Indian summer for Dhoni
Indian summer for Dhoni
In 2009, his second full year as Test captain, he led India to the No.1 ranking. And by the time he handed over leadership in the white-ball formats to Virat Kohli last January, he had swept the board — the World Twenty20 in 2007, the World Cup in 2011, and the Champions Trophy in 2013.
Dhoni walked away from Test cricket after the Boxing Day game in Melbourne in 2014. He had received few bouquets and many brickbats as India’s form had slumped following that World Cup triumph. Legends made way, and those that came in took time to find their feet. In that transition phase, India were routed 4-0 in Test series in both England and Australia.
But as patchy as limited-overs form might have been in bilateral series, India invariably turned up at the big events. And Dhoni’s nous was a big part of that. Whether it was guiding the bowlers from behind the stumps, or giving DRS advice to Kohli, the new leader, it didn’t take long for the new captain-coach combinations — it was Kohli and Anil Kumble in January, it is Kohli and Ravi Shastri now — to decide that he still had much to offer.
Between the slickness of his wicket-keeping and the accolades that his captaincy has won, Dhoni the batsman has often been overlooked. In the 50-over format, the numbers brook no argument. He has been one of the titans of the ODI game, scoring 9,891 runs at 51.78. The strike-rate of 88.43 is comparable to the best.
In other circumstances, without the twin burdens of keeping and captaincy, Dhoni might have been a top-order great. He averaged 82.75 from 16 innings at No.3 — including his highest score of 183 not out — and 58.23 from 26 innings at No.4.
But the bulk of his runs have come from No.6, which is where he finds himself now, tasked either with providing the finishing flourish, or with resuscitating an innings in decay. There is little doubt that he is now more suited for the second role. Dhoni is not an AB de Villiers or Jos Buttler that he can walk in and tee off from the first ball he faces. He likes to take his time, gauge the conditions, and construct an innings. In high-scoring matches, that is a high-risk strategy that relies heavily on catching up once he is set. It also puts a lot of pressure on the batsmen at the other end.
On a bad day, such as the one India had in Dharamsala yesterday, the Dhoni method works perfectly. The scoreboard showed 16 for 4 when he arrived at the crease. He scored two off the first 18 balls he faced, as India slumped to an embarrassing 29 for 7. Thereafter, with the tail for company, he was in his element, manipulating the strike and unveiling the big hits at regular intervals. In an innings where the others managed just seven fours between them, Dhoni struck ten fours and two huge sixes. He was last man out, for 65 off 87 balls, with the total having been boosted to 112.
For India, the worrying thing is the lack of alternatives. Dinesh Karthik can keep wicket, but plays as a batsman. In 66 innings spread over 13 years, he averages less than 30. Rishabh Pant, part of the side that reached the Under-19 World Cup final in 2016, made waves last season, but has struggled for consistency this term. Sanju Samson, once touted as an alternative, is only just back among the runs.
In conditions like India encountered in Dharamsala, when the new ball seams around prodigiously, Dhoni’s unorthodox technique is often remarkably effective. In the innings defeats at Old Trafford and The Oval in 2014, as the rest of the batsmen were blown away by Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad, it was Dhoni that was top scorer, trusting his eye and playing as late as possible.
On typical Asian pitches where scores well in excess of 300 have become the norm, Dhoni the batsman can struggle to impose himself. But when scoring runs becomes a battle, he’s still one of the go-to men. In the high altitude of Dharamsala, with Kohli away preparing for a Tuscan wedding and the newer faces clueless against the kind of lateral movement usually associated with the English summer, Dhoni illustrated just why he remains a vital cog in the ODI machine.
‘Good, but not good enough’: Juan Antonio Pizzi on Saudi Arabia’s defeat to Uruguay
- A Luis Suaréz goal midway through the first half gave Uruguay a 1-0 win
- Pizzi had spoken passionately about the need for his side to demonstrate a higher level of focus and performance
ROSTOV-ON-DON: Good, but not good enough.
That was what Juan Antonio Pizzi stated as he declared himself pleased with his team’s performance in the 1-0 defeat to Uruguay on Wednesday night.
But he lamented his side’s lack of firepower as they exited the World Cup after just two matches.
Pizzi had spoken passionately about the need for his side to demonstrate a higher level of focus and performance in Rostov-on-Don after losing their opening game 5-0 to hosts Russia in Moscow last week.
The Argentine got his wish with a display that saw the Green Falcons fight throughout and edge possession against a Uruguay side ranked 14th in the world.
A Luis Suaréz goal midway through the first half after poor goalkeeping from Mohammed Al-Owais, however, was enough to hand the Green Falcons a 12th successive World Cup defeat.
The result means that even with a win against Egypt on Monday, the Green Falcons are no longer capable of progressing to the knock-out stages from Group A.
“We had a lot of ball possession and were able to impose our style of play and distribution,” said Pizzi. “We conceded a goal from a random play and didn’t have the weapons or tools to try to equalize. We kept the ball well and weren’t really troubled defensively, but lacked that ability to score.”
Indeed, for all their possession, Saudi Arabia have managed just three shots on target in 180 minutes of football. Against Russia, they failed to muster a single effort on target and the managed just three against Uruguay, two of which came in the final minutes when they knew they had to score or face elimination. None of the three shots came from a striker.
“This is our weakness. We have good ball possession, but no effectiveness. We lack the depth and skill required to win these games,” Pizzi added. “We have that deficiency and have looked for solutions, but we haven’t quite come up with one yet. But that is one of the reasons great forward are in high demand and are the elite players in world football.”
Pizzi had made four changes ahead of the match, dropping goalkeeper Abdullah Al-Mayouf in favor of Al-Owais and introducing Ali Al-Bulayhi at the heart of the defense alongside Osama Hawsawi. Further upfield, Hattan Bahberi came in for Yahya Al-Shehri and Fahad Al-Muwallad replaced Mohammed Al-Sahlawi. The changes, particularly the inclusion of Bahberi, seemed to give the side more impetus in midfield.
“The difference between the performance in the first game and this game is enormous,” Pizzi said. “The only way to compete at this level is to play at the level we did here. And even then it was not enough even to get a draw. Undoubtedly there were other factors aside from the pressure of playing in the opening game that made a difference, but it’s true that the difference was enormous.”
Many critics had predicted a deluge of goals from the likes of Suarez and Cavani, yet both were kept at bay. Save for a couple of half-chances early on, neither came close to scoring until the 23rd minute.
A corner from Carlos Sanchez sailed into the area and when Al-Owais came for it but failed to connect with his punch, Barcelona forward Suaréz was left with the simplest of tap-ins. He was so caught off-guard, he actually looked surprised as he reeled away in celebration.
“I believe you cannot be relaxed in any match,” Suarez said when asked by a Uruguayan journalist whether he had taken it easy against the Saudis.
“We wanted to win and to progress to the knock-out stage and this game simply showed how difficult it is. That’s the World Cup for you though and we are obviously delighted with how we have performed so far to progress.”
Uruguay coach Oscar Tabarez did not share his striker’s sentiments.
“Saudi Arabia wanted to excel and give a better account of themselves after losing to Russia,” he said.
“They did that very well and we have to respect them. But what surprised me the most is how we played. We underperformed.”