Iran, US nuclear talks end in Oman, next round to be announced

Iran, US nuclear talks end in Oman, next round to be announced
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference following a meeting with Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, April 18, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 11 May 2025
Follow

Iran, US nuclear talks end in Oman, next round to be announced

Iran, US nuclear talks end in Oman, next round to be announced
  • Iran said “indirect talks were difficult but useful to better understand each other’s positions”
  • Senior Trump administration official said discussions lasted more than three hours

DUBAI: Fresh talks between Iranian and US negotiators to resolve disputes over Tehran’s nuclear program ended in Oman on Sunday with further negotiations planned, officials said, as Tehran insisted in public on continuing uranium enrichment.

Though Tehran and Washington both have said they prefer diplomacy to resolve the decades-long nuclear dispute, they remain deeply divided on several red lines that negotiators will have to circumvent to reach a new nuclear deal and avert future military action.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said the latest round of “indirect talks were difficult but useful to better understand each other’s positions.”

In a post on the X platform, he added that the time and venue of the next round of negotiations would be announced by Muscat.

A senior official from President Donald Trump’s administration said Sunday’s “direct and indirect” discussions had lasted more than three hours.

“We are encouraged by today’s outcome and look forward to our next meeting, which will happen in the near future,” the official said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff held the fourth round of talks in Muscat through Omani mediators, despite Washington taking a tough stance in public that Iranian officials said would not help the negotiations.

On Thursday, Witkoff told Breitbart News that Washington’s red line is: “No enrichment. That means dismantlement, no weaponization,” requiring the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan.

“If they are not productive on Sunday, then they won’t continue and we’ll have to take a different route,” Witkoff said about the talks.

TRUMP’S MIDDLE EAST VISIT

The fourth round of talks took place ahead of Trump’s Middle East visit. Trump, who has threatened military action against Iran if diplomacy fails, has restored a “maximum pressure” campaign on Tehran since returning to the White House in January.

Reacting to Witkoff’s comments, Araqchi said on Sunday Iran would not compromise on its nuclear rights, which include uranium enrichment.

Tehran is willing to negotiate some curbs on its nuclear work in return for the lifting of sanctions, according to Iranian officials, but ending its enrichment program or surrendering its enriched uranium stockpile are among “Iran’s red lines that could not be compromised” in the talks.

A senior Iranian official close to the negotiating team said that US demands for “zero enrichment and dismantling Iran’s nuclear sites would not help in progressing the negotiations.”

“What the US says publicly differs from what is said in negotiations,” the official said, on condition of anonymity.

Moreover, Iran has flatly ruled out negotiating its ballistic missile program and the clerical establishment demands watertight guarantees Trump would not again ditch a nuclear pact.

Trump exited Tehran’s 2015 nuclear pact with six world powers in 2018 during his first term and reimposed tough sanctions that have devastated Iran’s economy.

Iran, which has long said its nuclear program is peaceful, has breached the 2015 pact’s nuclear curbs since 2019, including “dramatically” accelerating its enrichment of uranium to up to 60 percent purity, close to the roughly 90 percent level that is weapons-grade, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.


UN: Two million Syrians returned home since Assad’s fall

UN: Two million Syrians returned home since Assad’s fall
Updated 24 min 8 sec ago
Follow

UN: Two million Syrians returned home since Assad’s fall

UN: Two million Syrians returned home since Assad’s fall
  • The Syrian civil war, which erupted in 2011, displaced half of the population internally or abroad
  • But Assad’s December 8 ouster at the hands of Islamist forces sparked hopes of return

BEIRUT: Over two million Syrians who had fled their homes during their country’s war have returned since the ouster of Bashar Assad, UN refugee agency chief Filippo Grandi said Thursday, ahead of a visit to Syria.

The Syrian civil war, which erupted in 2011 with Assad’s brutal repression of anti-government protests, displaced half of the population internally or abroad.

But Assad’s December 8 ouster at the hands of Islamist forces sparked hopes of return.

“Over two million Syrian refugees and displaced have returned home since December,” Grandi wrote on X during a visit to neighboring Lebanon, which hosts about 1.5 million Syrian refugees, according to official estimates.

It is “a sign of hope amid rising regional tensions,” he said.

“This proves that we need political solutions – not another wave of instability and displacement.”

After 14 years of war, many returnees face the reality of finding their homes and property badly damaged or destroyed.

But with the recent lifting of Western sanctions on Syria, new authorities hope for international support to launch reconstruction, which the UN estimates could cost more than $400 billion.

Earlier this month, UNHCR estimated that up to 1.5 million Syrians from abroad and two million internally displaced persons may return by the end of 2025.


