BAGHDAD/ANKARA, 2 March 2003 — Iraq started destroying its banned Al-Samoud 2 missiles yesterday under the gaze of UN inspectors, complicating an American push to win international support to go to war against Baghdad for failing to disarm.
US preparations for war suffered a further setback — possibly temporary — when Turkey’s Parliament first passed but then rejected a long-awaited motion allowing the deployment of 62,000 US troops in Turkey for a possible invasion of Iraq.
Four missiles with a range exceeding the 150-km (93-mile) limit set in UN resolutions were crushed under the supervision of UN inspectors yesterday. “I can confirm now that four Al-Samoud missiles have been destroyed,” a UN spokesman told Reuters.
Iraq is thought to have produced around 100 Al-Samoud 2 missiles, deploying about 50 in military bases around Baghdad.
Iraqi compliance had been seen as crucial before Blix addresses the Security Council late next week — after which the United States and Britain want to bring to a vote a draft resolution that lays the ground for war. The move to start scrapping Iraq’s most advanced surface-to-surface missiles was hailed as a “significant piece of real disarmament” by chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix, but was dismissed by Washington as part of a “game of deception”.
In Ankara, the parliamentary resolution, which would also have cleared the way for Turkey to send its troops to Iraq in any war, was narrowly rejected after hours of debate on an issue which has generated widespread opposition in Turkey. The motion, approved by a simple majority but not the overall majority of MPs present, would have enabled the United States to station troops in Turkey to establish a “northern front” which experts say would shorten any war.
Ankara fears the economic and political impact of any war in Iraq, but now risks losing massive US financial aid and any say in the future of northern Iraq, where it has key interests. The government may try to put a similar motion to the assembly again and gather the few extra votes it needs.
The mood in the Middle East at street level was also strongly against US action.
In one of the biggest anti-war protests in the Middle East, more than 300,000 Yemenis took to the streets denouncing the United States, its main ally Britain and Israel as an “axis of evil” and urging Arab leaders to deny Washington help in a war.
In Turkey around 20,000 protesters took to the streets of Ankara urging Parliament to reject Washington’s request to use the country as a launchpad for an attack.
The Vatican, which does not believe an attack on Iraq could be considered a “just war”, said Pope John Paul would send a senior cardinal to Washington in the next few days on a personal peace mission.
Hiro Ueki, the spokesman for the UN inspectors, said the destruction of the proscribed Al-Samoud 2 missiles, components and related systems was taking place at the Taji military base, some 40 km (25 miles) north of Baghdad.
Uday Al-Taei, a senior official of the Iraqi Information Ministry, said “a timetable and action plan” had been agreed for the coming days. Iraq’s promise to destroy one of its major weapons systems did little to heal divisions in the UN Security Council, with the United States and Britain saying it meant little and Russia welcoming the decision.
The United States says the missiles represent the tip of the iceberg and that Baghdad is trying to mask the fact that it has huge stores of the weapons of mass destruction that it is required to scrap by numerous UN resolutions.
“(UN) Resolution 1441 called for a complete, total and immediate disarmament. It did not call for pieces of disarmament. The president has always predicted that Iraq would destroy its Al-Samoud missiles as part of their game of deception,” said White House spokeswoman Mercy Viana.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw echoed Washington’s sentiment, saying: “What Saddam Hussein does...is he plays the international community, trying to divide and trying to trickle out concessions.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko applauded the Iraqi move. “We see this as highly important evidence of Iraq’s cooperation with the United Nations,” he told Interfax news agency.
In a pre-recorded weekly radio address, US President George W. Bush again threatened military action while promising a brighter future for the Iraqi people once Saddam is gone.
“The United States has no intention of determining the precise form of Iraq’s new government. That choice belongs to the Iraqi people. Yet we will ensure that one brutal dictator is not replaced by another,” Bush said.
