- COLOMBO: Sri Lanka has scrapped visa on arrival for all nationals except those from the Maldives and Singapore, an official said Friday, in a move which could damage the country's revived tourist industry.
"The existing visa regime of granting landing endorsements on arrival for tourists will be withdrawn with effect from Sept. 30, 2010," said Controller General of Immigration W.A.C. Perera.
Perera said that visitors from Singapore and the Maldives, which grant Sri Lankan passport holders visa on arrival, would be exempted.
Sri Lanka has granted foreign tourists a 30-day visa on arrival since the 1970s as part of a move to promote tourism, which was badly affected by the island's 37-year ethnic conflict.
The local tourism industry has been buoyed by a near 50 percent increase in foreign visitors since fighting ended in May last year.
Sri Lanka hopes to double the number of visiting tourists this year to 600,000.
Meanwhile, Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Friday secured the two-thirds parliamentary majority he needs to change the constitution after an opposition party with eight legislators pledged its support.
"We will not join the government, but we will support the proposed constitutional amendments," Basheer Segu Dawood, the chairman of the ethnic minority party Sri Lanka Muslim Congress, said.
The president's United Peoples Freedom Alliance won a sweeping majority in an April parliamentary poll after Rajapaksa's re-election to the presidency three months earlier.
Rajapaksa has already struck a tentative deal to return Sri Lanka to rule by an executive prime minister. That would allow him to by-pass the existing two-term limit as head of state and run the country as prime minister.
With the latest support, Rajapaksa's ruling United People Freedom Alliance (UPFA) can command 154 votes in the 225-seat Parliament, giving the president more than the two-thirds majority required for a constitutional change.
The crossovers come as the government and the main opposition United National Party are in discussions to change the constitution and reduce the president's executive powers.
Critics blame the president's strong executive powers under the present constitution for political interference in the judiciary, public service and police, allowing the head of state to manipulate the system as he or she wishes.



