Philippines’ Marcos features among Time’s 100 most influential people

Philippines’ Marcos features among Time’s 100 most influential people
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. talks with the audience following his address to the Lowy Institute in Melbourne, Australia, March 4, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 18 April 2024
Follow

Philippines’ Marcos features among Time’s 100 most influential people

Philippines’ Marcos features among Time’s 100 most influential people
  • Other Filipinos previously featured are Rodrigo Duterte, Leila de Lima, Maria Ressa
  • Magazine recognizes Marcos’ attempts to rehabilitate the name of his dictator father and namesake

MANILA: Time magazine has featured Philippine President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. in its list of the 100 most influential people of 2024, which includes other heads of state, celebrities, scientists and tycoons.

First published in 1999, the annual list recognizes people from various fields for making an impact, breaking records or rules. Entrants are featured for making change — regardless of the consequences of their actions.

Marcos, 66, the son and namesake of the late Philippine dictator, won a landslide victory in the 2022 elections. He campaigned on the issue of national unity and portrayed himself as the candidate for change, promising happiness to 110 million Filipinos, weary of pandemic hardships and years of political polarization under his immediate predecessor Rodrigo Duterte.

The magazine recognized his efforts to rehabilitate and “whitewash” the name of his father and also highlighted his other achievements in office.

“He brought technocrats back into government, steadied the post-pandemic economy, and elevated the Philippines on the world stage,” Time’s news correspondent Charlie Campbell wrote.

“Many problems persist, including extrajudicial killings and journalists routinely attacked. But by trying to repair his family name, Bongbong may reshape his country too.”

The article also recognized Marcos for standing against Beijing’s claims in the disputed South China Sea, where Chinese ships have been regularly entering the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.

Standing steadfast against Chinese aggression has also gained him praise at home.

“His policy on the West Philippine Sea of standing up against China is good,” said Raymond Zabala, a lawyer, who was “optimistic and skeptical at the same time” about Marcos’ inclusion in Time’s list, owing to unanswered issues about his family’s ill-gotten wealth and abuses during his father’s rule.

“Given his family’s background and some of the issues during the election campaign, I can’t help but feel critical.”

While appearing on Time’s list is often seen as an honor, Filipinos said they did not see how their country was improving its reputation, although they were observing fewer human rights violations compared with the previous Duterte administration and its “war on drugs,” which according to rights groups has led to the deaths of over 12,000 people.

“The Philippines will be reverting back to its usual image of a corrupt nation, probably minus the extrajudicial killings,” said Crystal Arcega, a law student.

Writer Pam Musni told Arab News she felt the perception of Marcos’ administration was the same as that of his predecessor’s, although “probably less bloodthirsty” and “more emboldened” against China.

“I understand why he was included in the list, with ‘influential’ not necessarily being a good or bad thing,” she said.

“It is especially frustrating that he does not make any significant strides towards the threat of climate change, and that he has expressed support for Israel, a country that has been killing many innocent lives in Palestine.”

A recent Pulse Asia survey showed Marcos’ performance ratings fell from 68 percent in December 2023 to 55 percent in March.

“I’m still waiting to hear how he plans to assert our sovereignty, since that is always a balancing act with the US,” said sustainable development practitioner J.K. Asturias.

Initially enthusiastic about Marcos’ $160 billion infrastructure plans under his Build Better More program, he has been increasingly critical over lack of support for alternative modes of transportation.

“In recent times I’ve been especially disappointed with how they are banning light electric vehicles even though there is a law that says the government should be incentivizing their adoption. I also feel he does a lot of greenwashing, pretending he’s pro-environment even though he pushes for mining,” Asturias said.

For him, the impression that Time’s list would create was one of the Filipinos’ tendency to forget.

“Many people will most likely see the Philippines as a nation that forgets too soon and forgives too much,” he said. “If they don’t think that already.”

Other Filipinos featured by Time have included Duterte and his vocal critic and former senator Leila de Lima in 2017.

