UN Security Council condemns RSF assault on El-Fasher amid warnings of ‘blood on the sand’ in Sudan

Special UN Security Council condemns RSF assault on El-Fasher amid warnings of ‘blood on the sand’ in Sudan
Sudanese who fled El-Fasher after Sudan’s paramilitary forces killed hundreds of people there, gather at their camp in Tawila, Sudan, Thursday, Oct. 30, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

UN Security Council condemns RSF assault on El-Fasher amid warnings of ‘blood on the sand’ in Sudan

UN Security Council condemns RSF assault on El-Fasher amid warnings of ‘blood on the sand’ in Sudan
  • Top officials voice anger at ‘horrifying situation’ in the besieged city with ‘risk of mass atrocities alarmingly high’
  • ‘World has failed an entire generation of Sudanese children,’ says humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher

NEW YORK: The UN Security Council on Thursday expressed grave concern over what it described as a horrifying assault by Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces on the besieged city of El-Fasher, North Darfur, warning that atrocities against civilians risk spiraling into large-scale, ethnically motivated killings.

In a statement adopted by consensus, council members condemned the RSF attack and its “devastating impact on the civilian population,” recalling Resolution 2736 from 2024 which demands that the RSF lift its siege of the city and halt hostilities.

The council urged all sides to “protect civilians and abide by their obligations under international humanitarian law,” while stressing the need for “safe passage for those trying to flee the city.”

The statement called on all parties to “allow and facilitate safe and unhindered humanitarian access,” and reaffirmed the council’s opposition to any “parallel governing authority” in areas under RSF control. It also urged states to refrain from “external interference which seeks to foment conflict and instability.”

The Security Council’s message came as top UN officials described a catastrophic situation on the ground.

UN Humanitarian Chief Tom Fletcher told the council that after more than a year of siege, El-Fasher has “descended into an even darker hell.”

“Can anyone here say we did not know this was coming?” Fletcher asked, describing reports of mass executions, rapes, and mutilations by RSF fighters.

“We cannot hear the screams, but as we sit here today, the horror is continuing.”

He cited reports that nearly 500 people, including patients and their companions, were killed this week at the Saudi Maternity Hospital in the city, calling it “yet another example of the depravity with which this war has been fought.”

“Those who want to leave El-Fasher must be able to do so safely. Those who remain must be protected,” Fletcher said.

“There must be accountability for those carrying out the killing and the sexual violence. For those giving the orders. And those providing the weapons should consider their responsibility.”

He said the UN had been repeatedly blocked by the RSF from delivering food and medicine, even as “tens of thousands of terrified, starving civilians” fled on foot toward Tawila, itself overwhelmed with displaced people.

“This is not just a crisis of violence — it is a crisis of hunger,” he said.

“Famine is confirmed, and severe food insecurity is spreading. Blood on the sand. And Mr. President, blood on the hands.”

Fletcher condemned the expulsion of World Food Programme officials by Sudanese authorities, and warned that “humanitarians simply asking that we be allowed to do our jobs and save lives is not working.”

Assistant Secretary-General Martha Ama Akyaa Pobee told the council that El-Fasher had fallen to the RSF after more than 500 days under siege, with only “small pockets of resistance” remaining.

“The situation is simply horrifying,” Pobee said. “In the past week, the UN Human Rights Office has documented widespread and serious violations, including mass killings and summary executions during house-to-house searches and as civilians tried to flee.”

She said communications with the city had been severed, making it difficult to assess the full scale of casualties. “Despite commitments to protect civilians, the reality is that no one is safe in El-Fasher. There is no safe passage for civilians to leave the city.”

Pobee also cited reports of atrocities in North Kordofan, including the killing of 50 civilians and five Red Crescent volunteers in Bara after the RSF captured the town. “These acts are often ethnically motivated reprisals,” she said.

The UN political chief warned that the conflict’s territorial scope is widening, with drone strikes and fighting spreading across Kordofan, Blue Nile, Sennar, and Khartoum. “The risk of mass atrocities remains alarmingly high,” she said.

Pobee reiterated the secretary-general’s call for an immediate ceasefire and cautioned against foreign meddling.

“External support is enabling the conflict. Weapons and fighters continue to flow into Sudan,” she said, urging states with influence over the warring parties to press for de-escalation.

Fletcher ended his address with a stark warning about the world’s moral failure to stop atrocities reminiscent of Darfur’s darkest days.

“What is unfolding in El-Fasher recalls the horrors Darfur was subjected to 20 years ago,” he said. “But somehow today we are seeing a very different global reaction — one of indifference, resignation, a shrugging of shoulders.”

He addressed the council: “Where is our diplomacy? Where are our values? Where is our conscience?

“The world has failed an entire generation of Sudan’s children,” Fletcher said. “If this council does not act now, it will own that failure.”


