Brotherhood’s plan exposed

THE strategic plan to empower the Muslim Brotherhood in the region has been exposed.
As part of the plan, the Muslim Brotherhood tried to align its interests with those of the Americans and their Western counterparts in order to safeguard the security of Israel.
Perhaps this is the reason behind Israeli intelligence statements describing the “Ikhwan’s” rule as a golden era.
Such statements indicate that security cooperation with the Brotherhood is even more advanced than it was during the Mubarak era.
The Ikhwan worked to expose the failure of the security agreement in Sinai. Evidence suggests that the Brotherhood received some $8bn to implement this project and planned to use these funds to target the Egyptian Army in Sinai with the cooperation of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and extremist terrorist groups. This plan aimed to expose the weakness of the army in order to justify the Ikhwan’s interference with the gigantic project devised for the development of the region.
The Ikhwan’s empowerment plan includes a five-year peace plan with Israel, a memorandum of understanding with the United States and strategic cooperation with Turkey and Qatar. The Ikhwan reached a strategic understanding with Iran about a set of key issues. In fact, the Ikhwan sought to finalize a tripartite strategic center comprised of Egypt, Turkey and Iran.
They didn’t mind weakening the army, as they already saw the army as a force that would not work in their favor.
In fact, their strength was derived from emasculating the army.
This is why Mursi passed on army secrets to a foreign body, a move that triggered the nationalist response of the army, who were by no means ignorant to his undercover efforts to weaken their forces. Unsurprisingly, foreign bodies supported the Ikhwan’s time in power. Yet they failed since they sought to implement their agenda too fast, hurting Egyptian national security in the process.
The counter-revolution to rectify the situation should not come as a surprise at all, then. The green light given to the army was part of the strategy to deconstruct and reconstruct.
When the Ikhwan proved to be ineffective in filling their shoes because of the cohesion of the army and popular support for its forces, foreign bodies thought of paving the ground for a confrontation between the army and Ikhwan in a last-ditch effort to divide and rule from afar.
Meanwhile, the Ikhwan’s international bureau had met with officials in Istanbul. A key decision that resulted from the meeting was to drag the army into a confrontation with the hope that this may fragment army forces. Another decision was to encourage terrorist activities in Sinai to put pressure on the army.
This was thought of with the aim of cornering the army into either accepting the Ikhwan and their policies or risking anarchy and war. Harassing the Coptic Christian constituency was part of their plan as well. What is clear is that the plan to fragment the region is as alive as ever. Indeed, this underlying plan has been around since the time of the Crusaders to the present time.
The West and Britain have supported religious movements since 1850. This support was crowned in 1928 when the British declared their support for the Muslim Brotherhood.
We are all well aware of colonial projects for the Middle East, from Bernard Lewis’ works to Condoleezza Rice’s comments several years ago. We are also aware of the study being carried out by 120 experts and supervised by the Pentagon to fragment countries including Russia, Iran, India, China and, of course, the countries of the Middle East. This, thankfully, has been the driving force behind the street protests in Egypt.
Images of Nasser, El-Sisi, and Putin within the protests bore a message of rejection to hegemony.
Through its attempt to use Russian and Chinese plans, the army seeks to send America a clear message, which is that despite their strategic relationship, America has no right to tell Egyptians what to do to maintain the stability of their country. Ironically, even conflicting states such as Iran and Turkey supported the Ikhwan and criticized recent military measures in Egypt. It is for this reason that Erdogan seems to be toning down his support for Syrian rebels at a time when Iran is strongly supporting Assad.
In short, the symbiotic relationship between the army and its people has brought down the Brotherhood. Propaganda has been exposed and slogans have been discredited.
Billions were paid to nongovernmental organizations to work as advanced intelligence posts. Around 38 visual and audio stations were given support in order to poison the political scene. Additionally, social media has played a role in brainwashing the masses into destroying the state and its institutions to ignite internal sedition and sectarian strife.
All of these projects, however, have ultimately failed, as Arab youth have proved a degree of awareness of the strategic schemes that target Arab countries.

• [email protected]