Afghanistan-Pakistan peace talks hit impasse after days of negotiations

Special Afghanistan-Pakistan peace talks hit impasse after days of negotiations
Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces, Oct. 15, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 28 October 2025
Follow

Afghanistan-Pakistan peace talks hit impasse after days of negotiations

Afghanistan-Pakistan peace talks hit impasse after days of negotiations
  • Dozens were killed this month in the deadliest fighting between the neighbors
  • Afghan state media said Pakistan ‘appears unwilling to engage seriously’ in talks

KABUL: Peace talks between Afghanistan and Pakistan have hit a deadlock, Afghan state media reported on Tuesday, following days of negotiations in Istanbul, as tensions remained high along the neighbors’ shared border.

The talks in Istanbul, hosted by the Turkish government and facilitated by Qatar, are part of a broader diplomatic push to reach a long-term truce between Islamabad and Kabul, following border clashes earlier this month that killed dozens on both sides, making it their deadliest confrontation in years.

Their first round of negotiations was held on Oct. 19 and hosted by Qatar, which led to a ceasefire agreement.

“The delegation of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has made every effort to conduct constructive and result-oriented dialogues during the ongoing negotiations with Pakistan in Turkey. However, the Pakistani side appears unwilling to engage seriously in the discussions,” state media Radio Television Afghanistan reported on Tuesday.

The Pakistan delegation “seems inclined to withdraw rather than present substantiated arguments at the negotiating table,” it added.

A Pakistani security official, who spoke to Arab News Pakistan on the condition of anonymity, said the Taliban administration has “given no encouraging response” to Islamabad’s demands, therefore “causing a deadlock” in the negotiations.

The Afghan delegation recognizes the validity of Pakistan’s demands but is “not fully willing” to accept them, the official said, adding the Afghan delegation is repeatedly consulting the administration in Kabul and acting on its instructions.

Afghanistan’s Ministry of Affairs and the office of the government’s spokesperson did not immediately respond to Arab News’ requests for comments.

The current Afghanistan-Pakistan instability appears to be linked to Islamabad’s relations with the US, experts say.

“This instability also aligns with certain interests of the United States, which has historically partnered with Pakistan to counterbalance any emerging powers that could influence Central Asia or challenge China. In this context, weak governments and the presence of radical groups serve as tools to maintain regional volatility,” said Abdul Hameed Jalili, former refugee affairs attache to Pakistan.

Clashes between Afghan and Pakistani forces along the Durand Line — their 2,640-km border — have occurred for decades but intensified after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, following the withdrawal of US-led troops.

Pakistan accuses the Afghan Taliban of sheltering fighters from the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan and allowing them to stage cross-border attacks — a charge Afghanistan denies, saying it does not allow its territory to be used against other countries.

The exchange of fire that started earlier this month was triggered by an unclaimed explosion in Kabul and another in the southeastern province of Paktika, for which the Afghan government blamed the Pakistani military.

“The current disputes are not confined to the TTP. Even prior to the TTP’s emergence, Pakistan has pursued foreign-backed initiatives aimed at influencing the region. By leveraging the TTP as a pretext and taking advantage of internal dissatisfaction with the Taliban government, Pakistan appears to be exploiting every opportunity to prolong instability in Afghanistan,” Jalili added.

Pakistan’s reported security arrangements with the US are “one of the major obstacles” in reaching an agreement, according to Abdul Saboor Mubariz, board member of the Center for Strategic and Regional Studies in Kabul.

“Afghanistan wants Pakistan to guarantee that its land will not be used by any state or group — particularly the United States or Daesh — to threaten Afghanistan’s security. Pakistan, meanwhile, is pressing Kabul for equally strong guarantees that the TTP will not find sanctuary or support in Afghanistan,” he told Arab News.

“Without credible and enforceable assurances from both sides, any sustainable peace deal will remain out of reach. Pakistan continues to serve US interests in the region and may even see Daesh as a useful tool to exert pressure on Afghanistan, further complicating the path to stability.”


EU in last-minute talks to set new climate goal for COP30

EU in last-minute talks to set new climate goal for COP30
Updated 25 min 49 sec ago
Follow

EU in last-minute talks to set new climate goal for COP30

EU in last-minute talks to set new climate goal for COP30
  • EU ministers meet to try to pass new climate target
  • Bloc’s credibility at risk ahead of COP30 climate talks

BRUSSELS: EU climate ministers will make a last-ditch attempt to pass a new climate change target on Tuesday, in an effort to avoid going to the UN COP30 summit in Brazil empty-handed.
Failure to agree could undermine the European Union’s claims to leadership at the COP30 talks, which will test the will of major economies to keep fighting climate change despite opposition from US President Donald Trump.
Countries including China, Britain and Australia have already submitted new climate targets ahead of COP30.
But the EU, which has some of the world’s most ambitious CO2-cutting policies, has struggled to contain a backlash from industries and governments skeptical that it can afford the measures alongside defense and industrial priorities. EU members failed to agree a 2040 climate target in September, leaving them scrambling for a deal days before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meets other world leaders at COP30 in Belem, Brazil, on November 6.
“The geopolitical landscape has rarely been more complex,” EU climate policy chief Wopke Hoekstra told a gathering of climate ministers in Canada on Saturday, adding that he was confident the bloc would approve its new goal.
“The European Union will continue to do its utmost, even under these circumstances, in Belem to uphold its commitment to multilateralism and to the Paris Agreement,” he said.
The starting point for talks is a European Commission proposal to cut net EU greenhouse gas emissions by 90 percent from 1990 levels by 2040, to keep countries on track for net-zero by 2050.
Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic are among those warning this is too restrictive for domestic industries struggling with high energy costs, cheaper Chinese imports and US tariffs.
Others, including the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden, cite worsening extreme weather and the need to catch up with China in manufacturing green technologies as reasons for ambitious goals. The draft compromise ministers will discuss, seen by Reuters, includes a clause demanded by France allowing a weakening of the 2040 goal in future, if it becomes clear EU forests are not absorbing enough CO2 to meet it. Brussels has also vowed to change other measures to attempt to win buy-in for the climate goal. These include controlling prices in an upcoming carbon market and considering weakening its 2035 combustion engine ban as requested by Germany.
A deal on Tuesday will require ministers to agree on the share of the 90 percent emissions cut countries can cover by buying foreign carbon credits — effectively softening efforts required by domestic industries.
France has said credits should cover 5 percent, more than the 3 percent share originally proposed by the Commission. Other governments argue money would be better spent on supporting European industries than buying foreign CO2 credits.
Support from at least 15 of the 27 EU members is needed to pass the goal. EU diplomats said on Monday the vote would be tight and could depend on one or two flipping positions.
Ministers will try first to agree the 2040 goal, and from that derive an emissions pledge for 2035 — which is what the UN asked countries to submit ahead of COP30.