AI, analytics and the future of Saudi Arabia’s workforce

AI, analytics and the future of Saudi Arabia’s workforce

AI, analytics and the future of Saudi Arabia’s workforce
The state wants to cultivate a workforce of 20,000 AI and data specialists. (Shutterstock)
Short Url

Saudi Arabia is making significant strides in the world of artificial intelligence, in pursuit of its ambitious initiatives to position the Kingdom as a global leader in AI.

The National Strategy for Data and Artificial Intelligence, launched in 2020, is a cornerstone of these efforts, seeking to attract $20 billion in investments by 2030 and cultivate a workforce of 20,000 AI and data specialists.

These initiatives are inextricably linked to Vision 2030’s overarching goals of social reform and economic diversification, which together aim to establish Saudi Arabia as a regional leader in technology and innovation.

AI represents a further significant advancement in human progress. Historically, businesses have leveraged technology to enhance productivity and efficiency by automating tasks that once required human effort.

The current era, often referred to as the second machine age, is distinguished by numerous instances of machine intelligence and the integration of billions of interconnected systems working collectively to improve our ability to enhance our understanding of the world and to solve complex problems.

AI and advanced analytics enable more accurate predictions, better decision-making and the development of new business strategies. In Saudi Arabia, these technologies are poised to transform industries, necessitating a reevaluation of human-machine collaboration.

The potential economic impact within Saudi Arabia is substantial. According to a recent report by the professional services firm PwC, the projected economic impact of AI in the Middle East by 2030 is $320 billion, with an estimated $135.2 billion attributed to Saudi Arabia.

Additionally, McKinsey suggests that 41 percent of work activities in the Kingdom could be automated. This presents both significant opportunities and formidable challenges.

The rapid advancement of AI, particularly generative AI, is revolutionizing how we work and live. Tools like ChatGPT represent some of the fastest-adopted technologies in history, significantly impacting productivity and decision-making processes.

This intersection of AI and the workforce is particularly relevant for Saudi Arabia, which is making significant strides in AI adoption and workforce transformation as part of its Vision 2030 agenda.

To future-proof its workforce, Saudi Arabia is placing a strong emphasis on continuous learning and development in AI and data analytics. The country also recognizes that collaboration between government and the private sector is vital for driving workforce transformation and ensuring readiness for future challenges.

Preparing the Saudi workforce for an AI-driven future involves equipping workers with the necessary skills and fostering an environment of innovation and adaptability.

However, this transformation is not without its challenges. The rise of AI raises concerns about misinformation, manipulation and the delicate balance between human judgment and machine algorithms.

Despite these challenges, the potential benefits in terms of efficiency and innovation are substantial.

Preparing the Saudi workforce for an AI-driven future involves equipping workers with the necessary skills and fostering an environment of innovation and adaptability.

Nicholas C. Lovegrove

Generative models like ChatGPT redefine data analysis and idea generation. They offer unprecedented capabilities for enhancing human productivity and creativity. Leveraging AI to augment human abilities can lead to significant improvements in various sectors.

Still, it is crucial to adopt a balanced approach to AI integration, one that maximizes benefits while minimizing risks. This includes addressing ethical considerations to ensure AI promotes inclusivity and equity.

Broader societal challenges associated with AI, such as the “alignment problem” and the “containment problem” also need to be addressed.

The alignment problem concerns ensuring that AI systems’ objectives align with human values, while the containment problem involves preventing AI systems from acting outside their intended scope.

Tackling these issues is essential for responsible AI integration.

Saudi Arabia’s strategic investments and workforce development initiatives position the Kingdom to potentially become one of the global leaders of the AI revolution.

By focusing on ethical AI practices and fostering a culture of continuous learning and innovation, Saudi Arabia can ensure a prosperous and inclusive future, in which everyone in its workforce has equal opportunities to participate in and benefit from the AI-driven initiatives.

The Kingdom’s commitment to AI and analytics holds transformative potential, offering significant opportunities for productivity and innovation across various sectors.

As machines increasingly undertake cognitive tasks, the landscape of employment is changing, with human roles experiencing considerable transformation. For example, AI-powered chatbots are enhancing customer service efficiency, automated systems are streamlining data entry and robo-advisers are making financial services more accessible.

However, this shift should not be viewed as a conflict between human workers and machines. Rather, we should recognize the potential for augmentation, where AI can enhance human capabilities rather than merely replace them.

Despite these advancements, there remains a crucial need for human judgment and regulation to oversee AI systems, ensure ethical standards are met and address complex issues that machines alone cannot resolve.

By focusing on how AI can complement human intelligence, we can unlock new possibilities for innovation and productivity.

