Starmer condemns Musk’s 'dangerous and inflammatory' far-right rally comments

Update Starmer condemns Musk’s 'dangerous and inflammatory' far-right rally comments
Elon Musk joined far-right leader Tommy Robinson on video link to address the crowds in London. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 15 September 2025
Follow

Starmer condemns Musk’s 'dangerous and inflammatory' far-right rally comments

Starmer condemns Musk’s 'dangerous and inflammatory' far-right rally comments
  • Tesla boss told protesters in London: 'Violence is coming to you' and 'you either fight back or you die'
  • Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, urges party leaders to join him in condemning Musk’s attempt 'to sow discord and incite violence on our streets'

LONDON: Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday condemned “dangerous” comments by Elon Musk after the X and Tesla owner told an anti-immigration rally that violence is coming to Britain and they must fight or die. But the UK government resisted opposition calls to sanction Musk for the remarks.
Starmer denounced violence on the fringes of Saturday’s 100,000 or more-strong “Unite the Kingdom” demonstration in London organized by far-right campaigner Tommy Robinson.
Police said 26 officers were injured, four seriously, as protesters tried to breach lines separating them from a smaller anti-racist counter-demonstration. There were 25 people arrested at the event and the Metropolitan Police said more arrests would follow.
Addressing the demonstration by video link, Musk called for the dissolution of Parliament and an early election to remove Starmer’s center-left government. He told protesters “violence is coming to you” and “you either fight back or you die.”
Starmer’s spokesman, Dave Pares, said he didn’t think “the British public will have any truck with that kind of language.
“The UK is a fair, tolerant and decent country, so the last thing that British people want is dangerous and inflammatory language which threatens violence and intimidation on our streets,” he said.

Calls to sanction Musk

Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, the third-largest party in Britain’s Parliament, urged Starmer and Conservative opposition leader Kemi Badenoch to join him in condemning Musk’s attempt “to sow discord and incite violence on our streets” and interfere with British democracy.

They should “consider what sanctions Elon Musk should face as a consequence,” Davey said.
Starmer’s spokesman said the government had no plans to speak to Musk about his comments.
The prime minister wrote on X that peaceful protest “is core to our country’s values. But we will not stand for assaults on police officers doing their job or for people feeling intimidated on our streets because of their background or the color of their skin.”
This is not the first time Musk, an erstwhile ally of President Donald Trump, has supported hard-right and far-right figures in Europe, including Robinson, a convicted fraudster and founder of the anti-Islam English Defense League whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, and the Alternative for Germany party, or AfD.
Musk also is a critic of attempts by the UK and other European governments to clamp down on harmful online content, something he argues restricts free speech.
Saturday’s demonstration follows growing political concern about unauthorized immigration, especially the arrival of migrants across the English Channel in small boats. More than 30,000 people have made the dangerous crossing from France so far this year despite efforts by authorities from Britain, France and other countries to crack down on the people-smuggling gangs behind the trips.
The use of hotels to accommodate asylum-seekers has become a major political issued in Britain, sparking dozens of small but heated protests over the summer, some of which turned violent.

Flying the flag

Many of the demonstrators waved the UK’s Union Jack or red and white St. George flag of England. In recent weeks, the flags have proliferated on lampposts, motorway bridges and road intersections around the country as part of a seemingly grassroots campaign. Red crosses have also been painted on buildings in what some see as an intimidating gesture aimed at ethnic minorities.
The St. George flag, in particular, is a complex symbol. It can express patriotism and pride when supporting England’s sports teams, but has at times been appropriated by anti-immigration protesters and the hard right. The flag featured heavily at anti-asylum protests this summer, which were attended and in some cases organized by far-right activists.
“Flags can unite and divide as they are flown by people with different motives and meanings,” said Sunder Katwala of British Future, a think tank that looks at issues including integration and national identity.
James Freeman, a senior lecturer in political history at the University of Bristol, said the use of flags “to intimidate or demark certain areas as being out of bounds” was a historical phenomenon, though the link between the St. George flag and the hard right is “relatively recent.”
Starmer, who has expressed support for flying flags as symbols of national pride, wrote on X that “Britain is a nation proudly built on tolerance, diversity and respect. Our flag represents our diverse country and we will never surrender it to those that use it as a symbol of violence, fear and division.”


FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say
Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

WASHINGTON: The FBI has continued its personnel purge, forcing out additional agents and supervisors tied to the federal investigation into President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The latest firings came despite efforts by Washington’s top federal prosecutor to try to stop at least some of the terminations, people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.
The employees were told this week that they were being fired but those plans were paused after D.C. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro raised concerns, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss personnel matters.
The agents were then fired again Tuesday, though it’s not clear what prompted the about-face. The total number of fired agents was not immediately clear.
The terminations are part of a broader personnel upheaval under the leadership of FBI Director Kash Patel, who has pushed out numerous senior officials and agents involved in investigations or actions that have angered the Trump administration. Three ousted high-ranking FBI officials sued Patel in September, accusing him of caving to political pressure to carry out a “campaign of retribution.”
Spokespeople for Patel and Pirro didn’t immediately respond to messages seeking comment on Tuesday.
The FBI Agents Association, which has criticized Patel for the firings, said the director has “disregarded the law and launched a campaign of erratic and arbitrary retribution.”
“The actions yesterday — in which FBI Special Agents were terminated and then reinstated shortly after, and then only to be fired again today — highlight the chaos that occurs when long-standing policies and processes are ignored,” the association said. “An Agent simply being assigned to an investigation and conducting it appropriately within the law should never be grounds for termination.”
The 2020 election investigation that ultimately led to special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump has come under intense scrutiny from GOP lawmakers, who have accused the Biden administration Justice Department of being weaponized against conservatives. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has in recent weeks released documents from the investigation provided by the FBI, including ones showing that investigators analyzed phone records from more than a half dozen Republican lawmakers as part of their inquiry.
The Justice Department has fired prosecutors and other department employees who worked on Smith’s team, and the FBI has similarly forced out agents and senior officials for a variety of reasons as part of an ongoing purge that has added to the tumult and sense of unease inside the bureau.
The FBI in August ousted the head of the bureau’s Washington field office as well as the former acting director who resisted Trump administration demands to turn over the names of agents who participated in Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigations. And in September, it fired agents who were photographed kneeling during a racial justice protest in Washington that followed the 2020 death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.