Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law
Newspapers displayed at a kiosk in Beirut, Lebanon. (File/Getty images)
Short Url
Updated 16 September 2025
Follow

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law

Rights groups urge Lebanon to protect freedom of expression in new media law
  • Proposed amendments risk undermining reform efforts, critics say
  • NGOs urge parliament to abolish criminal defamation, end pretrial detention

BEIRUT: Lebanon’s parliament should ensure that a draft media law it is considering upholds the right to freedom of expression, 14 Lebanese and international rights organizations urged on Tuesday.

This includes decriminalizing defamation, blasphemy, insult and criticism of public officials; prohibiting pretrial detention in speech-related violations; and removing onerous restrictions on the establishment of media outlets.

The calls come as the parliament’s Administration and Justice Committee is set to resume its discussion of the draft law on Tuesday.

On Aug. 31, members of parliament received proposed amendments to the draft law’s text, which, organizations said, included reintroducing pretrial detention and provisions that criminalize insult and defamation.

Rights groups, including Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, Human Rights Watch, and Reporters Without Borders, warned the suggested amendments would further restrict the work of media organizations that are subject to a legal complaint by prohibiting them from publishing materials about the complainant while judicial proceedings are ongoing.

They warned that Lebanon’s criminal defamation laws have been repeatedly used to target and silence government critics, activists and journalists in Lebanon, with journalists repeatedly summoned before security agencies for their work.

“Parliament should ensure that these practices come to an end by passing a media law that is entirely consistent with international human rights standards, including on the right to freedom of expression and media freedom,” the organizations said in a statement.

“Lebanon’s parliament should adopt a media law that includes rights protections that Lebanese rights and media groups have long fought for,” they added.

Rights groups, who reviewed the proposed amendments, opposed the reintroduction of pretrial detention, including “under aggravated circumstances, such as infringing on individuals’ dignity or private lives.”

Pretrial detention is only permissible in Lebanon for offenses that are punishable by more than one year in prison. It is expressly prohibited for media-related offenses in Lebanon’s existing media laws.

“If adopted, such an amendment would be a significant step backward for the protection of the right to freedom of expression and media freedom in Lebanon,” the organizations said.

They noted that the suggested amendment does not specify what “infringing on individuals’ dignity or private lives” entails.

“A vague law that leaves people uncertain of what expression may violate it has a chilling impact on freedom of expression, as people may self-censor out of fear that they might be subject to summons, pretrial detention or eventual prosecution,” they added.

“Vague provisions also leave the law subject to abuse by authorities, who may use them to silence peaceful dissent.”

Such a general legislative ban, they said, would constitute “a serious infringement on the right to freedom of expression.”

The suggested amendments would require licensed television stations to provide the Information Ministry and the National Council for Audiovisual Media with regular reports, including detailed information on the schedule of broadcast programming, and imply that electronic media be subjected to a prior licensing regime rather than a notification regime.

“Unless carefully crafted, such licensing requirements risk allowing for arbitrary decision-making over who can establish and operate media outlets and could facilitate violations of the right to freedom of expression and media freedom,” the statement said.

Lebanon’s parliament began discussing a new media law in 2010 after a former parliament member, Ghassan Moukheiber, and Maharat Foundation, a Beirut-based nongovernmental organization specializing in media and freedom of expression issues, submitted a proposal to amend Lebanon’s outdated Publications Law.

In January 2023, parliament established a subcommittee to study and amend the draft media law, a final version of which was submitted to the Administration and Justice Committee on May 27.

The draft law submitted to the committee in May included advances in protecting the right to freedom of expression in Lebanon, including abolishing pretrial detention and prison sentences for all speech-related violations. It also repealed criminal defamation and insult provisions from Lebanon’s penal code and military judiciary law.

The Administration and Justice Committee started discussions on the latest draft media law on July 29 and has held three meetings on the issue.

However, proposed amendments, introduced to parliament members on Aug. 31, were largely opposed by international rights groups for provisions viewed as restricting media freedom.

Rights groups urged the committee to make its discussions public to ensure transparent legislative debates and facilitate effective public participation.


Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
Updated 05 November 2025
Follow

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author

Israeli prisons treated like another war front after Oct. 7, says freed Palestinian author
  • Brutality rose significantly in last 2 years, says Nasser Abu Srour

DUBAI: Palestinian author Nasser Abu Srour, who was released last month after 32 years in captivity, said torture and brutality inside Israeli prisons had intensified in the past two years, turning detention centers into “another front” of the conflict in Gaza.

Abu Srour was among more than 150 Palestinians serving life sentences who were freed under a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire deal. He was exiled to Egypt, where he was placed in a five-star hotel in Cairo — a jarring contrast, he said, to the conditions he endured during imprisonment.

After Oct. 7, 2023, beatings and deprivation of food and warmth increased in prisons. Even the guards’ uniforms were replaced with ones bearing tags that read “fighters” or “warriors,” he said.

Abu Srour added: “They started acting like they were in a war, and this was another front, and they started beating, torturing, killing like warriors.”

He described how areas without security cameras became “places for brutality,” where guards would tie prisoners’ hands behind their heads, throw them to the ground, and trample on them.

“All cultural life in the prison ended in the last two years,” he said, as all reading and writing materials were confiscated. Daily rations were minimal, and prisoners were only given one set of thin clothes.

He recalled that prisoners were always hungry, and because their bodies were weak they “couldn’t handle even a medium temperature.”

He added: “Whenever someone was leaving prison, everyone would try to become their friends so they would get their T-shirt or underwear, or anything.”

Abu Srour took part in the First Intifada, the Palestinian uprising between 1987 and 1993, when he was charged as an accomplice in the death of an Israeli Shin Bet security officer.

He was sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1993, based on a confession extracted under torture.

In his more than three decades behind bars, Abu Srour completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in political science and turned to writing. He began composing poetry and other works that were smuggled out of prison.

His memoir “The Tale of a Wall: Reflections on Hope and Freedom,” dictated to a relative through phone calls over two years, has been translated into seven languages and is a finalist for the Arab Literature Prize.

After years of torture and unheeded appeals, Abu Srour struggled to believe until the final moment that his name was on the list of prisoners to be released after the Oct. 10 ceasefire.

He said: “They were calling out cell numbers, and I was sitting on my bed in room number six feeling like I am not part of it.

“There were so many times when I should have been part of it over all those years. But the whole thing is so huge and so painful, I didn’t want to interact. It was a defense mechanism.”

The 24 hours before his release were particularly painful, as prisoners were subjected to an intense final round of beatings.

During the 48-hour transfer that followed, prisoners were not allowed to open the curtains on the buses until they reached Egypt.

It was only then that Abu Srour saw the sky for the first time outside prison walls.