Iran would have ‘no choice but to retaliate’ if US joins Israeli attacks, Iranian deputy foreign minister tells CNN

Iran would have ‘no choice but to retaliate’ if US joins Israeli attacks, Iranian deputy foreign minister tells CNN
Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Iran would have ‘no choice but to retaliate’ if US joins Israeli attacks, Iranian deputy foreign minister tells CNN

Iran would have ‘no choice but to retaliate’ if US joins Israeli attacks, Iranian deputy foreign minister tells CNN
  • Iranian leadership doubts ‘the sincerity of the Americans,’ he adds
  • Diplomat warns Israel’s attack on nuclear sites is a ‘crime’

LONDON: Tehran would have “no choice” but to retaliate if the US decided to join Israel in attacking Iran, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht Ravanchi has told CNN.

Ravanchi told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour: “If the Americans decide to get involved militarily, we have no choice but to retaliate. That is clear and simple because we are acting in self-defense.”

Ravanchi took part in the interview on the sixth day of conflict between his country and Israel. 

Iran had been set to participate in a new round of talks on the nuclear issue with the US last Sunday, until Israel launched its attacks on Friday.

Ravanchi said that his country’s leadership doubted “the sincerity of the Americans” given the timing of Israel’s first attack.

He added: “Two days before the next round (of talks) started, the aggression took place. So, this is a betrayal of diplomacy; this is the betrayal of our trust of Americans.

“We should be the ones who should criticize the way that we were treated by the Americans, not vice versa.”

 

 

The deputy foreign minister said: “The Americans have been collaborating with the Israelis. Although they have said that they do not have anything to do with this conflict, it is not true. But if they decide to be engaged militarily, direct military involvement in this massacre, definitely we will do whatever necessary to protect ourselves.

“They (the Israelis) attacked residential areas, they attacked paramedics, they attacked citizens who were just sleeping in their homes. This is a crime against humanity, pure and simple.”

Israel’s targeting of Iran’s nuclear facilities was also a crime, he said, adding: “Fordow is another protected site based on IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) rules.

“So, that will be another instance of a crime which is being done, unfortunately by Israelis and Americans, which is prohibited under international law.”

He said: “These are safeguarded places. It is a crime in accordance with international law to attack a place which is safeguarded under IAEA rules. Unfortunately, the Americans and some Europeans have shielded the Israeli regime, (and it is) not to be criticized at the IAEA board of governors’ meeting and also at the UN Security Council. So it’s shame on all those who are protecting this regime.”

Ravanchi said that Tehran had not asked the US or Israel to resume nuclear talks since hostilities began, refuting US President Donald Trump’s earlier claim that Tehran had reached out to the White House.

He said: “We are not reaching out to anybody. We are defending ourselves. Although we have always promoted diplomacy … we cannot negotiate under threat. We cannot negotiate while our people are under bombardment every day. So we are not begging for anything; we are just defending ourselves.”

 

 

He claimed that the attacks had mobilized support for the government among Iranians, adding: “Now there is a very strong cohesion within Iranian society to resist aggression, to resist foreign interference in our domestic affairs.

“Ask the people who are in Tehran. You will understand that the Iranians are behind their government because they are facing a foreign aggression which will be resisted.”

Israeli officials have been urging Iranians to rise up against their government, arguing that now is the time for regime change with leaders in Tehran “weakened” by the attacks.

The Israeli strikes came as a result of increased tensions following the release of an IAEA report showing that Tehran had accelerated its uranium enrichment to 60 percent.

Ravanchi said: “IAEA inspectors were present in Iran. Different reports of the IAEA testify to the fact that we have been very straightforward in our nuclear program.

“There is no ban on 60 percent enriched uranium, which is being used in different places for peaceful purposes.”

He reiterated that Iran does not have nuclear weapons and does not intend to create them, adding: “Nuclear weapons have no place in our defensive doctrine. In fact, we believe that the world will be a better place without nuclear weapons.

“But who has the nuclear weapons in the Middle East? The Israeli regime. Who has the weapons, the most sophisticated weapons? The Americans. So, they are the ones who are responsible for all the chaos that is going on in different parts of the world.”


‘Very bad decision’ if Hezbollah joins Iran-Israel war, says US official

‘Very bad decision’ if Hezbollah joins Iran-Israel war, says US official
Updated 43 min 14 sec ago
Follow

‘Very bad decision’ if Hezbollah joins Iran-Israel war, says US official

‘Very bad decision’ if Hezbollah joins Iran-Israel war, says US official
  • US special envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack meets Lebanese officials in Beirut as Iran and Israel trade more strikes
  • Hezbollah has condemned Israel’s strikes on Iran and expressed full solidarity with its leadership

BEIRUT: A top US official visiting the Lebanese capital on Thursday discouraged Tehran-backed armed group Hezbollah from intervening in the war between Iran and Israel, saying it would be a “very bad decision.”

US special envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack, who also serves as ambassador to Turkiye, met Lebanese officials in Beirut as Iran and Israel traded more strikes in their days-long war and as the US continues to press Lebanon to disarm Hezbollah.

