Editorial: A pack of lies by Amnesty and HRW

Updated 05 August 2016

Editorial: A pack of lies by Amnesty and HRW

Non-government organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have a valuable role. But that value depends entirely on the truthfulness of their reports. It depends on the reliability of their researchers. More than anything it depends upon their dedication to complete objectivity.
They have alleged that the Saudi-led coalition’s Yemen operation deliberately targeted civilians, particularly children. These are horrific charges. Because of the good work these NGOs have done elsewhere in the world, they carry credibility. But for reasons that can only be conjectured, they are totally wrong. Worse, they are a wickedly unjust slur on a coalition that has been seeking to save lives, most especially the lives of children.
Everyone needs to stick to the facts. The Houthi insurgency in Yemen brought the country to the brink of ruin. Iran wanted the state to collapse into anarchy. It wanted chaos on the Kingdom’s southern border. It wanted to compromise the one regional power strong enough to challenge its meddling in the Arab world. To that end it was prepared to stop at nothing.
The corrupt Yemeni leader, former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, clung to power by exploiting Yemen’s north-south rivalries. Many Yemenis worked in Saudi Arabia sending home their earnings.
The Kingdom had long been the country’s major aid donor. But to stay in power, Saleh’s tribal manipulations seriously damaged his country. The harm was both economic and social. By some measures, Yemen was already a failed state when Iran chose to intervene and sponsor the Houthi insurrection.
The brutality of that rebellion has seen terrible slaughter. Among the dead have been some 10,000 children. And not all of these have been civilians. The Houthi use child soldiers. The mystery is that the Kingdom and its allies are being accused by NGOs of a crime which has been committed by the insurgents.
There may be civilian deaths caused by coalition’s operation. But whereever such deaths have been brought to notice, the coalition has undertaken investigations. It is monstrous to suggest that this loss of civilian life has been caused deliberately.
The Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International assessments are flawed. The “investigators” did not visit Yemen. They did not seek to talk to the coalition. They relied on anecdotal reports. They drew their information from social media. At best they were naïve in their work. At worst they knowingly allowed themselves to be used as a tool against the legitimate government of President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi and its Saudi-led allies.
They have demonstrated no appreciation of the geopolitical forces in play from across the Gulf. The Yemen peace talks in Kuwait are stalled. The Houthis have taken fearful losses. Their military position is desperate. Now they are trying to win back at the negotiating table what they have lost on the battlefield. The guiding hand of Iran is clearly behind this tactic. And a key component is propaganda. Tehran wants to reverse reality. It wants to present the coalition as the aggressor and the Houthi as the victims. For whatever reason, the NGOs’ “investigators” chose to ignore this reality.
From the outset, the Kingdom warned that Washington’s rapprochement with Iran was unwise. The nuclear deal is meaningless. But the removal of economic sanctions means everything to a regime that had almost been brought to its knees. Tehran is now free to meddle in Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. And it is notable that the Obama White House has not sought to seriously question, let alone attack Iranian interference in the Arab world.
These prejudiced reports therefore come at a pivotal moment. They could have been custom-made to strengthen Houthi negotiators at the Kuwait peace talks. In fact, they might even have been drafted in Tehran, they are so one-sided.
They are not transparent and they are not accurate. If fed into the propaganda myth being spun by Iran, they will jeopardize the peace Yemen so badly needs.
At least the UN is now having none of it. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon this week presented the UN’s annual report on children and armed conflict. He said the Saudi-led coalition was not involved in causing the deaths of children in Yemen.
Iran is behind the conspiracy to blacken the name of the Kingdom and its Gulf allies. In mounting the operation, the coalition was acting on behalf of the international community. The least Washington and its allies can do is counter Iranian lies.

Editorial: Iran must not go unpunished

Updated 16 May 2019

Editorial: Iran must not go unpunished

  • Arab News argues that while war is always a last resort, an international response is a must to curb Iranian meddling
  • US strikes worked well when Assad used chemical weapons against his people

The attacks on Tuesday by armed drones on Saudi oil-pumping stations, and two days beforehand on oil tankers off the coast of Fujairah in the UAE, represent a serious escalation on the part of Iran and its proxies, should the initial conclusions of an international investigation prove to be accurate. 

Riyadh has constantly warned world leaders of the dangers that Iran poses, not only to Saudi Arabia and the region, but also to the entire world. This is something former President Obama did not realize until the Iran-backed Houthis attacked the US Navy three times in late 2016. The recent attacks on oil tankers and oil pipelines were aimed at subverting the world economy by hitting directly at the lifeline of today’s world of commerce. Tehran should not get away with any more intimidation, or be allowed to threaten global stability. 

It was in 2008 that the late King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz called upon the US to “cut off the head of the snake,” in reference to the malign activities of Iran. Nearly a decade later, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman referred to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as the “new Hitler of the Middle East.” We are in 2019 and Iran continues to wreak havoc in the region, both directly and through its well armed proxies. Crown Prince Mohammed was therefore clearly correct when he argued that appeasement does not work with the Iranian regime, just as it did not work with Hitler. The next logical step — in this newspaper’s view — should be surgical strikes. The US has set a precedent, and it had a telling effect: The Trump strikes on Syria when the Assad regime used Sarin gas against its people.

We argue this because it is clear that sanctions are not sending the right message. If the Iranian regime were not too used to getting away with their crimes, they would have taken up the offer from President Trump to get on the phone and call him in order to reach a deal that would be in the best interests of the Iranian people themselves. As the two recent attacks indicate, the Iranians insist on disrupting the flow of energy around the world, putting the lives of babies in incubators at risk, threatening hospitals and airports, attacking civilian ships and putting innocent lives in danger. As the case always is with the Iranian leadership, they bury their heads in the sand and pretend that they have done nothing. Nevertheless, investigations indicate that they were behind the attack on our brothers in the UAE while their Houthi militias targeted the Saudi pipelines.

Our point of view is that they must be hit hard. They need to be shown that the circumstances are now different. We call for a decisive, punitive reaction to what happened so that Iran knows that every single move they make will have consequences. The time has come for Iran not only to curb its nuclear weapon ambitions — again in the world’s interest — but also for the world to ensure that they do not have the means to support their terror networks across the region. 

We respect the wise and calm approach of politicians and diplomats calling for investigations to be completed and all other options to be exhausted before heading to war. In the considered view of this newspaper, there has to be deterrent and punitive action in order for Iran to know that no sinister act will go unpunished; that action, in our opinion, should be a calculated surgical strike.