The journey toward an AI-driven future is filled with both opportunities and challenges. Saudi Arabia’s proactive approach, underpinned by Vision 2030 and significant investments in AI and workforce development, demonstrates its commitment to harnessing the power of AI for economic diversification and social reform.

By embracing AI and analytics while addressing ethical considerations, Saudi Arabia is well positioned to become a global leader in technology and innovation, paving the way for a future that is not only prosperous and inclusive but also forward-looking.

In shaping a world where the transformative power of AI acts as a catalyst for unprecedented progress, Saudi Arabia’s efforts resonate as a beacon of promise and potential.

• Nicholas C. Lovegrove is a professor of the practice of management at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Trump’s big plans on trade and more run up against laws of political gravity, separation of powers

Trump’s big plans on trade and more run up against laws of political gravity, separation of powers
Updated 6 min 27 sec ago
Follow

Trump’s big plans on trade and more run up against laws of political gravity, separation of powers

Trump’s big plans on trade and more run up against laws of political gravity, separation of powers
  • he laws of political gravity, the separation of powers and geopolitical realities are proving to be tougher to conquer than Trump will publicly admit

WASHINGTON: Once again, President Donald Trump’s biggest policy plans were stopped in their tracks.
On Wednesday, an obscure but powerful court in New York rejected the legal foundation of Trump’s most sweeping tariffs, finding that Trump could not use a 1977 law to declare a national emergency on trade imbalances and fentanyl smuggling to justify a series of import taxes that have unsettled the world. Reordering the global economy by executive fiat was an unconstitutional end-run around Congress’ powers, the three-judge panel of Trump, Obama and Reagan appointees ruled in a scathing rebuke of Trump’s action.
The setbacks fit a broader pattern for a president who has advanced an extraordinarily expansive view of executive power. Federal courts have called out the lack of due process in some of Trump’s deportation efforts. His proposed income tax cuts, now working their way through Congress, are so costly that some of them can’t be made permanent, as Trump had wished. His efforts to humble Harvard University and cut the federal workforce have encountered legal obstacles. And he’s running up against reality as his pledges to quickly end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza have turned into slogs.
The laws of political gravity, the separation of powers and geopolitical realities are proving to be tougher to conquer than Trump will publicly admit. As various legal skirmishes play out, he may have to choose between bowing to the limits of his power or trying to ignore the judicial system.
“If the latter, we may have a constitutional crisis,” said University of Texas history professor H.W. Brands.
After a second federal court on Thursday found Trump’s tariffs to be improper, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Trump administration expects to prevail in its judicial appeals but also indicated that officials are exploring other laws to implement tariffs. A federal appeals court said Thursday the government can continue to collect the tariffs under the emergency powers law for now as the Trump administration challenges the ruling, though the government could be obligated to refund the money if the ruling is upheld.
Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said there are two baseball caps in the room behind the Oval Office that say “Trump Always Wins” and Trump has been “right” about everything.
“Trump does always win these negotiations because we’re right,” Hassett said on Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria.” “These activist judges are trying to slow down something right in the middle of really important negotiations.”
Part of Trump’s challenge lies in the nature of the job, in which only the thorniest of problems cross his desk. But there’s also the fact that Trump’s keen instincts for what plays well on TV don’t necessarily help with the nitty-gritty of policy details.
By unilaterally ordering tariffs, deportations and other actions through the White House, Trump is bypassing both Congress and the broader public, which could have given more popular legitimacy to his policy choices, said Princeton University history professor Julian Zelizer.
“The president is trying to achieve his goals outside normal legal processes and without focusing on public buy-in,” Zelizer said. “The problem is that we do have a constitutional system and there are many things a president can’t do. The courts are simply saying no. The reality is that many of his boldest decisions stand on an incredibly fragile foundation.”
As Trump sees it, his tariffs would solve genuine problems. His “Liberation Day” taxes on imports would close persistent trade imbalances with other countries, with his 10 percent baseline tariff providing a stream of revenue to help offset the trillions of dollars in federal borrowing that would be created by his planned income tax cuts.
But when the financial markets panicked and the interest charged on US debt shot up, Trump backtracked and ratcheted down many of his tariffs to 10 percent while negotiations began to take place.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested this had been the plan all along to force new trade negotiations. But Trump shortly undercut him by saying on the White House South Lawn that he backed down because the financial markets were getting “yippy” — a reminder that Trump’s own improvizatory and disruptive style can upend any working policy process.
Trump still has tariffs in place on autos, steel and aluminum. Those are tied to the premise that imports would create national security risks based on previous investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. He could use other laws to start new investigations or temporarily impose tariffs, but the White House is more focused at the moment on challenging the court rulings.
“What is unprecedented is Trump asserting authority under a 1977 statute that had never been used for tariffs, not just for targeted tariffs, but the largest tariffs since the 1930s,” said Peter Harrell, a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who served in the Biden White House. “That’s what is unprecedented and unusual.”
Harrell said Trump could re-create many of his tariffs using other laws but “it would require more work and be a much more orderly process.”
Rice University history professor Douglas Brinkley said Trump’s sense of the presidency relies on a deep misreading of the office. He mistakenly assumes that the tariffs used in the 19th century to fund a much smaller federal government would now be able to pay for a much larger federal government. But he also assumes that power flows to and from him, rather than from institutions and the rule of law.
“He doesn’t seem to realize that anytime he doesn’t listen to the court orders that he’s making an anti-American statement,” Brinkley said. “It’s telling people that I’m bigger than the American Constitution, that judges are just errand boys for me.”
The Trump White House blamed its latest setback on the US Court of International Trade.
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said in a Bloomberg News interview that the judicial branch was part of the problem, keeping Trump from delivering on his promises.
“We’ve got courts in this country who are basically engaged in attacks on the American people,” Navarro said. “The president ran on stopping the fentanyl poisoning, stopping international trade unfair practices from stealing our factories and jobs. And courts keep getting in the way of that.”


