Cybersecurity technology needs to move faster, says WEF panel

Cybersecurity technology needs to move faster, says WEF panel
Panel brings together experts from the private and public sectors to discuss the increasingly complex world of cybersecurity in an age dominated by technology. (WEF)
Short Url
Updated 22 January 2025
Follow

Cybersecurity technology needs to move faster, says WEF panel

Cybersecurity technology needs to move faster, says WEF panel

DUBAI: Artificial intelligence is a big topic of discussion at this year’s annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, which is being held under the central theme of “Collaboration for the Intelligent Age.”

A panel on Wednesday titled “Cutting through Cyber Complexity,” brought together experts from the private and public sectors to discuss the increasingly complex world of cybersecurity in an age dominated by technology.

Wired magazine’s global editorial director Katie Drummond, who moderated the panel, set the stage saying that “factors like AI and emerging technology, geopolitical instability, supply chain vulnerability and talent shortages” combined make cybersecurity considerations more complicated, potentially “exacerbating inequity across the board.” 

As governments push the adoption of technology, they must also ensure that the devices and platforms people use are safe, said Malaysia’s minister of digital, Gobind Singh Deo.

Last year, for example, Malaysia implemented the Cyber Security Act, establishing regulatory standards for the country’s cyber defenses, amended its data protection laws and introduced data-sharing legislation, he said.

The most important thing now, in this digital revolution, is speed, according to Oscar Lopez, Spain’s minister for digital transformation and civil service. 

In addition to regulation, which is devised and implemented in conjunction with the EU, Spain is investing in infrastructure, skills and education, he added.

With 66 percent of organizations being concerned about AI’s impact on cybersecurity, according to WEF’s latest “Global Security Outlook” report, there is an urgent need for governments and businesses to build systems to counter cyberattacks. 

Hoda Al-Khzaimi, associate vice provost for research translation and entrepreneurship at New York University Abu Dhabi, highlighted that cyber attackers have access to information and opportunity as well as the agility to build platforms and increase the threat level of attacks.

However, she added, there is room for improvement in the structures required to counter those attacks as evidenced by the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021. 

Like Lopez, Al-Khzaimi emphasized the need for speed in building faster and more agile structures, saying that attackers take seconds to decimate a system, which will take months and years to rebuild. 

This is partly because “larger companies are stuck with inertia and that’s really what’s causing all the issues,” said Jay Chaudhry, CEO, chairman and founder of IT security company Zscaler.

“Hackers have no inertia,” he said.

Chaudhry said organizations and governments need to move away from old technologies like firewalls and VPNs to a zero-trust cybersecurity architecture, which is based on the principle of not trusting anyone — even those inside the system or organization, unlike a firewall.

“Technology needs to move,” and it is not necessarily the government’s job to push it; if anything, “over-regulation can stop things,” he added. 

The CEO and co-founder of industrial cybersecurity technology firm Dragos, Robert Lee, echoed the sentiment.

He said: “We need a lot more (of an) approach to harmonization of regulation, especially for multinational (companies).”

Lee also presented an alternate view to the adoption of emerging technologies and automation, highlighting the perils of digitization.

“Some of these private companies are so excited to take that automation journey … that they really don’t understand some of the systems they’re putting in place,” he said.

“This means that when something goes wrong, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint the cause if the company hasn’t invested in the right systems ahead of time,” he added. 

Lee said that there is a lot of conversation around “the next big thing” and AI, but “you have no idea how little is being done correctly. The basics do work. It’s just (that) a lot of companies aren’t doing the basics.”

 


White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
Updated 01 November 2025
Follow

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
  • Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press, near the president's office
  • he policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon 

WEST PALM BEACH: US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday barred reporters from accessing part of the White House press office without an appointment, citing the need to protect “sensitive material.”
Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press — which is where Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s office is located and is near the Oval Office.
Reporters have until now been able to freely visit the area, often wandering up to try to speak to Leavitt or senior press officers to seek information or confirm stories.
Media are still allowed to access the area known as “Lower Press,” next to the famed White House briefing room, where more junior press officers have their desks, the memo said.
The policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon that major outlets including AFP refused to sign earlier this month.
The change at the White House was announced by the National Security Council in a memorandum titled “protecting sensitive material from unauthorized disclosure in Upper Press.”
“This memorandum directs the prohibition of press passholders from accessing... ‘Upper Press,’ which is situated adjacent to the Oval Office, without an appointment,” said the memo, addressed to Leavitt and White house Communications Director Steven Cheung.
“This policy will ensure adherence to best practices pertaining to access to sensitive material.”
It said the change was necessary because White House press officers were now routinely dealing with sensitive materials following “recent structural changes to the National Security Council.”
Trump has gutted the once powerful NSC, putting it under the control of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz was reassigned in May following a scandal over the use of the Signal app to plan strikes on Yemen.
Trump’s administration has made a major shake-up to access rules for journalists since his return to power in January.
Many mainstream outlets have seen their access to areas like the Oval Office and Air Force One reduced, while right-wing, Trump-friendly outlets have been given more prominence.
The White House also banned the Associated Press news agency from key areas where Trump speaks after it refused to recognize his order changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.