Journalist Maria Ressa was recognized by Time in 2019 — two years before becoming a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

The late former President Corazon Aquino, a central figure in the ousting of Marcos’ father in the bloodless 1986 People Power Revolution, was Time’s Woman of the Year in 1987.


Afghanistan’s Taliban government bans ‘violent’ mixed martial arts

Afghanistan’s Taliban government bans ‘violent’ mixed martial arts
Updated 58 min 17 sec ago
Follow

Afghanistan’s Taliban government bans ‘violent’ mixed martial arts

Afghanistan’s Taliban government bans ‘violent’ mixed martial arts
  • The order was passed down by Afghanistan’s morality police after an investigation into the sport’s compliance with Islamic law

KABUL: Afghanistan’s Taliban government has banned mixed martial arts (MMA), believing it to be un-Islamic, its sports authority said in a statement on Wednesday.
The order was passed down by Afghanistan’s morality police in the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice after an investigation into the sport’s compliance with Islamic law, or sharia, the statement and local media said.
“It was found that the sport is problematic with respect to sharia and it has many aspects which are contradictory to the teachings of Islam,” the Taliban government sports authority said in a statement.
“That’s why this decision has been made to ban mixed martial arts in Afghanistan.”
A sports authority official told local media MMA was banned in part because it was considered too violent and posed the risk of injury or death.
The Taliban authorities returned to power in 2021, implementing a strict interpretation of Islamic law.
They recently ratified a morality law formalising many rules on behavior and dress, including that men must not wear shorts above the knee.
Martial arts are popular sports in Afghanistan.
Four of the 11 Afghans who competed at the Paris Games, on either the national or the Refugee Olympic teams, were martial arts athletes.
MMA has not been recognized as an Olympic sport, in part due to safety concerns.


Saudi tourism launches travel roadshow in Malaysia

Saudi tourism launches travel roadshow in Malaysia
Updated 11 min 56 sec ago
Follow

Saudi tourism launches travel roadshow in Malaysia

Saudi tourism launches travel roadshow in Malaysia
  • 5-day event spotlights Kingdom’s main heritage and cultural sites
  • Tens of thousands of Malaysians visit Saudi Arabia every year for Hajj and Umrah

PUTRAJAYA: The Saudi Tourism Authority launched a travel roadshow in Malaysia on Wednesday, inviting visitors to explore the Kingdom’s top heritage destinations and thriving sports and entertainment scene.

The Saudi tourism sector has been thriving under Vision 2030, as the Kingdom positions itself as a dynamic, diverse, year-round tourism destination and market that will contribute 10 percent to gross domestic product by 2030.

The STA’s event, which will run through Sunday, is being held at the IOI Mall in Putrajaya, Malaysia’s administrative capital, where more than a dozen cubicles and booths present different tourist and cultural attractions.

“We are here to send a message to all the Malaysian people ... to welcome them to come to Saudi (Arabia),” Alhasan Aldabbagh, STA president for Asia-Pacific markets, said during the exhibition’s launch.

Touting the Kingdom as one of the fastest-growing tourism destinations, he said that Malaysia was one of the countries whose citizens could easily apply for an electronic visa to enter Saudi Arabia.

“Malaysians can go online by themselves and get the e-visa within minutes,” he said.

Alhasan Aldabbagh, STA president for Asia-Pacific markets, speaks to Malaysian reporters in Putrajaya on Aug. 28, 2024. (AN Photo)

Tourists from Southeast Asia have made a beeline for the Kingdom, with more than 1.5 million people from across the region visiting Saudi Arabia every year.

Tens of thousands of visitors from Malaysia travel to the Kingdom every year to perform the Hajj and Umrah pilgrimage.

Many curious Malaysians who stopped by the exhibition were greeted with dates and gahwa, the traditional Arabic coffee. They were invited to also explore the Kingdom’s heritage sites and numerous sports and entertainment events.

