Our children are contaminated with chemicals! (Part 1)

Updated 11 June 2014
0

Our children are contaminated with chemicals! (Part 1)

I have written several articles about toxic chemicals, environmental pollutants, radiation, heavy metals and other contaminants in the last few years. To the disappointment of many, the relevant agencies are not interested in paying heed or even willing to read. Hundreds of scientists, doctors, parents and activists worldwide have voiced and expressed their fears and sounded the warning sirens. Unfortunately, their calls have also fallen on deaf ears.
However, I will not give up. I am going to let out a scream from the depth of my being, the way Edvard Münch, the famous 19th century German impressionist, expressed it with his painting brush in the well-known painting, “The Scream.” Maybe then the authorities, organizations, agencies, scientists, doctors, industrialists and governments will awaken to respond to prevent the explosion of an uncontainable human and ecological disaster.
Today, it is about how toxins reach children. I will elaborate on the many ways children are getting bombarded daily with synthetic chemicals (food additives, artificial sweeteners…), toxins, plastics, paint, through pesticide-sprayed homes and produce, commercial meat and poultry (antibiotics, hormones), polluted air (fumes, exhaust), bottled and contaminated tap water (plastics, heavy metals), smoking parents, skin care products, drugs (antibiotics), vaccines (mercury, preservatives, animal and human tissues), cleaning agents (detergents), radiation and other hidden or seemingly innocent products, putting their systems off balance and slowly poisoning their brains and bodies.
To be fair, viral and bacterial infections, diseases and epidemics have become considerably reduced and controlled in the last half of the 20th century due to cleaner food, water and environment and better health care systems. However, in recent years, we see and experience the emergence of different types of disabling disorders, such as autoimmune disorders, allergies and cancer, due to modern-day contaminants, once uncommon to our communities and to us.
According to Dr. Philipp T. Landrigan, paediatrician, epidemiologist, and director of the Children’s Environmental Health Center at Mount Sanai School of Medicine, asthma attacks in children have tripled in the last decades, becoming quite common reasons for admittance in hospitals as well as causes for school absenteeism.
Another disturbing condition recently seen is the development of cancer in consequence to injuries, which is also one of the foremost causes of death in children in the United States. Other types of cancer that have also risen to 40 percent in the last 30 years are leukemia (cancer of the blood) and cancer of the brain. Some cases are curable, but others are not as fortunate.
Developmental and behavioral disorders have escalated in the US and Saudi Arabia. These range from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), attention deficit disorder (ADD), dyslexia and other learning disabilities and behavioral disorders to autism and mental retardation. More American children are diagnosed with autism, reaching one child in every 88 children, becoming the second most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in America, and it is rising. Autistic children lack the ability to communicate normally with people (even their parents) and form normal relationships with their families or others. They require special care, love, understanding, special coaching, and one-to-one attention. Unless the condition is addressed early enough, these children carry their disabilities to adulthood.
Reproductive disorders due to birth defects in male newborns, called hypospadias (shorter distance between rectum and testicles), have become more frequent lately. According to a study headed by Shanna Swan of the University of Rochester, New York, exposure of male fetuses in utero (before birth) through mothers to softening agents (phthalates) in plastics cause such genital dysfunctions and defects and sterility.
In the last decades, obesity in children has risen four-folds in most industrial countries, led by the US. The Gulf countries have followed suit and surpassed such countries, exceeding 40 percent of their populations. For those of us who are unaware of the harms of obesity, I would like to explain that visceral (belly) fat releases inflammatory (toxic) chemicals that lead to metabolic syndromes (diabetes type 2, hypertension, arterial plaque, cancer) even in young children. Diabetes type 2 was literally unheard of in children before the fast-food trend. Now children and adolescents have also become victims of the disorder, even though metabolic syndromes were rarely seen in young children.
Because diabetes 2 has reached a record high, “becoming an epidemic,” Dr. Landrigan urges to address such chronic disorders. Parents, schools, and regulatory agencies should work to reduce the exposure of children to pure sugars, refined and processed foods, trans fats, chemicals, plastics, and environmental and industrial toxins.
Baby formula bottles and nipples, baby shampoos, and body care products all contain toxic ingredients that are cumulatively damaging to babies and children’s health. Proactive parents are calling for the discontinuation of the use of harmful chemicals in baby products, wear, fabrics, toys, upholstery, and furniture. Because of fear of boycott or drop in sales, certain smart manufacturers in the US have taken action to stop the use of some of the harmful products (to protect their business!), but they (unscrupulously) continued exporting the old types to Third World countries.
Due to their smaller bodies and undeveloped systems, infants and children are at a much higher risk than adults to becoming contaminated by toxic material. They are daily exposed to thousands of synthetic chemicals in their environments; some we know of and others we don’t. Everyday, new untested chemicals are added to baby and adult foods as additives (coloring, taste enhancers, stabilizers, preservatives, emulsifiers, artificial sweeteners, flavors). Other dangerous toxins are included in the manufacturing of kitchenware (coating of pots and pans), plastic water bottles and other house-ware products. They are also found in personal care products (shampoos, lotions), fabrics of children’s wear (flame-retardants), cleaning agents, paints, glues, toys, furnishing, textile, carpets, pesticides and more.
According Dr. Landrigan, such harmful “chemicals have never been tested for toxicity” on children or adults. Moreover, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not regulate them. Of course, the Saudi FDA does not have an independent view from American FDA.
Dr. Landrigan explains that for their weights and smaller bodies, children drink “more water, eat more food, and breathe more than adults,” making them more exposed to contaminated water (heavy metals, fluoride), food additives (colorings, flavors), artificial sweeteners, toxic chemicals, plastics, environmental pollutants, fumes, car exhaust, heavy metals and industrial waste. Moreover, children’s body are not well equipped to detoxify from such poisonous substances. Infants, in particular, have systems that are not mature enough to filter out toxins, making them more susceptible to all kinds of toxicity.
Next week, InshaAllah, I will continue discussing the effects of chemicals on human health and especially on foetuses, infants, children and adolescents. It is our duty as parents and caregivers to do our best to make sure our children are kept healthy and safe by protecting their health and wellbeing in order to see them become healthy, productive and constructive adults as well as protect the continuity of the human species in at least the way it was passed over to us.

