.