MANILA, 9 May 2004 — Filipinos reaped praise worldwide for using peaceful “people power” to oust dictator Ferdinand Marcos and restore democracy in 1986. But 15 years later, they were criticized for using the same tactics to force out President Joseph Estrada midway through the six-year term he won with the widest margin in Philippine history.
Filipinos head to the polls again tomorrow in a race seen as so close that millions of voters will likely be dissatisfied with the outcome. Some wonder whether the nation can accept the results without another “people power” revolt.
The hope is that Filipinos are now politically mature enough to accept the result and let the democratic institutions and legal system resolve any conflicts.
“For me, after the second one — that’s enough,” said taxi driver Daniel Original, who was only 7 when Marcos was toppled. “If we have another one, it won’t look good anymore.”
Even though Estrada’s ouster was legitimized by a Supreme Court ruling, critics say his fate should have been determined by an impeachment trial that stalled after opposition prosecutors walked out in a protest over the pro-Estrada Senate majority blocking crucial evidence.
Conditions in the Philippines do not inspire confidence that it will remain free of upheavals.Shortly after Estrada exited through the back door, there was a foiled bid by tens of thousands of his supporters to storm the presidential palace to oust his successor, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. A group of disgruntled military men staged a brief, failed mutiny last July.
Just days ahead of tomorrow’s polling, the national security adviser claimed that opposition figures are already plotting to stir up trouble if they lose.
If Estrada had stayed in office, the election would have chosen his successor. Instead, it pits Arroyo against Fernando Poe Jr., an action film star and close friend of Estrada, with three other candidates given scant chance of success.
Political commentator Benito Lim, a former Asian studies professor, traces the roots of mass protests to a failure by the nation’s elite to solve the gripping social ills of poverty, corruption, an underdeveloped economy, sharply unequal distribution of wealth and lack of opportunities.
After decades of control by an ineffective upper class, Filipino “people power” emerged as a “tribal gathering to oust a person they hate,” Lim said.
“It has never been a genuine revolution of a common desire to institute common programs addressing issues and problems of the republic,” Lim told Associated Press Television News.
Arroyo’s political adviser, Joey Rufino, said the first “people power” revolt — called the “EDSA revolution” or “EDSA 1” after the Manila highway where it took place — was staged against dictatorship. The second, dubbed “EDSA 2,” took aim at “corruption and bad governance,” Rufino said.
The 1986 revolt revived a political system — modeled after that of former colonial power the United States — that prevailed before Marcos imposed martial law in 1972 and started his one-man rule. People took to the streets about two weeks after Marcos purportedly stole an election from opposition candidate Corazon Aquino, and she was swept to power.
“It restored some elite groups in society. But, on the whole, I give credit to the people, for without the people, it would not have happened,” Rufino said.
Filipinos remember Rufino, now executive director of the ruling Lakas-CMD party, as the man caught by television cameras tearfully pleading with soldiers — who had been sent by Marcos to quash the uprising — to instead join the revolt.
Rufino said he’s now “too old” for street protests and he hopes the “EDSA 2” movement will be the last.
“We can’t keep on going to the streets every time we hate something in government. That would be mob rule or anarchy,” he told The Associated Press. “Otherwise this will be a never-ending cycle ... worse than a banana republic.”
His fear: “One day, everybody will just wish there was a leader that is a strongman. And, then everybody will lose their rights. Everybody will lose their freedoms because they abused them.”
Teddy Casino, a member of the left-wing Bayan Muna party, said more time — plus electoral and political reforms — are needed so a majority of the people can enjoy democracy.
Casino said tomorrow’s elections will mark the first time that leftist groups “of all shades and sizes are getting involved” as alternatives to traditional politicians, who are derisively referred to by the masses as “trapo,” a Filipino word for rag.
“We can consider this is a test case with respect to the left’s entry into the mainstream,” he said.
