Obama wades into mosque debate

US President Barack Obama hosts an iftar dinner at the White House on Friday. (AP)

By BARBARA FERGUSON | ARAB NEWS

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama is under siege after speaking out in favor of building a mosque near Ground Zero, a stance that has elevated the contentious issue to the presidential level ahead of a difficult election season for Democrats.

Obama came out in favor of the proposal for the first time Friday night during a White House iftar dinner in the holy month of Ramadan.

"... Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances," Obama said.

"This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are."

In a highly charged election-year debate, Obama surely knew that his words would not only make headlines in the US, but also be heard by Muslims worldwide and find favor with them.

Thus his words were an effort to reach out to the global Muslim community. The guests at Friday's dinner included ambassadors and officials from numerous nations including Saudi Arabia.

Obama's position runs counter to the opinions of the majority of Americans, according to polls. A CNN/Opinion Research poll released this week found that nearly 70 percent of Americans opposed the mosque plan while just 29 percent approved. An AOL poll Saturday found that of those voting online, 88 percent said they were “completely” against it.

This may explain why a number of Democratic politicians — all up for re-election in November — have shied away from the controversy.

Some 9/11 victims' advocates and Republicans have strongly condemned Obama's support for the mosque, which would be part of a $100 million Islamic community center two blocks from where nearly 3,000 people perished when hijacked jetliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001.  They also say the plan is "insensitive" to victims' relatives.

But while the president called the World Trade Center site "hallowed grounds," he also said the proper way to honor it was to apply American values.

""Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect towards those who are different from us and that way of life, that quintessentially American creed, stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today."

Obama's remarks drew prompt responses from those who oppose it.

"President Obama is wrong," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told reporters. "It is insensitive and uncaring for the Muslim community to build a mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero. While the Muslim community has the right to build the mosque, they are abusing that right by needlessly offending so many people who have suffered so much."

Right-wing politicians such as former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have opposed the mosque. Palin said this month: "Doesn't it stab you in the heart, as it does ours throughout the heartland?"

Gingrich in July called the mosque proposal a "test of the timidity, passivity and historic ignorance of American elites."

But James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, praised the president for finally weighing in with his opinion. "The opposition to the Muslim Community Center ... in Manhattan is based on bigotry and is being fueled by opportunists on the right.

"Look at the line-up arrayed against the center — it's the same cast of characters who have been opposed to all things Arab and Muslim for years now," Zogby told Arab News.  "They've made an industry of their intolerance ... Their defaming and deliberate mischaracterization of the work of (the imam) Faisal Abul Raouf is disgraceful."

He said he hoped that the president's words would "toughen up" those who have been silent on the issue.

Hussein Ibish, senior fellow at the American Task Force on Palestine, said Obama's opinion was important for the nation. "It's extremely important that President Obama has joined ... so many other national leaders in defending the core American traditions of religious freedom and tolerance.

"Since there are millions of Muslim Americans, their rights as equal citizens have to be defended by all real American leaders.  It unfortunately became necessary for the president to make this point clearly and firmly to the entire country," said Ibish.

 "The foes of the Islamic center have been trying to drag Obama into this debate, and some have urged Obama to avoid wading into it. But now he has, and he isn't hedging a bit: He's saying that opposing the group's right to build the Islamic center is, in essence, un-American. I look forward to the response from the project's opponents,” noted Greg Sargent, in Saturday's Washington Post.

"Obama's strenuous defense of the 'Ground Zero mosque' is significant not just in bolstering the credibility of his message to the Muslim world, but it also engages him directly in the political fight against far right extremists here at home who wish to erode the American values at stake in the fight over the mosque," wrote Faiz Shakir, in Think Progress.

But Jennifer Rubin, calling his decision an abomination, wrote in Commentary: "... his sympathies for the Muslim World take precedence over those, such as they are, for his fellow citizens."

The imam of the proposed Cordoba House Islamic Center, Feisal Abdul Rauf, has promoted the center as a place to foster religious tolerance, Islamic heritage and healing.

Rauf has been vilified by some GOP opponents of the mosque, but he was one of the loudest Muslim voices condemning the Sept. 11 attacks and was a frequent adviser to President George W. Bush.

Comments

FRANCIS ELLISON

Report abuse
The best response to the ground zero mosque is to preach Biblical Christianity to New Yorkers and all citizens, even in front of the ground zero mosque on the sidewalk, which by the way is public property.

EMILY PATCH

Report abuse
Bravo Obama! I am proud of you.

ALAWI FRANCIS

Report abuse
Somebody wrote Obama's speech for him and he practiced in front of a mirror to appear very honourable and dignified in front of his audience. So he took many days to say a word. Without his teleprompter he is a mumbler. Turn off the TV when he comes on. He broke many of his promises. It is just politically correct to say what he says, but Muslims have been put in a trap now, because the Jewish mayorwas no fool to gave permission to build the mosque near Ground Zero which is absolutely bound to antagonise people enough to make relatives of victims of 911 and ordinary American much more to feel hate when the hear "Muslim, Islam" or see the mosque near Ground Zero. Israel never would just love to see the mosque there. The Muslim leaders who decided in this misadventure, have done a disservice to Muslims. Another site could have been chosen. America does not forbid Hindu temples, etc . Bill Gates is not the only richest man in the U.S who donates money to charities, but other rich Americans also donate, but in the Pakistani flood far, far less has gone to Pakistan, because many believe the Government is corrupt, money goes to terrorists and there is almost no reliable accounting. Immediately so much aid went to Haiti etc, but now something is hindering, which could have been far more, though a lot of food, medicines are in place for distribution. May the rains stop. Someone add their thoughts on this

KADU ARSHAD AHMED

Report abuse
My respect towords MR.Barack Obama has increased by studing this News.
He is the only person that listens the right message of his country people & gives equal importence to all the community people.
Thank u.

RT

Report abuse
Bull... the only reason the muslims want to build their mosque there is to portray a monument to their horrible deed. Why else would they want to build there when so many are against it? Is that understanding on their part? Hardly.
Post your comment

required

required (email will never be displayed)

Please enter the following characters in the box provided (case sensitive). This helps us prevent automated programs from creating accounts and sending spam.

All comments are subject to approval

Terms and conditions

Latest comments