What I find truly remarkable in Rosa Parks’ now legendary defiance is the simple forthrightness of her actions.

Her death, at the age of 92 should be more than a sober reminder of the legacy of a legendary Civil Rights pioneer. Rather it should be the reminder of an often forgotten lesson that meaningful change can be achieved if there are those willing to fight for it.

Much of what has been written about Parks’ passing and burial in the US Capitol Rotunda on Oct. 30 missed the key to what made Parks so special: Her ordinariness.

Rev. Jesse Jackson was most agitated by those who referred to Parks as a seamstress, insisting that she was “an activist in the (civil rights) movement”.

While some described her with such revering words elevating her to a saint, others tried to exploit her legacy for personal gains, especially those with plummeting reputations. One such was US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. “I think I can say that without Mrs. Parks, I would not be standing here today as secretary of state,” she reportedly said.

Rice — whose prime role in promoting the Bush administration’s unwarranted and often violent foreign policy and wars — can never fathom the disservice made to Parks’ legacy with that objectionable assertion.

Neither her membership in the African-American community nor the fact that she was born in Alabama — as we were reminded time and again by the uncritical media — should have been a good enough reason for Rice to make use of Parks’ legacy to reinvent her own.

But of course Rice was expected to utter the words she did, as much as President George W. Bush — with faltering ratings — was expected to place wreaths of carnations upon Parks’ casket.

The many solemn comments made by US government officials, media pundits and every word printed in major mainstream newspapers were similarly predictable. They all praised Rosa Parks because they were expected to do so, not because the rebellious spirit of the Montgomery seamstress meant much to them or represented anything.

To the contrary, the meaning of Parks’ legacy, her simple act of defiance stands at odds with everything for which the Bush administration stands.

Since Parks’ refusal to move to the back of the bus on Dec. 1, 1955, to make room for a white passenger, millions of Americans have followed in Parks’ footsteps. Her defiant statement — “I am tired of being treated like a second class citizen” — has been endorsed by millions of Americans of all colors and backgrounds, who became tired of being treated like second class citizens, tired of having their government treat other nations like second class citizens, tired of wars, arms races and tired of being lied to, over and over again.

Reducing Parks’ legacy to that of a precise time in history, place, political line or skin color is also a betrayal of that legacy. What Parks objected to was injustice; what she unwaveringly demanded was equality. Neither concept has been adequately addressed or resolved.

But it was no coincidence that Parks’ legacy was reduced and stripped of its broad denotation. If an honest and perceptive analysis were offered, then many other names, of audacious, rebellious yet ordinary individuals — whose fight for justice and equality is as real and meaningful as Parks’ — would have to be equally saluted.

While US foreign policy as exemplified in the Iraq war has brought out the worst in American politics, politicians and the military apparatus, it has also brought out the best in Americans: The tireless activists, the human rights advocates, the justice and peace campaigners. They represent important, though often neglected segments of American society. They can be found in churches, in universities and on street corners.

Rosa Parks is gone, but her country has plenty of great women and men who will continue to contribute to the ongoing struggle for justice and rights the world over. One is Kathy Kelly, who emerged from a lonely voice in the wilderness to the leader of a movement that helped save thousands of Iraqi lives; another is Cindy Sheehan, whose fight to bring US troops home is one of great honor and courage. There is former US Ambassador Joseph Wilson who dared question the Bush administration’s case for war and whose efforts are causing quite a stir in Washington; a forth is tireless former Congressman Paul Findley, who “dared to speak out” against the iniquitous role played by the Israeli lobby on Capital Hill; and finally there is Congressman Jim McDermott who continues to defy conformity and challenge the senselessness of the Bush clique. These are but a few individuals in a nation that is able and willing to reclaim its rightful standing as a world leader rather than rogue state. There are millions more who are resolute in returning America back to the path once walked by great Civil Rights champions, some so great in their ordinariness, in their persistence, and in their defiance.

— Ramzy Baroud teaches mass communication at Australia’s Curtin University of Technology, Malaysia Campus. He is also the editor in chief of PalestineChronicle.com