References:
• Chemical in Everyday Products and Children’s Health by Philip J. Landrigan, MD
• Planet in Peril by Anderson, Animal Planet’s Jeff Corwin, and Sanjay Gupta for CNN
• Interview with vaccine researcher (refused to be named) by Jon Rappoport (www.nomorefakenews.com)
• Autism Statistics – mindspec.org

N.B.:
Individuals with medical conditions or on medication should consult their physicians when they decide to introduce anything new in their diet even if it is natural.

The previous Health Solutions articles are located at www. arabnews.com

Email: [email protected]


Restaurants could be 1st to get genetically modified salmon

Updated 21 June 2019
0

Restaurants could be 1st to get genetically modified salmon

  • The salmon produced by AquaBounty are the first genetically modified animals approved for human consumption in the US
  • They represent one way companies are pushing to transform the plants and animals we eat, even as consumer advocacy groups call for greater caution

NEW YORK: Inside an Indiana aquafarming complex, thousands of salmon eggs genetically modified to grow faster than normal are hatching into tiny fish. After growing to roughly 10 pounds (4.5 kilograms) in indoor tanks, they could be served in restaurants by late next year.
The salmon produced by AquaBounty are the first genetically modified animals approved for human consumption in the US. They represent one way companies are pushing to transform the plants and animals we eat, even as consumer advocacy groups call for greater caution.
AquaBounty hasn’t sold any fish in the US yet, but it says its salmon may first turn up in places like restaurants or university cafeterias, which would decide whether to tell diners that the fish are genetically modified.
“It’s their customer, not ours,” said Sylvia Wulf, AquaBounty’s CEO.
To produce its fish, Aquabounty injected Atlantic salmon with DNA from other fish species that make them grow to full size in about 18 months, which could be about twice as fast as regular salmon. The company says that’s more efficient since less feed is required. The eggs were shipped to the US from the company’s Canadian location last month after clearing final regulatory hurdles.
As AquaBounty worked through years of government approvals, several grocers including Kroger and Whole Foods responded to a campaign by consumer groups with a vow to not sell the fish.
Already, most corn and soy in the US is genetically modified to be more resistant to pests and herbicides. But as genetically modified salmon make their way to dinner plates, the pace of change to the food supply could accelerate.
This month, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to simplify regulations for genetically engineered plants and animals. The move comes as companies are turning to a newer gene-editing technology that makes it easier to tinker with plant and animal DNA.
That’s blurring the lines around what should be considered a genetically modified organism, and how such foods are perceived. In 2015, an Associated Press-GfK poll found two-thirds of Americans supported labeling of genetically modified ingredients on food packages. The following year, Congress directed regulators to establish national standards for disclosing the presence of bioengineered foods.
But foods made with the newer gene-editing technique wouldn’t necessarily be subject to the regulation, since companies say the resulting plants and animals could theoretically be produced with conventional breeding. And while AquaBounty’s salmon was produced with an older technique, it may not always be obvious when people are buying the fish either.
The disclosure regulation will start being implemented next year, but mandatory compliance doesn’t start until 2022. And under the rules , companies can provide the disclosures through codes people scan with their phones. The disclosure also would note that products have “bioengineered” ingredients, which advocacy groups say could be confusing.
“Nobody uses that term,” said Amy van Saun of the Center for Food Safety, who noted “genetically engineered” or “genetically modified” are more common.
The center is suing over the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval of AquaBounty’s salmon, and it is among the groups that asked grocers to pledge they wouldn’t sell the fish.
The disclosure rules also do not apply to restaurants and similar food service establishments. Greg Jaffe of the Center for Science in the Public Interest noted that AquaBounty’s fish will represent a tiny fraction of the US salmon supply, and that many people may not care whether they’re eating genetically modified food. Still, he said restaurants could make the information available to customers who ask about it.
“The information should not be hidden,” Jaffe said.
AquaBounty’s Wulf noted its salmon has already been sold in Canada, where disclosure is not required. She said the company believes in transparency but questioned why people would want to know whether the fish are genetically modified.
“It’s identical to Atlantic salmon, with the exception of one gene,” she said.