For obvious reasons, talk about reforms continues to dominate discussion panels. It has become a pressing issue with ideas and suggestions coming from all directions. What is most important here is not defining the origin of the ideas or who is behind them as much as finding the proper channels through which these ideas can pass in order to determine the final shape that we want the dialogue to take.

There are some who believe that reform is facing real obstacles. It is an assumption not far from reality and must therefore be given due consideration; a large part of the discussion must focus on first identifying and then addressing the obstacles.

The existence of obstacles is substantiated by the fact that at present, a general feeling of disappointment prevails as a result of the foot-dragging policy of many influential institutions — both government and private — and their failure to address the core issues.

Let us begin by first identifying what is really meant by reform in the first place and where it should lead us. We should ask ourselves if reform is part of a natural process of development that influences everything in life or rather a comprehensive, systematic and radical process of change applicable to existing systems and laws.

These are two completely different matters. Whereas delay in the first is expected, in the second case more effort and hard work is required if the adverse effects resulting from delay are to be addressed. We are thus required to admit that a state of ambiguity and uncertainty continues to surround reform, and this in turn calls for working to dissipate any fears by clearly defining the objectives of reform and creating a suitable climate for dealing with it as a fact that cannot, and should not, be ignored.

Another obstacle facing reform is that some people seek by different means to influence decisions relating to reform. They have decisions made only through bureaucratic channels, thus throwing the entire process into confusion. The imbalance between the desire to see reform materialize and influence the decision-making process, coupled with a passive media that seeks neutrality constitutes yet another obstacle. If things continue this way, our ability to move fast to achieve our goals will be seriously diminished. Are we really capable of striking a balance under the existing circumstances?

— Arab News Local Press 14 October 2003