https://arab.news/858rd
The Rohingya are drowning because the world has decided that containment is easier than solutions. Nearly 900 Rohingya refugees died or disappeared at sea last year, according to the UN Refugee Agency, making 2025 the deadliest year on record for Rohingya attempting maritime escape routes across the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea.
Thousands more are attempting the same crossings this year. These are not isolated tragedies caused simply by criminal smuggling gangs or dangerous weather conditions. They are the predictable outcome of an international policy framework that has trapped more than a million people in permanent limbo without rights, citizenship, education or any meaningful future.
For years, governments have congratulated themselves for preventing another immediate catastrophe after the mass displacement of Rohingya from Myanmar in 2017. Humanitarian aid was mobilized. Refugee camps were expanded in Bangladesh. International courts opened investigations into genocide allegations against Myanmar’s military leaders. Yet beneath this appearance of international engagement lies a deeper truth: the world never developed a genuine long-term solution for the Rohingya crisis. Instead, it settled for containment.
The world never developed a genuine long-term solution for the Rohingya crisis. Instead, it settled for containment
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim
Containment means keeping the Rohingya alive but politically invisible. It means warehousing refugees indefinitely in overcrowded camps while ensuring they cannot legally integrate, work, travel freely or build independent futures. It means expecting Bangladesh to shoulder an impossible burden while donor fatigue steadily reduces the resources available to sustain even basic living standards. It means treating the Rohingya as a humanitarian management issue rather than a political problem requiring structural resolution.
The consequences are now becoming deadly.
In Cox’s Bazar, where nearly 1 million Rohingya refugees live in densely packed camps, conditions continue to deteriorate. Food aid cuts driven by declining international donor contributions have pushed many families deeper into desperation. Opportunities for formal education and employment remain extremely limited. Young Rohingya who have spent nearly a decade in the camps increasingly see no path toward dignity or self-sufficiency.
At the same time, Myanmar itself remains fundamentally unsafe for return. The junta continues to wage a brutal civil war across the country. Rakhine State has become an active conflict zone between the military and the Arakan Army. Entire communities remain displaced. Infrastructure has collapsed.
Most importantly, the political conditions that enabled the genocide against the Rohingya have not fundamentally changed. Citizenship rights remain unresolved. Accountability remains incomplete. The ideological structures of exclusion remain firmly embedded within Myanmar’s political system.
The international community nevertheless continues to repeat the fiction of “safe repatriation,” while doing almost nothing to create the conditions that would actually make return possible.
This leaves the Rohingya trapped between two impossibilities: they cannot safely return home, but they are also denied any meaningful future where they currently reside.
When viewed through this lens, the rise in deadly sea journeys is entirely rational. People do not board overcrowded boats with their children because they misunderstand the dangers. They do so because the alternative appears even worse: permanent hopelessness.
The demographics of these sea crossings reveal the depth of the crisis. Increasingly, women and children make up a large proportion of those attempting the journeys. Entire families are now risking death at sea because they no longer believe the camps offer survival with dignity. This is not merely an economic migration trend. It is an indictment of a failed international strategy.
Regional governments have also contributed to the crisis through deterrence policies that prioritize pushing refugees away rather than creating lawful protection pathways. Southeast Asian states frequently deny landing rights or delay rescue operations for Rohingya boats in the hope that another country will assume responsibility. Refugees are often left stranded at sea for weeks with little food or water. Smuggling and trafficking networks flourish precisely because legal migration channels do not exist.
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ response has been especially weak. The organization’s doctrine of noninterference has effectively paralyzed meaningful regional action on Myanmar. While ASEAN repeatedly issues statements expressing concern, it has failed to generate any coherent strategy capable of addressing either the roots of Myanmar’s collapse or the growing refugee crisis spilling out across the region.
This paralysis is increasingly dangerous not only for the Rohingya but for regional stability itself.
The Rohingya cannot safely return home, but they are also denied any meaningful future where they currently reside
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim
Protracted refugee crises create ideal conditions for criminal trafficking networks, arms smuggling, human exploitation and extremist recruitment. Desperation is one of the most powerful fuels for instability. Young people who grow up stateless, excluded and abandoned become vulnerable to exploitation by transnational criminal and militant actors. The continued deterioration of conditions in Rohingya camps is therefore not merely a humanitarian issue. It is a long-term security threat for the entire region.
The international community still has options to prevent further catastrophe, but doing so requires abandoning the fantasy that the current containment strategy is sustainable.
First, donor governments must urgently restore and expand humanitarian funding for Rohingya refugees. Aid reductions may appear fiscally minor in Western capitals, but in the camps they translate directly into hunger, desperation and increased pressure to flee.
Second, Bangladesh should receive far greater international support to expand educational and livelihood opportunities for refugees. Preventing an entire generation from acquiring skills, education and economic opportunity only deepens future instability.
Third, regional governments must create lawful protection pathways and coordinated maritime rescue mechanisms to prevent further mass deaths at sea. Refugees should not have to rely on traffickers because legal alternatives are absent.
Finally, the international community must stop pretending that repatriation alone is a sufficient answer. Without citizenship guarantees, legal protections, accountability mechanisms and political inclusion inside Myanmar, return cannot be safe or sustainable.
The Rohingya crisis is no longer simply a story about genocide. It is now also a story about what happens when the world responds to genocide with indefinite containment rather than political courage.
Every boat leaving the shores of Bangladesh carries a simple message: survival without hope is not enough.
- Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is the director of special initiatives at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington. X: @AzeemIbrahim