BRUSSELS, 2 April 2003 — With troops locked in a bloody and unpredictable struggle in Iraq, leaders from “new Europe” are distancing themselves from the war that the US claims they back. Meanwhile, some countries that never backed war have vented their anger at being listed among America’s 45-nation “coalition of the willing”.
Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, began his political retreat before a shot was fired. Berlusconi was a signatory of the Anglo-Spanish letter that backed the US before the conflict began. That did not translate into concrete military support, however. Last week, Berlusconi was at pains to insist that the deployment in northern Iraq of 1,000 US paratroopers who had been stationed in Italy did not break a pledge that Italian bases would not be used for direct attacks on Saddam Hussein.
Denmark, which has backed the action, had to scale back its small military deployment because of parliamentary opposition. The Netherlands, which did not sign the Anglo-Spanish letter but was sympathetic, has ruled out military involvement, fearful of destabilizing negotiations to form a coalition government. Countries which took a tough, pro-American line are encountering political difficulties. Jose Maria Aznar, the prime minister of Spain, which has dispatched 9,000 troops to Iraq for humanitarian work, is under intense pressure from domestic opposition.
The publication of pictures of elite Polish troops posing for photos with US soldiers in Iraq provoked a backlash in Poland. Although Warsaw remains a firm supporter of the US, surveys suggest only 20 percent of Poles think their troops should be involved in fighting.
The weight of public opposition has forced countries to face in opposite directions. Ireland has made Shannon airport available to the US, but failed to endorse the war.
Across the ex-Communist nations of Europe, identified by Donald Rumsfeld, the US defense secretary, as part of the “coalition”, sentiment has proved ambivalent. One explanation is that the Anglo-Spanish letter endorsed by three of the applicant nations, and a subsequent declaration by a further 10 Eastern European states, did not commit them to supporting hostilities. Some leaders went along with the formulation on the basis that taking a tough line might force President Saddam to back down.
