Officials and attorneys for both sides said they will return
for more closed-door talks with US Magistrate Judge Arthur Boylan on June 7,
four days after a key appeals court hearing in St. Louis on the legality of the
lockout.
NFL lead negotiator Jeff Pash and Hall of Famer Carl Eller
both said the talks went well, but there was no indication of any significant
progress toward a new collective bargaining agreement. Pash said he thought
Boylan had done a good job of “pushing the parties,” but he said he doesn’t
believe the dispute over the future of the $9 billion business will be settled
in court.
“The only way
we’re going to solve this is by sitting down together,” Pash said, echoing the
NFL’s preference for traditional negotiations in a collective bargaining
setting and adding: “We owe it to our game. We owe it to our fans. We owe it to
each other, to the players and to the clubs, to sit down and negotiate.”
Said Pash: “I think we got some work done today, and we’re
going to keep at it.”
They’ve been at it for a long time.
The two sides met for 16 days before talks fell apart March
11 and the lockout began. Boylan, who presided over four days of mediation last
month and two more days this week, also had lunch with DeMaurice Smith,
executive director of the NFL Players Association, and NFL Commissioner Roger
Goodell.
Pash was coy when asked about the significance of that
separate meeting.
“We weren’t invited. Us staff guys, you know, we didn’t rate
for the big power lunch, so we’re eager to hear about it ourselves,” Pash said.
The two sides are not scheduled to meet again until June,
just a month before training camps typically begin and just eight weeks before
the first preseason game on Aug. 8.
“I feel we really got some movement between last night and
today,” Eller said, declining like the rest of the participants to discuss
details.
Linebacker Mike Vrabel, one of the plaintiffs on the
antitrust lawsuit against the league, questioned the NFL’s commitment to
striking a deal outside the courthouse after mediation concluded.
“I don’t know if there’s any sense of urgency on their
part,” Vrabel said. “I certainly understand that the closer you get to training
camp, and the dates as players we’re used to reporting for training camp and
playing preseason games and playing regular-season games, this thing becomes a
lot more real for everybody involved. The players aren’t out there doing the
work they’d normally be doing. They’re doing it on their own and they’re taking
a lot of risk. I think that people appreciate the fact that guys are still
preparing for a season.”
Vrabel added: “I think the most important thing is that we
continue to meet.”
Owners have a regularly scheduled meeting next week, but
Pash said they won’t be putting together a “plan of attack.”
“We’re not at war with anybody. These players are an
integral part of our business, and we want to work with them,” he said.
There are some huge court matters looming, including the
June 3 hearing before the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals on the legality of
the lockout, with a ruling likely a few weeks after. The same three-judge panel
handling the hearing has already ruled twice in favor of the league, keeping
the lockout in place.
US District Judge David Doty is also deciding whether to
award players more than $707 million in damages and to bar the NFL from using
$4 billion in broadcast revenue. Doty has already said the league failed to
secure the most income for the players when it re-negotiated those broadcast
contracts.
Also, the federal antitrust lawsuit filed against the NFL by
the players is still pending.
Robert Boland, a professor of sports management at New York
University who is following the case, said the timing doesn’t help the players.
“The players have had great solidarity to this point, but
that will get tighter as players go longer and longer without their workout and
signing bonuses and get closer to the season,” Boland said. “The longer we go
without any kind of sense of when they will get paid again, the more their
internal resolve is tested and the harder it becomes to hold them together.”
He added: “Essentially, the NFL does want and need to play,
but there’s really no incentive from a financial and technical perspective to
rush that. They can allow the players to come back to them.”
Separately, the US Chamber of Commerce business lobbying
group filed a brief Tuesday supporting the league.
The chamber, like the NFL, noted that the dispute is
currently before the National Labor Relations Board in the form of an unfair
labor negotiations charge against the players. Until then, the chamber said,
the court fight should be on hold and the NFL should be able to lock out its
players if needed.
“For the collective bargaining process to work as Congress
intended, the parties to the dispute must largely be left by the courts to
their own devices,” the chamber said. “The prospect of self-help forces the
parties to make difficult choices” with the option of judges coming to their
aid.”
The NHL, which could face its own labor problem next year,
earlier filed a similar brief supporting the NFL.