After meeting Lebanon’s Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, a close ally of Hezbollah, Barrack was asked what may happen if Hezbollah joined in the regional conflict.

“I can say on behalf of President (Donald) Trump, which he has been very clear in expressing as has Special Envoy (Steve) Witkoff: that would be a very, very, very bad decision,” Barrack told reporters.

Hezbollah has condemned Israel’s strikes on Iran and expressed full solidarity with its leadership. On Thursday, it said threats against Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would have “dire consequences.”

But the group has stopped short of making explicit threats to intervene. After Israel began strikes on Iran last week, a Hezbollah official told Reuters the group would not launch its own attack on Israel in response.

Hezbollah was left badly weakened from last year’s war with Israel, in which the group’s leadership was gutted, thousands of fighters were killed and strongholds in southern Lebanon and near Beirut were severely damaged.

A US-brokered ceasefire deal which ended that war stipulates that the Lebanese government must ensure there are no arms outside state control.

Barrack also met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Thursday and discussed the state’s monopoly on all arms.

Barrack is a private equity executive who has long advised Trump and chaired his inaugural presidential committee in 2016. He was appointed to his role in Turkiye and, in late May, also assumed the position of special envoy to Syria.


Israel strikes Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor, other nuclear sites

Israel strikes Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor, other nuclear sites
Updated 16 min 9 sec ago
Follow

Israel strikes Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor, other nuclear sites

Israel strikes Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor, other nuclear sites
  • Israeli forces also struck nuclear sites in Bushehr, Isfahan and Natanz, and continue to target additional facilities

DUBAI: Israel has attacked Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor, Iranian state television said Thursday.

The report said there was “no radiation danger whatsoever” and that the facility had already been evacuated before the attack.

Israel had warned earlier it would attack the facility and urged the public to flee the area. The warning came in a social media post on X. It included a satellite image of the plant in a red circle like other warnings that preceded strikes.

The Israeli military said Thursday’s round of airstrikes targeted Tehran and other areas of Iran, without elaborating. It later said Iran fired a new salvo of missiles at Israel and told the public to take shelter.

A military spokesperson later said Israeli forces struck nuclear sites in Bushehr, Isfahan and Natanz, and continue to target additional facilities. Bushehr is Iran’s only operating nuclear power plant, which sits on the Gulf coast.

An Israeli military official said on Thursday that “it was a mistake” for a military spokesperson to have said earlier in the day that Israel had struck the Bushehr nuclear site in Iran.

The official would only confirm that Israel had hit the Natanz, Isfahan and Arak nuclear sites in Iran.

Pressed further on Bushehr, the official said he could neither confirm or deny that Israel had struck the location, where Iran has a reactor.

Hitting Bushehr, which is close to Gulf Arab neighbors and staffed in part by Russian experts, would have been a major escalation.

Israel’s seventh day of airstrikes on Iran came a day after Iran’s supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause “irreparable damage to them.” Israel also lifted some restrictions on daily life, suggesting the missile threat from Iran on its territory was easing.

Already, Israel’s campaign has targeted Iran’s enrichment site at Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran and a nuclear site in Isfahan. Its strikes have also killed top generals and nuclear scientists.

A Washington-based Iranian human rights group said at least 639 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 1,300 wounded. In retaliation, Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones, killing at least 24 people in Israel and wounding hundreds. Some have hit apartment buildings in central Israel, causing heavy damage.

The Arak heavy water reactor is 250 kilometers southwest of Tehran.

Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. That would provide Iran another path to the bomb beyond enriched uranium, should it choose to pursue the weapon.

Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns.

In 2019, Iran started up the heavy water reactor’s secondary circuit, which at the time did not violate Tehran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.

Britain at the time was helping Iran redesign the Arak reactor to limit the amount of plutonium it produces, stepping in for the US, which had withdrawn from the project after President Donald Trump’s decision in 2018 to unilaterally withdraw America from the nuclear deal.

The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, has been urging Israel not to strike Iranian nuclear sites. IAEA inspectors reportedly last visited Arak on May 14.

Due to restrictions Iran imposed on inspectors, the IAEA has said it lost “continuity of knowledge” about Iran’s heavy water production — meaning it could not absolutely verify Tehran’s production and stockpile.

As part of negotiations around the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to sell off its heavy water to the West to remain in compliance with the accord’s terms. Even the US purchased some 32 tons of heavy water for over $8 million in one deal. That was one issue that drew criticism from opponents to the deal.


Iran confirms meeting European officials on Friday, Iran state media says

Iran confirms meeting European officials on Friday, Iran state media says
Updated 19 June 2025
Follow

Iran confirms meeting European officials on Friday, Iran state media says

Iran confirms meeting European officials on Friday, Iran state media says

DUBAI: Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi confirmed on Thursday he would meet his British, French and German counterparts as well as the European Union’s top diplomat on Friday in Geneva, Iranian state media reported.
He said the meeting had come at the request of the three European states.