Bolsonaro’s Israel embassy move: high-risk mix of religion, politics

A photo taken on October 28, 2018, shows the Israeli and Brazilian flags hanging outside the building housing the offices of the Brazilian Embassy, in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv. (AFP)
Updated 07 November 2018
0

Bolsonaro’s Israel embassy move: high-risk mix of religion, politics

  • Israel’s annexation of east Jerusalem following the 1967 Six-Day War with Egypt, Syria and Jordan, has never been internationally recognized
  • Brazilian evangelicals follow Christian Zionism, the belief that the return of the Jews to the Holy Land in 1948 with the establishment of the state of Israel was in accordance with a biblical prophecy announcing the return of the Messiah

RIO DE JANEIRO: In announcing his intention to move Brazil’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, President-elect Jair Bolsonaro may please his evangelical Christian support base, but would break with a half century of diplomacy.
In following the lead of his US counterpart Donald Trump, the incoming president of Latin America’s biggest country would not only isolate the country diplomatically but also run the risk of provoking commercial retaliation from Arab states, some of which are major importers of Brazilian meat.
“Brazil has been supporting a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine for more than 50 years and this decision could throw all those efforts into the bin,” said Guilherme Casaroes, a political science professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation think-tank.
Israel’s annexation of east Jerusalem following the 1967 Six-Day War with Egypt, Syria and Jordan, has never been internationally recognized.
The United Nations maintains an ambiguous position over any eventual final status for the sacred city — cherished by the three major Abrahamic religions — but a 1947 resolution says it should become a “corpus separatum,” run independently of either Israel or the Palestinians.
To that end, no embassies should be established there until a solution has been agreed upon by both sides.
That was the line followed by Brasilia until Bolsonaro won a second-round run-off election against leftist candidate Fernando Haddad on October 28. He will be inaugurated as Brazil’s president on January 1.
“For me, it’s just about respecting the decisions of a sovereign nation,” Bolsonaro said in a television interview on Monday.
However, he performed an almost Trumpian about-turn on Tuesday by insisting that “it hasn’t been decided yet.”

Were he to abandon that controversial plan, he would risk alienating the religious support that helped propel the far-right Bolsonaro to a commanding victory with 55 percent of the vote.
And for them, the status of Jerusalem is sacrosanct.
The most conservative evangelicals see Israel as “the center of all history,” a sort of ideal, to which “there is an attachment and a need to defend Israel as a chosen people,” said Ronilso Pacheco, a theological researcher at Rio de Janeiro’s PUC Catholic University.
“That’s an extremely literal reading of the Bible without taking into account context, history.”
Brazilian evangelicals follow Christian Zionism, the belief that the return of the Jews to the Holy Land in 1948 with the establishment of the state of Israel was in accordance with a biblical prophecy announcing the return of the Messiah.
Although born into a Catholic family, Bolsonaro married an evangelical Christian and went to Israel in 2016 to be baptized in the River Jordan by a pastor.
However, piety is not the only reason for Bolsonaro to move the embassy, much to the delight of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
“On top of the symbolic value for evangelicals, this measure shows a desire to break from a traditional foreign policy based on multilateral relationships,” said Monica Herz, professor at PUC’s international relations institute.
For her, following in Trump’s footsteps suggests Brazil is “aligning itself with the American government, something we didn’t even do during the military dictatorship.”

A former army parachutist, Bolsonaro has made no secret of his admiration for Brazil’s military dictatorship, which ruled from 1964-85.
His Israeli overtures have a secondary motivation as Bolsonaro is a fan of Israeli’s advanced military technology.
His son, Flavio and newly-elected Rio governor, Wilson Witzel, are due shortly to travel to Israel to negotiate the purchase of attack drones which could subsequently be used by security forces in the fight against drug-traffickers.
Casaroes, though, believes “Brazil could get closer to the US and Israel without transferring its embassy.”
Ricardo Ferraco, a member of the external relations commission in Brazil’s congress, said recently that he felt Bolsonaro had been too quick to make his promise, “without reflecting on the consequences.”
Meanwhile, the Arab Brazilian chamber of commerce has already expressed its concern given Brazil is the biggest producer in the world of hallal meat, much of which is exported to Arab countries.
The Palestinian envoy to Brazil, Ibrahim Alzeben, said on Monday that he hoped Bolsonaro had merely been electioneering and that the incoming government would “maintain Brazil’s traditional position.”


Pakistan PM Imran Khan lashes out at Trump “tirade“

Updated 58 min 4 sec ago
0

Pakistan PM Imran Khan lashes out at Trump “tirade“

  • Trump, during an interview with Fox News, defended cutting aid to Islamabad and suggested Pakistani authorities knew Osama bin Laden’s location prior to his killing
  • Khan said in a series of tweets that “record needs to be put straight on Mr.Trump’s tirade against Pakistan”

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan on Monday lashed out at US President Donald Trump following his remarks that Pakistan doesn’t “do a damn thing” for the United States despite billions of dollars in US aid for the South Asian nation.
The friction threatens to further worsen already fragile relations between Islamabad and Washington, on-off allies who have repeatedly clashed about the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan’s alleged support for Islamist militants.
Khan, who assumed power in August and is known for his fiery anti-American rhetoric, said in a series of tweets that “record needs to be put straight on Mr.Trump’s tirade against Pakistan” over the weekend.
Trump, during a Fox News TV interview aired on Sunday, defended cutting aid to Islamabad and also suggested Pakistani authorities knew Osama bin Laden’s location prior to his killing by US troops in a raid inside Pakistan in 2011.
Pakistan denies supporting Afghan Taliban insurgents waging war against US-backed troops in Afghanistan and Islamabad has also always rejected claims officials aided former Al-Qaeda leader bin Laden.
“Instead of making Pakistan a scapegoat for their failures, the US should do a serious assessment of why, despite 140000 NATO troops plus 250,000 Afghan troops & reportedly $1 trillion spent on war in Afghanistan, the Taliban today are stronger than before,” Khan tweeted.
Trump, in a pre-recorded interview, said bin Laden had been living in “a nice mansion” in Pakistan next to a military academy and “everybody in Pakistan knew he was there.”
“And we give Pakistan $1.3 billion a year. ...(bin Laden) lived in Pakistan, we’re supporting Pakistan, we’re giving them $1.3 billion a year — which we don’t give them anymore, by the way. I ended it because they don’t do anything for us, they don’t do a damn thing for us.”
Khan said Pakistan had borne the brunt of the United States’ war on terror, which focused on militants that straddle the Afghanistan-Pakistan tribal belt.
“No Pakistani was involved in 9/11 but Pak decided to participate in US War on Terror,” Khan said. “Pakistan suffered 75,000 casualties in this war & over $123 bn was lost to economy. US “aid” was a minuscule $20 bn.”
Khan also pointed out that Pakistan continued to provide its roads and air space for the re-supply for more than 10,000 US troops currently based in Afghanistan.
“Can Mr.Trump name another ally that gave such sacrifices?”