White House acknowledges problems in RFK Jr.’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report

White House acknowledges problems in RFK Jr.’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report
Updated 14 min 5 sec ago
Follow

White House acknowledges problems in RFK Jr.’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report

White House acknowledges problems in RFK Jr.’s ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report
  • Kennedy has repeatedly said he would bring “radical transparency” and “gold-standard” science to the public health agencies

WASHINGTON: The White House will fix errors in a much-anticipated federal government report spearheaded by US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which decried America’s food supply, pesticides and prescription drugs.
Kennedy’s wide-ranging “Make America Healthy Again” report, released last week, cited hundreds of studies, but a closer look by the news organization NOTUS found that some of those studies did not actually exist.
Asked about the report’s problems, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the report will be updated.
“I understand there was some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed and the report will be updated.” Leavitt told reporters during her briefing. “But it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government.
Kennedy has repeatedly said he would bring “radical transparency” and “gold-standard” science to the public health agencies. But the secretary refused to release details about who authored the 72-page report, which calls for increased scrutiny of the childhood vaccine schedule and describes the nation’s children as overmedicated and undernourished.
Leavitt said that the White House has “complete confidence” in Kennedy.
“Minor citation and formatting errors have been corrected,” HHS Spokesman Andrew Nixon said in an emailed statement. He described the report as a “historic and transformative assessment by the federal government to understand the chronic disease epidemic afflicting our nation’s children.”
NOTUS reported Thursday that seven of the more than 500 studies cited in the report did not appear to have ever been published. An author of one study confirmed that while she conducted research on the topics of anxiety in children, she never authored the report listed. Some studies were also misinterpreted in the MAHA report. The problematic citations were on topics around children’s screen time, medication use and anxiety.
Kennedy’s MAHA report had already been stoking concerns among Trump loyalists, including farmers who criticized how the report characterized the chemicals sprayed on US crops.
The report is supposed to be used to develop policy recommendations that will be released later this year. The White House has requested a $500 million boost in funding from Congress for Kennedy’s MAHA initiative.


US supercomputer named after Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna to power AI and scientific research

US supercomputer named after Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna to power AI and scientific research
Updated 14 min 33 sec ago
Follow

US supercomputer named after Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna to power AI and scientific research

US supercomputer named after Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna to power AI and scientific research
  • Dell Technologies contracted with the energy department to build the computer
  • Not clear yet how the computer will rank on the listing of the world’s fastest supercomputers

BERKELEY, California: A new supercomputer named after a winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry will help power artificial intelligence technology and scientific discoveries from a perch in the hills above the University of California, Berkeley, federal officials said Thursday.
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced the project Thursday alongside executives from computer maker Dell Technologies and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
The new computing system at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will be called Doudna after Berkeley professor and biochemist Jennifer Doudna, who won a Nobel in 2020 for her work on the gene-editing technology CRISPR. It’s due to switch on next year.
“One of the key use cases will be genomics research,” said Dion Harris, a product executive in Nvidia’s AI and high-performance computing division, in an interview. “It was basically just a nod to her contributions to the field.”
Dell is contracted with the energy department to build the computer, the latest to be housed at Berkeley Lab’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center. Previous computers there have been named after other Nobel winners: Saul Perlmutter, an astrophysicist, and Gerty Cori, a biochemist.
It’s not clear yet how the computer will rank on the TOP500 listing of the world’s fastest supercomputers. The current top-ranked computer is El Capitan, located about an hour’s drive away at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. That’s followed by other supercomputers at US national labs in Tennessee and Illinois.


