THE numerous religious programs on TV channels during the holy month of Ramadan seem to be appropriate and timely. These programs should be welcomed and encouraged because they are in line with ethos of the fasting month. They are definitely better and purposeful than soap operas, which are replete with obscene scenes.
The broadcast of these programs is testimony to the fact that the viewers are keen to know more about their religion. This is what we notice on the surface. However, if we look at the issue with more depth, then we find that they prove to be counterproductive.
To make it clear, let me repeat the plea made by Sheikh Salman Al-Audah in his famous TV program “Corner Stone” a year ago when he urged viewers not to ask simple questions, the answers of which they could find if they refer to religious books available in bookstores. He asked people not to depend on him for answers but to be more independent and positive, and to read fiqh (jurisprudence) books to find answers.
“Be like me in your quest for knowledge. Be serious researchers. This is not impossible if you put in a little effort,” he said.
This is a great call reflecting the realization of Sheikh Al-Audah to the hazard of depending on religious programs for fatwas.
Such programs have become an incentive for lethargy. An ordinary Muslim has no patience for serious reading or research. He does not want to put in any effort to know the teachings of his religion in depth which would help follow Islam in a better way. He has substituted the serious hunt for knowledge by a simple method that would not cost him anything beyond a telephone call to a TV channel to get whatever information he needs.
This has led Muslims to depend on the minds of others for knowledge about their religion. This is totally against the preaching of Islam, which makes it imperative on Muslims to be independent from all ethical, spiritual and intellectual aspects.
Spectators have become completely dependent on these programs and stopped applying their minds on simple religious matters. The paradox is that some scholars who present such programs feel very happy to answer these simple questions when they should feel irritated for being forced to repeat themselves.
We need to build instruments for thinking rather than getting easy and ready-made answers. I wish all our scholars were like Sheikh Al-Audah who encourages people to read and collect their own answers.
