This new regulation is, in fact, forced upon teachers and not based on mutual agreement; therefore, it should be null and void. Any female teacher who agrees to this regulation is doing so out of coercion and not actual consent. She would be forced to take up the position while also financing her accompanying guardian, should she actually have one.  And if she does not, she will remain unemployed, which is wrong and an unfair decision to make.

For that reason, the ministry should attempt to find other viable solutions to this dilemma that are less hindering to female teachers, but rather more facilitating.

The first solution that obviously comes to mind is building special resident housing near the schools for female migrant teachers. This could be done under close supervision of the Ministry of Education to provide protection and security for female residents.

Other solutions must also be found to scale down the number of female teachers who have to seek employment at schools outside their hometowns; especially since there have been far too many fatal accidents involving teachers traveling each day long distances to and from home to schools in remote areas. For example, distance learning can be introduced as an alternative teaching method in remote areas. In that case, the whole issue of female teachers needing to travel daily long distances to work or needing a male legal guardian to escort them would become a non issue, as well as more reasonable and fair.