Many Sri Lankans want a strongman leader, and that favors Gotabaya Rajapaksa

Many are rooting for Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who despite fighting allegations of war crimes, was named on Sunday as the presidential candidate of the opposition. (File/Reuters)
Updated 12 August 2019

Many Sri Lankans want a strongman leader, and that favors Gotabaya Rajapaksa

  • The Rajapaksa brothers, Gotabaya and Mahinda, were credited with bringing peace to Sri Lanka in 2009
  • Gotabaya is facing lawsuits in the US for instigating and authorizing the extrajudicial killing of a journalist

COLOMBO: Sri Lankans, angered by the government’s inability to prevent the Easter Sunday terror attacks that killed more than 250 people, want a strongman back in power who can guarantee their safety and bring back economic growth.
Many are rooting for Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who despite fighting allegations of war crimes, was named on Sunday as the presidential candidate of the opposition nationalist Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) party.
Gotabaya said on Twitter he is “humbled” to accept the nomination to represent the common aspirations of the people and the SLPP-led alliance.
The Rajapaksa brothers, Gotabaya and Mahinda, were credited with bringing peace to Sri Lanka in 2009 by defeating the Tamil Tigers in a brutal end to the 26-year-long civil war between the Sinhalese Buddhist majority and minority Tamil groups. Gotabaya was the defense secretary at the time and Mahinda the nation’s president.
“The people have requested a leader who can ensure their security,” Basil Rajapaksa, founder of the SLPP and youngest brother of Gotabaya and Mahinda told reporters on Thursday.
Gotabaya is facing lawsuits in the United States for instigating and authorizing the extrajudicial killing of a journalist and of war crimes against the Tamils during his time as defense secretary.
He has denied the allegations and said the lawsuits, brought by torture survivors and the daughter of the slain journalist, were timed to thwart his presidential run. A final date for the presidential elections has not been decided but must be held before Dec 9.

Ignored warnings

Sri Lanka’s constitution is modelled on the French system of government where the president has executive powers while the prime minister heads the parliament.
The current government is headed by President Maithripala Sirisena, the leader of center-left Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) while Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is from the center-right United National Party (UNP), which has a majority in the parliament.
Sirisena and Wickremesinghe, who have been at loggerheads since last October, have blamed one another for ignoring warnings from India and failing to stop the attacks on churches and luxury hotels on April 21 — Easter Sunday.
Calls for a nationalist leader like Gotabaya, who has strong support from within Sri Lanka’s majority Sinhalese Buddhist community, echo similar choices made by voters in other Asian nations including India and Bangladesh.
In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was elected for a second term in May in a landslide victory, rallied his Hindu nationalist base and turned the campaign into a fight for national security and an aggressive stance against Pakistan.
Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who won a third straight term in an election last December, has been criticized for suppressing dissent and jailing critics.

Echoes of Duterte
Reuters spoke to about 60 people, many of whom were victims of the terror attacks or affected by communal violence over the past year, and while some plan to abstain from voting, many of those who will vote say they want a more authoritarian figure.
Many Sri Lankan Catholics will not vote for Sirisena if he stands, said a senior Sri Lankan priest, noting two of three churches attacked at Easter were Catholic.
He is looking at Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs as an example of the kind of behavior that is required despite evidence that it has involved extrajudicial killings by police.
“A third-world country like us needs a tough leader like Duterte — he is doing whatever is needed to rid his country of evils,” said the priest, who did not want to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject.
“Gotabaya is accused of crimes but he is tough and that is what we need right now to bring back some order,” he said.
Father Jude Chrysantha Fernando, director for social communication at the Archdiocese of Colombo, said the church did not take political sides and would not ask people to vote for one candidate over another. He noted that even Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith of Sri Lanka had publicly made clear that the church is not taking political sides.
“What the cardinal said was that the political leaders and some security officials had prior information about attacks, but they have not taken any action,” he said. “That’s why the cardinal expressed his displeasure. But he did not take any political side. What he is asking is justice for the victims.”

Minorities divided
A country of 21 million, Sri Lanka has been a tinder box of sectarian and ethnic tensions, first between the majority Sinhalese Buddhist population and Tamil groups, and in recent years between the Sinhalese Buddhists and the Muslim minority.
While most Tamils are unlikely to vote for Gotabaya, the Muslim community may be divided.
S.H.M. Thameem, a government employee who is a Muslim, said he will vote for Gotabaya because the current government has failed to deliver.
“When there were anti-Muslim riots when he was the defense secretary, they were controlled within a day or two but Sirisena and Wickremesinghe have failed to control it. That adversely impacted the Muslim businesses and overall economy,” said Thameem, who lives in the north-central district of Anuradhapura.
J.M. Faleel, a Muslim autorickshaw driver in Colombo feels differently.
“We need a dictator, but I will not vote for Gotabaya as he is partially responsible for most of the suffering we see today,” said Faleel, referring to anti-Muslim riots and alleged abuses against the Tamils.
Keheliya Rambukwella, a spokesman for SLPP, said Gotabaya was out of the country when the worst violence against Muslims took place.
“But still he was able to prevent it within a day. This government could not control the spreading of anti-Muslim riots for a week last,” he told Reuters.
The lawsuit allegations in the United States may not hurt Gotabaya’s chances of winning because he has the overwhelming support of the Sinhalese Buddhist majority, said Kusal Perera, a political columnist in Sri Lanka.
“This election will be decided by the large majority of Sinhalese Buddhists who believe they need a hard-line president to put things right. The Tamils and Muslims will be left out in deciding the president,” said Perera.

FASTFACTS


Blasphemy accusation in Pakistan sparks ransacking of Hindu temple, school

Updated 9 min 41 sec ago

Blasphemy accusation in Pakistan sparks ransacking of Hindu temple, school

  • The violence erupted in the southern province of Sindh after a student accused the Hindu principal of blasphemy

KARACHI/ISLAMABAD: A crowd in Pakistan ransacked a school and Hindu temple after a Hindu principal was accused of blasphemy, police said on Monday, the latest case to raise concern about the fate of religious minorities in the predominantly Muslim country.
The violence erupted in the southern province of Sindh after a student accused the Hindu principal of blasphemy in comments about the Muslim Prophet Muhammad. The enraged crowd ransacked the school and damaged a nearby temple, a district police chief said.
The principal had been taken into protective custody and police were investigating both the alleged blasphemy and the rioters, he added.
“It seems the principal had not done anything intentionally,” the district police chief, Furrukh Ali, told Reuters.
Insulting Islam’s Prophet Muhammad carries a mandatory death penalty in Pakistan, which is about 95 percent Muslim and has among the harshest blasphemy laws in the world.
No executions for blasphemy have been carried out in Pakistan but enraged mobs sometimes kill people accused of it.
Rights groups say the blasphemy law is often exploited by religious hard-liners as well as ordinary Pakistanis to settle scores.
The independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan condemned the weekend violence, footage of which was recorded in a video and circulated on social media. It called on authorities should take prompt action.
“The video ... is chilling: mob violence against a member of a religious minority is barbaric, unacceptable,” the commission said in a post on Twitter.
Hindus make up about 1.6 percent of Pakistan’s population of 208 million, the majority of whom are Sunni Muslims.
In January, the Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of a Christian women who spent years on death row after being convicted of blasphemy in a case that had drawn alarm from religious and human rights advocates.
In March, Pakistan’s government sacked a provincial minister for making offensive comments about Hindus as tension between Pakistan and Hindu-majority neighbor India ran high after a militant attack in the Indian-controlled portion of the contested Kashmir region.