Iraq can disarm factions only when the US withdraws, prime minister says 

Iraq can disarm factions only when the US withdraws, prime minister says 
Updated 04 November 2025
Follow

Iraq can disarm factions only when the US withdraws, prime minister says 

Iraq can disarm factions only when the US withdraws, prime minister says 
  • Sudani highlights US investment in Iraq’s energy sector
  • Sudani confident in election victory, aims for second term

BAGHDAD: Iraq has pledged to bring all weapons under the control of the state, but that will not work so long as there is a US-led coalition in the country that some Iraqi factions view as an occupying force, the prime minister said on Monday.
Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani said a plan was still in place to have the multinational anti-Daesh coalition completely leave Iraq, one of Iran’s closest Arab allies, by September 2026 because the threat from Islamist militant groups had eased considerably.
“There is no Daesh. Security and stability? Thank God it’s there ... so give me the excuse for the presence of 86 states (in a coalition),” he said in an interview in Baghdad, referring to the number of countries that have participated in the coalition since it was formed in 2014.
“Then, for sure there will be a clear program to end any arms outside of state institutions. This is the demand of all,” he said, noting factions could enter official security forces or get into politics by laying down their arms.
‘No side can pull Iraq to war’, says Sudani
Iraq is navigating a politically sensitive effort to disarm Iran-backed militias amid pressure from the US, which has said it would like Sudani to dismantle armed groups affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces, an umbrella group of mostly Shiite factions. The PMF was formally integrated into Iraq’s state forces and includes several groups aligned with Iran.
At the same time, the US and Iraq have agreed on a phased withdrawal of American troops, with a full exit expected by the end of 2026. An initial drawdown began in 2025.
Asked about growing international pressure on non-state armed groups in the region such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah, part of Iran’s so-called Axis of Resistance created to counter US and Israeli influence in the Middle East, Sudani said:
“There is time enough, God willing. The situation here is different than Lebanon.”
“Iraq is clear in its stances to maintain security and stability and that state institutions have the decision over war and peace, and that no side can pull Iraq to war or conflict,” said Sudani.
Shiite power Iran has gained vast influence in Iraq since a US-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003, with heavily armed pro-Iranian paramilitary groups wielding enormous political and military power.
Successive Iraqi governments have faced the challenge of keeping both arch-foes Iran and the US as allies. While the US slaps sanctions on Iran, Iraq does business with it.
Securing major US investment is a top priority for Iraq, which has faced severe economic problems and years of sectarian bloodletting since 2003.
Us companies increasingly active in Iraq, says Sudani
“There is a clear, intensive and qualitative entrance of US companies into Iraq,” said Sudani, including the biggest ever agreement with GE for 24,000 MW of power, equivalent to the country’s entire current generation capacity, he said.
In August, Iraq signed an agreement in principle with US oil producer Chevron (CVX.N), for a project at Nassiriya in southern Iraq that consists of four exploration blocks in addition to the development of other producing oil fields.
Sudani said an agreement with US LNG firm Excelerate to provide LNG helped Iraq cope with rolling power cuts.
Sudani praised a recent preliminary agreement signed with ExxonMobil, and he said the advantage of this agreement is that for the first time Iraq is agreeing with a global company to develop oilfields along with an export system.
Sudani said that US and European companies had shown interest in a plan for the building of a fixed platform for importing and exporting gas off the coast of the Grand Faw Port, which would be the first project there.
Sudani said the government had set a deadline for the end of 2027 to stop all burning of gas and to reach self-sufficiency in gas supplies, and to stop gas imports from Iran.
“We burn gas worth four to five billion (dollars) per year and import gas with 4 billion dollars per year. These are wrong policies and it’s our government that has been finding solutions to these issues,” he said.
Sudani is running against established political parties in his ruling coalition in Iraq’s November 11 election and said he expects to win. Many analysts regard him as the frontrunner.
“We expect a significant victory,” he said, adding he wanted a second term. “We want to keep going on this path.”
Sudani said he believed this year’s elections would see a higher turnout than last year’s roughly 40 percent in parliamentary polls, which was down from around 80 percent two decades ago.
Sudani campaigns as Iraq’s builder-in-chief
He has portrayed himself as the builder-in-chief, his campaign posters strategically laid out at key sites of Baghdad construction, including a new dual-carriageway along the Tigris in the center of the capital.
He ticks off the number of incomplete projects he inherited from previous governments – 2,582, he said — and notes he spent a fraction of their initial cost to finish them.
Many Iraqis have been positive about the roads, bridges and buildings they have seen go up, helping to somewhat alleviate the choking traffic in the city.
But it has come at a cost.
Sudani’s three-year budget was the largest in Iraq’s history at over $150 billion a year.
He also hired about 1 million employees into the already-bloated state bureaucracy, buying social stability at the cost of severely limiting the government’s fiscal room for maneuver.
“I am not worried about Iraq’s financial and economic situation. Iraq is a rich country with many resources, but my fear is that the implementation of reforms is delayed,” he said.