“There is a lot that Saudi is offering today. Saudi is very rich in culture and heritage,” Aldabbagh said, adding that there were a lot of attractions to go with Riyadh Season — a series of entertainment, cultural and sporting events that run in the Saudi capital throughout the winter months, starting in October.

“In March 2025, we will also host Formula One.”

The Malaysia roadshow follows similar events held by the STA in other Asian countries over the past few years.

In May, it launched its first show exhibition in Indonesia, and in June signed an agreement with a leading Saudi investment company to develop an integrated residential ecosystem with accommodation offerings tailored to visitors from China.

Since early 2023, the STA has also intensified promotional activity in India, which is expected to become the Kingdom’s top tourism source market by 2030.


Thailand has suffered ‘judicial coup’: opposition leader

Thailand has suffered ‘judicial coup’: opposition leader
Updated 28 August 2024
Follow

Thailand has suffered ‘judicial coup’: opposition leader

Thailand has suffered ‘judicial coup’: opposition leader
  • The Constitutional Court disbanded the progressive Move Forward Party and banned its leaders from politics
  • It also threw then-premier Srettha Thavisin out of office for ethics violations

BANGKOK: Thailand’s main opposition leader on Wednesday accused judges of mounting a “judicial coup,” after court rulings that ousted the kingdom’s prime minister and dissolved its most popular party.
The Constitutional Court earlier this month disbanded the progressive Move Forward Party (MFP) and banned its leaders from politics, before throwing then-premier Srettha Thavisin out of office for ethics violations.
MFP, which won most seats in last year’s election, swiftly relaunched as the People’s Party (PP), and its new leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut said that reform was needed for the kingdom to progress.
“The Constitutional Court has ousted the PM, and also ousted the ex-executives of MFP — we call it a judicial coup,” he said in an interview at the Thai parliament.
“A power that is not accountable to the people overruled the executive branch and legislative branch which are elected by the people. This is a sign that Thailand is not a full democracy,” he added.
Natthaphong, a 37-year-old tech entrepreneur, said his party will push for reforms to limit the Constitutional Court’s powers to vet legislation — removing its ability to dissolve political parties or sack prime ministers.
Thailand’s politics over the past two decades has been scarred by a bitter struggle between populist progressive parties and the kingdom’s pro-military, pro-royalist elite.
MFP’s popular leader Pita Limjaroenrat led the party to a surprise first place in last year’s election promising to reform Thailand’s tough lese-majeste laws, reduce military influence and tackle powerful business monopolies.
But he was blocked from forming a government by senators appointed by the last military junta, ostensibly because of concerns about the party’s plans for the royal insult laws.
A court later ruled that the proposals amounted to an attempt to overthrow the constitutional monarchy, and on August 7, MFP became the latest in a series of Thai political parties to be dissolved by judges.
The European Union, United States, United Nations and human rights groups blasted the court’s dissolution of MFP, with the EU saying it harmed democratic openness in Thailand.
Natthaphong urged the international community not to stint in its criticism when Thailand breached democratic norms, saying the kingdom “deserves to know when it’s doing wrong.”
Natthaphong said the new party would talk to conservative groups and courts to try to convince them about its plans for reform.
But he insisted PP would not back down on the substance, even on the sensitive subject of royal defamation laws — known in Thailand as 112 from the relevant section of the criminal code.
“The only thing we are going to change is the methodology or the approach,” he said.
“We are not going to change the principle. The principle is... to accept that the 112 law has a problem.”
Thailand has some of the world’s strictest lese-majeste laws shielding King Maha Vajiralongkorn from criticism, and human rights groups say they have been abused in recent years to stifle legitimate debate.
PP is targeting a clear majority in the next general election, due in mid-2027, but there are inevitably fears that the party will suffer more judicial intervention or be blocked from taking office again.
In either event, Natthaphong said the party would not encourage its supporters to take to the streets for the kind of mass protests seen repeatedly in Thailand in the last 20 years.
“I think that the only reason our MPs or the PP would engage with street protests would be if Thailand has its next coup d’etat,” he said.
“We are going to move on from street protests because we are not going to give a reason to the army to do a coup d’etat.”


China’s Wang warns US official over support to Philippines in sea dispute: state media

China’s Wang warns US official over support to Philippines in sea dispute: state media
Updated 28 August 2024
Follow

China’s Wang warns US official over support to Philippines in sea dispute: state media

China’s Wang warns US official over support to Philippines in sea dispute: state media
  • ‘The US must not use bilateral treaties as an excuse to undermine China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity’

BEIJING: China’s top diplomat Wang Yi on Wednesday warned visiting US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan over supporting the Philippines in the disputed South China Sea, state media reported.

“The United States must not use bilateral treaties as an excuse to undermine China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, nor should it support or condone the Philippines’s actions of infringement,” Wang told Sullivan, according to state broadcaster CCTV.

Sullivan landed in the Chinese capital on Tuesday for a three-day trip, saying on arrival he looked forward to “a very productive round of conversations” with foreign minister Wang.

Washington’s allies Japan and the Philippines have blamed China in the past week for raising regional tensions, with Tokyo accusing Beijing of violating its airspace and Manila calling it the “biggest disrupter” of peace in Southeast Asia.

According to CCTV, Wang emphasized to Sullivan that “China is firmly committed to safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights over the South China Sea islands.”

Sullivan and Wang have met five times over the past year-and-a-half — in Washington, Vienna, Malta and Bangkok, as well as alongside US President Joe Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping at a November 2023 summit in California.


Sweden charges Qur’an burners with hate crime

Sweden charges Qur’an burners with hate crime
Updated 28 August 2024
Follow

Sweden charges Qur’an burners with hate crime

Sweden charges Qur’an burners with hate crime
  • Relations between Sweden and several Middle Eastern countries were strained by the pair’s protests

STOCKHOLM: Swedish prosecutors on Wednesday charged two men with inciting ethnic hatred over several protests involving the burning of Qur’ans in 2023, which sparked widespread outrage in Muslim countries.
Salwan Momika, a Christian Iraqi who burned Qur’ans at a slew of protests, and co-protester Salwan Najem were charged with “agitation against an ethnic group” on four occasions in the summer of 2023.
“Both men are prosecuted for having on these four occasions made statements and treated the Qur’an in a manner intended to express contempt for Muslims because of their faith,” senior prosecutor Anna Hankkio said in a statement.
According to the charge sheet, the duo desecrated the Qur’an, including burning it, while making derogatory remarks about Muslims — in one case outside a Stockholm mosque.
“In my opinion, the men’s statements and actions fall under the provisions on agitation against an ethnic or national group and it is important that this matter is tried in court,” the prosecutor added.
Relations between Sweden and several Middle Eastern countries were strained by the pair’s protests.
Iraqi protesters stormed the Swedish embassy in Baghdad twice in July 2023, starting fires within the compound on the second occasion.
In August last year, Sweden’s intelligence service Sapo raised its threat level to four on a scale of five after the Qur’an burnings had made the country a “prioritized target.”
The Swedish government condemned the desecrations while noting the country’s constitutionally protected freedom of speech and assembly laws.
Earlier this month, prosecutors charged Swedish-Danish right-wing activist Rasmus Paludan with the same crime over a 2022 protest in the southern city of Malmo, which also included burning the Qur’an.
In October 2023, a Swedish court convicted a man of inciting ethnic hatred with a 2020 Qur’an burning, the first time the country’s court system had tried the charge for desecrating Islam’s holy book.
Prosecutors have previously said that under Swedish law, the burning of a Qur’an can be seen as a critique of the book and the religion, and thus be protected under free speech.
However, depending on the context and statements made at the time, it can also be considered “agitation against an ethnic group.”