US-China tariff talks ‘a bit stalled,’ needs Trump, Xi input, Bessent says

US-China tariff talks ‘a bit stalled,’ needs Trump, Xi input, Bessent says
Updated 18 min 6 sec ago
Follow

US-China tariff talks ‘a bit stalled,’ needs Trump, Xi input, Bessent says

US-China tariff talks ‘a bit stalled,’ needs Trump, Xi input, Bessent says

US trade talks with China are “a bit stalled” and getting a deal over the finish line will likely need the direct involvement of President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday.
Two weeks after breakthrough negotiations led by Bessent that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world’s two biggest economies, Bessent told Fox News that progress since then has been slow, but said he expects more talks in the next few weeks.
“I believe we may at some point have a call between the president and party Chair Xi,” Bessent said.
“Given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity ... this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other,” he said. “They have a good relationship, and I am confident that the Chinese will come to the table when President Trump makes his preferences known.”
The US-China agreement to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China’s state-dominated, export-driven economic model, leaving those issues for future talks.
Since the mid-May deal, the Trump administration has concentrated on tariff negotiations with other major trading partners, including India, Japan and the European Union. Trump last week threatened 50 percent tariffs on EU goods, only to delay that threat.

A US trade court on Wednesday
ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act. But less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government’s appeal. The appeals court ordered the plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the administration to respond by June 9.
Bessent said earlier that some trading partners, including Japan, were negotiating in good faith and that he detected no changes in their postures as a result of the trade court ruling. Bessent said he would meet with a Japanese delegation on Friday in Washington.


At UN Security Council, US urges Russia to take Ukraine ceasefire deal

At UN Security Council, US urges Russia to take Ukraine ceasefire deal
Updated 50 min 57 sec ago
Follow

At UN Security Council, US urges Russia to take Ukraine ceasefire deal

At UN Security Council, US urges Russia to take Ukraine ceasefire deal
  • Threatens to step back as mediator if Russia makes wrong choice
  • Moscow responds that the ball is in Kyiv’s court now

UNITED NATIONS: The United States told the UN Security Council on Thursday that its proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine was “Russia’s best possible outcome” and President Vladimir Putin should take the deal.
The United States wants Russia to agree to a comprehensive 30-day land, air, sea and critical infrastructure ceasefire. A first round of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine on May 16 failed to reach an agreement on a ceasefire — which Moscow has said is impossible to achieve before certain conditions are met.
“We want to work with Russia, including on this peace initiative and an economic package. There is no military solution to this conflict,” Acting Deputy US Ambassador John Kelley told the Security Council. “The deal on offer now is Russia’s best possible outcome. President Putin should take the deal.”
US President Donald Trump began his second term in January vowing to swiftly end Russia’s three-year-old war in Ukraine. Kelley said the first US step was to put forward a proposal for an immediate, unconditional and comprehensive ceasefire, which had been accepted by Ukraine, pending Russia’s agreement.
“Since then, we have been urging Russia to accept a ceasefire,” he said.
“If Russia makes the wrong decision to continue this catastrophic war, the United States will have to consider stepping back from our negotiation efforts to end this conflict,” he warned, adding that Washington could also impose further sanctions on Russia.
Kelley said that after Trump and Putin spoke by phone last week, Russia was now expected to provide a term sheet broadly outlining its vision for a ceasefire in the conflict, which began when Moscow invaded its neighbor in February 2022.
“We will judge Russia’s seriousness toward ending the war, not only by the contents of that term sheet, but more importantly, by Russia’s actions,” said Kelley, condemning Russia’s recent attacks on Ukraine as not demonstrating “a desire for peace.”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday that Moscow had drafted a memorandum outlining a settlement position in the Ukraine war. But Ukraine said Moscow has not yet shared its proposal.
Russia’s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said Moscow intended to continue serious, direct negotiations with Ukraine. Russia has suggested a second round of direct talks take place on Monday in Istanbul.
“The ball is in Ukraine’s court: either talks, followed by peace, or the unavoidable defeat of Ukraine on the battlefield with different conditions for the conflict’s end,” Nebenzia told the Security Council.
Ukraine’s Deputy UN Ambassador Khrystyna Hayovyshyn said Russia was “not signaling any genuine intention to stop its war” and urged countries to impose stronger sanctions on Moscow.
“Ukraine has consistently demonstrated commitment to diplomacy and remains open to any format that can yield tangible results,” she said, but added that Kyiv would never recognize Russia’s claim to any occupied Ukrainian territory.
“We will not tolerate interference in sovereign decisions, including our defense or alliances. There must be no appeasement of the aggressor. Such attempts only embolden future aggression,” Hayovyshyn told the council.