Transitional justice could help stabilize former Daesh territory
Following the territorial defeat of Daesh in northeastern Syria, Kurdish-led local authorities are now grappling with bringing the group’s members to justice. The scale of the crimes and the sheer number of victims — combined with massive shortages in resources and personnel — make the task extremely difficult to address through the traditional legal system. An alternative approach would be transitional justice mechanisms, which are often used after political conflicts to redress human rights abuses. So far, however, relevant authorities do not seem inclined to implement such solutions.
What is at stake is the long-term stability of northeastern Syria. There are hundreds of thousands of families with ties to Daesh and, in the absence of a credible justice process, an enormous risk of extrajudicial revenge killings targeting not only former militants but also their entire extended families. The current judicial approach simply cannot cope with the volume of cases and the atrocities involved.
The current efforts by the Kurdish-led self-administration entity to bring justice to victims are largely focused on detaining Daesh members and, where possible, charging them with terrorism offences. Authorities have set up local counterterrorism courts to prosecute thousands of locally recruited Daesh members who are in custody.
But not all detained Daesh followers end up in jail. Members of the group who are from the region but did not hold senior roles and are not accused of major crimes are being released under limited reconciliation deals. Fighters qualifying under those criteria are being discharged after discussions with prominent tribal leaders in their communities, who are responsible for preventing them from rejoining Daesh.
On top of concerns regarding due process, particularly that suspects are not allowed representation by defense lawyers, local courts are seriously understaffed and limited in number. At the current rate of prosecutions, it would probably take more than a decade to process the cases of all of the Daesh suspects in detention. Many victims are also upset at seeing Daesh members walk free without even admitting their guilt publicly, especially in cases where the court proceedings have lacked transparency.
Another concern is that the local administration is holding tens of thousands of civilians with ties to Daesh or its members in camps scattered across the northeast. Most of them are women and children who are not officially under arrest, but in reality, they are being detained in the camps without any clear strategy to deal with them.
At the current rate of prosecutions, it would probably take more than a decade to process all of the Daesh suspects in detention
More broadly, the current counterterrorism approach has largely failed to address the full range of crimes committed by Daesh. In addition, there are no formal mechanisms to determine the fate of people detained or forcibly disappeared by Daesh. Human rights groups have documented more than 8,000 people detained by Daesh whose fates remain unknown, but the actual number of victims is assuredly much higher.
Nonetheless, there are still no official mechanisms or entities to obtain and process information from families of victims and Daesh members or to properly excavate mass graves to determine the status of the missing. Local courts are mainly focusing on establishing whether Daesh members were fighters to establish their guilt or innocence, but there is not a clear process to highlight the personal responsibility of individuals for war crimes or crimes against humanity. The counterterrorism courts also do not allow victims to file charges for crimes such as rape, theft and kidnapping, or to provide evidence against Daesh members.
To overcome the limitations of the counterterrorism framework, transitional justice provides mechanisms to establish accountability for Daesh crimes and give victims a sense of justice. The formation of community-led fact-finding commissions could help to document and gather evidence about the full range of Daesh crimes, including individual responsibility. The commissions could also complement counterterrorism trials by sharing findings with relevant local authorities and encouraging victims to participate in proceedings.
The commissions should also consult with residents of the region on alternative paths to justice, such as monetary compensation and public apologies, to realize a sense of closure. Clearly, some compensatory measures should be limited to former Daesh members who did not commit violent crimes or were released for lack of evidence.
Those who committed serious crimes should be tried, while ensuring the participation of victims in court proceedings, with transparency about the verdicts. All this is currently lacking. The commissions could also cooperate with existing local reconciliation committees comprising local tribal leaders and other community figures to lead reconciliation and mediation efforts between former Daesh members, their victims and the families involved.
Northeastern Syria is a clear example of the limitations of counterterrorism laws to provide victims with a sense of justice. A transitional justice model could provide alternative avenues to resolve grievances and help communities heal and reconcile with hundreds of thousands of families previously linked to Daesh.
There is little local expertise in such a model and few precedents applying transitional justice to the crimes of violent extremist groups. While a lot of time has been lost, it is not too late for the international community, the local self-administration entity and Syrian civil society groups to develop more coherent transitional justice mechanisms to ensure victim participation and bring Daesh members fully to account for their crimes. In the absence of such an effort, the long-term stability in that region will remain in doubt regardless of Daesh’s territorial defeat.
• Haid Haid is a research fellow at the International Center for the Study of Radicalization at King’s College London. He is also a consulting research fellow of Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa program. Copyright: Syndication Bureau