Search form

Last updated: 2 min 31 sec ago

You are here

Behind the protests, the real demand is for regime change

Three days of protests in Iran against the high rates of inflation, rising food prices and a general trend of economic mismanagement began with an incident earlier in the week in the city of Isfahan, after the announcement that 27,000 workers had been fired because a number of companies had been declared bankrupt.
Such negative developments contribute to an economic situation that is dire for much of the Iranian population, in spite of the fact that the 2015 nuclear agreement with six world powers has returned large quantities of frozen assets to the Islamic Republic, and brought new business to a variety of government-linked firms.
This misalignment between the fortunes of the Iranian regime and the ordinary population has contributed to the sentiments that were expressed in the past three days of protests. Many of the thousands of demonstrators blamed government corruption for a significant portion of the hardships they were facing. At times, the crowds chanted: “If you stop one case of embezzlement, our problems will be solved.”
Other slogans specifically named Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, some of them expressing regret at having voted for the supposedly moderate politician, who was elected to a second term in May with promises of domestic reform. Little has been done to follow through on those promises, either with regard to economic indicators or the suppression of free speech throughout the country.
Although inflation fell after following Rouhani’s successful pursuit of the nuclear agreement, it has since rebounded. The return to a rate of over 10 percent was widely cited as one of the grievances of this week’s protesters, alongside a similar rebound in the official national unemployment rate, to a rate of 12.4 percent.
Also of concern was the vast expenditure of Iranian wealth in foreign conflicts and in the support of terrorist proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon. Earlier in December, Rouhani presented the draft budget for the Iranian calendar year from March 2018 to March 2019. It included additional billions of dollars in allocations to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its elite foreign special operations branch, the Quds Force. Indeed, analyzes of the budget identify those entities as major priorities for the Iranian government, including its supposedly moderate president.
The National Council of Resistance of Iran said the latest protests were expressions not only of escalating frustration with economic indicators, but also a growing desire for regime change. Its president, Maryam Rajavi, said: “The heroic uprising … in large parts of Iran has once again proved that the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime and the establishment of democracy and the rule of the people is a national and public demand.” Rajavi went on to say that in the absence of such regime change, the fortunes of the Iranian people would only continue to decline, due in part to the existing government’s misplaced priorities and institutionalized corruption.
“While the overwhelming majority of the people of Iran are suffering from poverty, inflation and unemployment, most of the country’s wealth and revenues is spent on military and security apparatuses and military and regional interventions, or is being looted by the regime leaders or goes into their bank accounts,” she said.

Demonstrators in Iran this week have protested about rising prices and economic disparity, but their target is the Iranian government itself.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh

The NCRI is a coalition of Iranian resistance groups, most prominent being the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), which is banned by the clerical regime but continues to maintain an intelligence network throughout the country. That network has been largely responsible for the release of information to Western media about this week’s protests. In addition to communicating the activities and demands of participating activists, the network has also focused attention on the government’s backlash against the demonstrations, which Iranian officials have evidently tried to conceal. The governor of Mashhad, Mohammad Rahim Norouzian, told Iranian state media that the police had treated the unannounced gatherings with “great tolerance” and that the only activists arrested were those who had been planning to damage government property.
However, images and video on social media showed security forces firing tear gas and water cannon into crowds of peaceful demonstrators. Some activists were photographed with bloody faces after direct clashes with police.
Throughout Rouhani’s more than four years as president, the Iranian public has been subject to an escalating crackdown, involving mass arrests of activists, journalists, partygoers, and other advocates of liberal society. Despite this fact, there have been thousands of protests in the past year alone, with many of them described as “anti-government” protests.
These incidents and the often violent response of Iranian security forces are reminiscent of the 2009 Green Movement protests that emerged from disputes over the election in which hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad secured a second term in office. After those nationwide demonstrations were suppressed, its recognized leaders were placed under indefinite house arrest.
The release of Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi was among the most prominent and popular promises made by Rouhani both during his first presidential campaign in 2013, and his reelection campaign this year. In both instances, Rouhani quickly downplayed those promises upon winning election, leading to widespread condemnation of the president as having turned his back on his supporters.
This criticism was certainly raised once again in this week’s protests, in the form of chants that criticized the Iranian government for “leaving the people.”
Whereas the defined context of that statement was the recent widening in wealth disparity between the people and the government, it is likely that for many demonstrators this was an expression of much broader frustration with the clerical regime.
• Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist. He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and president of the International American Council. He serves on the boards of the Harvard International Review, the Harvard International Relations Council and the US-Middle East Chamber for Commerce and Business. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh