UNDP: Pakistan has largest youth population in country’s history

Minister of Interior Ahsan Iqbal launched the Pakistan National Human Development Report. (Photo courtesy: Ahsan Iqbal/Twitter)
Updated 04 May 2018
0

UNDP: Pakistan has largest youth population in country’s history

  • NHDR notes that 64 percent of Pakistan’s total population is below the age of 30 while 29 percent is between 15 and 29 years old
  • Pakistan is the “second youngest in South Asian region after Afghanistan.”

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Pakistan launched its National Human Development Report (NHDR) that focuses on youth, primarily because Pakistan currently has the largest generation of young people recorded in its history.

The NHDR report said that 64 percent of the total population is below the age of 30, and 29 percent is between the ages of 15 and 29.

“It is currently one of the youngest countries in the world and the second youngest in the South Asian region after Afghanistan,” the report said.

The report title “Unleashing the potential of a Young Pakistan” was launched in Islamabad on Wednesday. It seeks to understand Pakistan’s human development challenges for the future.

“It focuses on how to improve human development outcomes — by empowering young people, addressing the root causes of the obstacles they face, and by proposing innovative ways to surmount these challenges,” UNDP said in a statement.
 
The report examined three key drivers of youth empowerment: quality education, gainful employment and meaningful engagement.

Written by Dr. Adil Najam, dean at Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University and Dr. Faisal Bari, associate professor of economics at the Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), the Pakistan NHDR accentuates the critical role played by quality education, steady employment and meaningful engagement.
 
The report uses the Human Development Index (HDI) to measure overall achievement, emphasizing three main aspects in a country’s policy-making: people, opportunities and choices.

Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Interior and Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms, who attended the launch of the report, said: “It is essential to include young people at all levels of decision-making, because voice and participation are a key part of the human development approach and important for long term policy-making.”
 
Neil Buhne, the UN resident coordinator, said: “Never have the opportunities for social, economic and political progress been so great. Nor have the challenges facing us ever been more pressing. Being aware of this opportunity, the United Nations in line with the Government of Pakistan’s Vision 2025, has prioritized working with youth as a key pillar of our work across the board.”
 
Dr. Adil Najam, co-lead author of the NHDR, said: “The future of Pakistan — one way or the other — will be determined by those who are between age 15 and 29 today. The single most useful thing that the rest of us can do is to create meaningful opportunities in education, employment and engagement that can empower our young to unleash their potential.”


Warren ancestry highlights how tribes decide membership

Updated 1 min 5 sec ago
0

Warren ancestry highlights how tribes decide membership

  • For centuries, a person’s percentage of Native American blood had nothing to do with determining who was a tribal member
FLAGSTAFF, Arizona: The clash between Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and President Donald Trump over her Native American heritage highlights the varying methods tribes use to decide who belongs.
The decision has wide-ranging consequences for Native American communities and their relationship with the federal government.
Some tribes rely on blood relationships to confer membership. Historically, they took a broader view that included non-biological connections and people’s value in society.
The 573 federally recognized tribes are sovereign governments that must be consulted on issues that affect them. Within tribes, enrollment also means being able to seek office, vote in tribal elections and secure property rights.
For centuries, a person’s percentage of Native American blood had nothing to do with determining who was a tribal member. And for some tribes, it still doesn’t.