China paper says regulation must ‘keep pace with times’

China paper says regulation must ‘keep pace with times’
Updated 10 January 2013
Follow

China paper says regulation must ‘keep pace with times’

China paper says regulation must ‘keep pace with times’

GUANGZHOU, China: A Chinese newspaper at the center of protests over censorship said Thursday that Communist Party regulation of the media must “keep pace with the times,” in its first edition since the row began.
“It’s fundamental that the party regulates the press, but its method of regulation needs to be advanced to keep pace with the times,” the Southern Weekly said in an editorial, without referring directly to the controversy.
The row at the popular liberal paper, which had an article urging greater rights protection replaced by one praising the ruling party, has seen demonstrators mass outside its headquarters in the southern city of Guangzhou.
But the newspaper came out on Thursday as scheduled, after reports that staff and authorities had agreed that officials would no longer directly interfere in content before publication.
There was speculation that as part of the deal, Southern Weekly would not give its account of the controversy.
In the event the editorial on press freedom was printed in small text, as a commentary about another article on media management which was reprinted from the People’s Daily, the party’s mouthpiece.
The Southern Weekly said that because of the rising popularity of the Internet, China needed an “updated method of managing public opinion.” It called for “reasonable and constructive media” to be protected.
It used phrases commonly employed by the communist leadership and did not directly criticize the government’s handling of the controversy, apparently as a cautious move.
“Chinese media can never be independent of the government... but the propaganda department should not censor in advance,” said Min Jiang, a professor of journalism at Beijing Foreign Studies University.
The deal “seemed to mark progress” in setting limits for government censorship, he added.
At their peak Monday the demonstrations, the first against press censorship in two decades, drew hundreds of people and the campaign was backed by the blogosphere and celebrities on Weibo, China’s equivalent of Twitter.
Reports said Hu Chunhua, the top communist official in Guangdong province where the newspaper is based and a rising star in the party, had stepped in to mediate in the row.
Only a few protesters gathered outside the newspaper’s main office Thursday. Reporters saw two put into a vehicle and driven away in an indication that authorities’ tolerance for the demonstrations was waning.
Thursday’s edition led with a two-page investigation into a fire at an orphanage in the central province of Henan, and devoted pages three and four to a review of the most influential legal cases of 2012.
It was available in Beijing and Shanghai in the morning and kiosks in Guangzhou started selling it in the afternoon. “I don’t think there will be any results from this,” said a student buying a copy, referring to the protests.
Southern Weekly’s investigative reports have made it one of the country’s biggest-selling papers with a keen following among urban intellectuals, but also left it subject to periodic purges.
All Chinese media organizations receive instructions from government propaganda departments, which suppress news seen by the party as “negative.”
But the censorship of Southern Weekly was seen as unusually direct, although the original article soon emerged on Chinese social media.
Former journalists at the newspaper, as well as intellectuals and students published open letters calling for the resignation of Tuo Zhen, the propaganda official said to have been responsible.
The censorship controversy appeared to spread to Beijing, with the publisher of the Beijing News — known for its investigative reporting — threatening to resign, according to accounts posted online by newspaper staff.
The publisher Dai Zigeng resisted pressure from censors to reprint an editorial from the state-run Global Times newspaper which was critical of the Southern Weekly.