Compromise essential if US-German ties are to flourish

Compromise essential if US-German ties are to flourish

Compromise essential if US-German ties are to flourish
Short Url

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s farewell visit to the White House this month offers an ideal opportunity to reflect on the state of US-German relations. But it is not a sentimental opportunity. The long, complicated history of the bilateral relationship may be about to enter a new phase.

From the aftermath of the Second World War until Germany’s reunification in 1990, the US shepherded the country’s reconstruction and economic resurgence. This epoch could be summed up under the heading “Guardian and Ward,” which was far more fortuitous than the preceding chapter, “Enmity and War.” In that chapter, Germany’s ruthless pursuit of global power in two savage world wars eventually ended in its complete and utter defeat. The Allies’ victory in 1945 left Germany divided into four occupation zones. Large swaths of its eastern territory were lost, resulting in 12 million refugees and expellees. And, everywhere, there was the moral abyss of the Nazis’ monstrous legacy.

Since postwar reconstruction relied on US protection and aid, it occurred exclusively in Western Europe, and thus also only in West Germany. Joseph Stalin viewed the Soviet Union as the socialist Greater Russian counterpoint to the US-led capitalist West. From the late 1940s onward, this ideological and geostrategic posturing sustained the Cold War, which played out largely in Germany, particularly in Berlin, the central point of the new great power divide.

Germany’s twice-defeated bid for European hegemony and global domination gave way to a close alliance between the US and the Federal Republic of Germany. A degree of political distrust on the part of the US persisted, but German “transatlanticists” refused to see it. From their perspective, the alliance (which included a military component with the establishment of NATO) had supplanted all previous antipathy and that was that.

They were wrong. Throughout the Cold War, the US pursued a multi-pronged strategy, both deterring the Soviet Union and maintaining control over Germany, in recognition of its vital position at the heart of Europe. The transatlantic relationship was never as simple as its champions wanted it to be, and it still isn’t today.

In normative terms, the Federal Republic was successfully integrated into the West more or less immediately, under its first postwar chancellor, Konrad Adenauer. But in terms of raw interests and political economy, significant differences remained. Since the mid-1950s, for example, the transatlantic perspective competed with a more distinctively European one. And with German Chancellor Willy Brandt’s “Ostpolitik” (Eastern Policy) in the 1970s — which coincided with the nascent detente between the US and the Soviet Union — the protector and the ward’s diverging interests became even more obvious.

Nonetheless, when the Soviet Union collapsed, the US was the only transatlantic power to issue immediate and wholehearted support for German reunification. For Germany’s European neighbors, its potential return as a geopolitical force brought back old fears of the “German question.”

The transatlantic relationship was never as simple as its champions wanted it to be, and it still isn’t today.

Joschka Fischer

When Germany became a fully sovereign state through reunification, the old protector-ward relationship necessarily changed. And yet Germany has not shaken the postwar mindset. Consider other similarly sized European powers. The UK and France are nuclear powers with permanent seats on the UN Security Council, where they do not hesitate to lay claim to a global leadership role. By contrast, Germany — the world’s fourth-largest national economy — makes no such claims.

Germany, therefore, will remain dependent on the US security guarantee for a long time to come. Not only is it haunted by its own history; it also must manage enormously complex security conditions. Lying at the heart of Europe, Germany must account for the interests of smaller Central and Eastern European countries — both within and outside of the EU — while also getting along with an increasingly expansionist, nuclear-armed Russia. And it must do all of that at a time when its economic foundations are fracturing.

Moreover, Germany must account for the strategic interests of its protector, even though they are not always congruent with its own. The US is engaged in an escalating confrontation with China, the 21st century’s new global power; but Beijing is one of Germany’s most important trade partners. Even more important is the EU, whose future Germany has a key role in shaping. German diplomacy is an immensely complicated enterprise, to say the least.

After Donald Trump’s presidency, which did more serious damage to US-German relations than anything else since the Second World War, the question for President Joe Biden is whether the US can regain its ally’s trust. What happens if the Trump era resumes — either with Trump himself or one of his many ambitious acolytes?

For Germans, this question will dwarf all other considerations in the coming years. The protector-ward relationship is no longer functional, but Germany also cannot establish a fully independent role for itself within a European framework. To make matters worse, differences in interests — starting with China and Russia — will bring more controversies and friction between the US and Germany. The next phase of the bilateral relationship, one hopes, will be defined by the high art of compromise.

  • Joschka Fischer, Germany’s foreign minister and vice chancellor from 1998 to 2005, was a leader of the German Green Party for almost 20 years. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view