18 arrested in second day of staff-led protests over Microsoft’s ties to Israeli military

18 arrested in second day of staff-led protests over Microsoft’s ties to Israeli military
1 / 2
Redmond Police said demonstrators were arrested on multiple charges, including “trespassing, malicious mischief, resisting arrest, and obstruction,” as investigations are underway. (X: @RedmondWaPD)
18 arrested in second day of staff-led protests over Microsoft’s ties to Israeli military
2 / 2
Demonstrators poured red paint over the Microsoft logo at the company's headquarters on the second consecutive day of protests over its ties with Israel's military. (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 22 August 2025
Follow

18 arrested in second day of staff-led protests over Microsoft’s ties to Israeli military

18 arrested in second day of staff-led protests over Microsoft’s ties to Israeli military
  • Demonstators were arrested after they “resisted and became aggressive,” police say
  • Microsoft accused the returning protesters of “vandalism and property damage”

WASHINGTON: Police arrested 18 people on Wednesday during the second day of pro-Palestinian protests led by current and former Microsoft employees at the tech giant’s headquarters in Redmond, Washington.

The arrests came a day after officers dismantled an encampment set up by the worker-led campaign group “No Azure for Apartheid,” which is demanding Microsoft end its ties with the Israeli military amid reports that the company’s technology has been used to facilitate mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, and assist in selecting bombing targets during the war on Gaza.

Redmond police said they arrested 18 demonstators who “resisted and became aggressive” as officers tried to disperse the protests at Microsoft’s campus.

“A few protesters had poured paint over the Microsoft sign and on the ground. Others had blocked a pedestrian bridge and were using stolen tables and chairs from vendors to form a barrier,” Redmond police department said in a post on X.

 

 

In a statement to Arab News, Microsoft accused the returning protesters of “vandalism and property damage,” a day after 35 demonstrators had cleared the site following police orders that such activities were not permitted on private property.

“They also disrupted, harassed, and took tables and tents from local small businesses at a lunchtime farmer’s market for employees,” a Microsoft spokesperson told Arab News.

Demonstrators were arrested on multiple charges, including “trespassing, malicious mischief, resisting arrest, and obstruction,” as investigations are underway, the police department said, adding that no injuries were reported at the scene.

Organizers of the “No Azure for Apartheid” group told Arab News that those arrested included current and former Microsoft workers as well as Seattle community members.

They said protesters returned for the second day in a row “to escalate and force an end to the genocide powered by Microsoft technology.”

“Instead of listening to the (group’s) demands and ending its role in the daily massacre of Palestinians, Microsoft chose to militarize its campus,” the group said in a statement to Arab News. They accused the tech giant of enabling Israel’s military campaign and starvation in Gaza, as well as assisting the displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank.

The group noted that the demonstrations aimed to “demand Microsoft stop exploiting our labor to build technology that murders Palestinians.”

Microsoft has reiterated its pledge to conduct “a thorough and independent review of new allegations” raised earlier this month in a Guardian media investigation, which reported that Israel used the tech giant’s Azure cloud services to record millions of daily phone calls made by Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

“Microsoft will continue to do the hard work needed to uphold its human rights standards in the Middle East, while supporting and taking clear steps to address unlawful actions that damage property, disrupt business or that threaten and harm others,” the company’s spokesperson told Arab News.

On Friday, the tech giant said that it hired law firm Covington & Burling LLP to conduct the review on Israel’s commercial agreements with Microsoft and will make the findings public once the review is complete.


Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit
Updated 10 November 2025
Follow

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit
  • Trump’s lawyers say broadcaster must retract documentary or face action
  • BBC apologizes for ‘error of judgment,’ chair Shah rejects institutional bias

LONDON: US President Donald Trump has threatened the BBC with a billion-dollar lawsuit, US sources said, as the broadcaster apologized Monday for editing a speech that gave the impression he urged “violent action” just before the 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
Trump could seek $1 billion in damages from the BBC, a source close to his legal team said, amid a growing furor that prompted the resignations Sunday of two of the broadcaster’s top brass.
The source said the British broadcaster has been given until Friday to retract the 2024 documentary and apologize for the documentary broadcast just before the 2024 US presidential election.
Trump has been accused of launching lawsuits to stifle US media. But the latest controversy has reignited a debate over the British broadcaster, cherished by many but which has faced long-standing accusations of bias, from both ends of the political spectrum.
A spokesman for Trump’s private legal team confirmed that a letter had been sent to the BBC but did not give details.
“The BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the presidential election,” the spokesman said in a statement to AFP.
“President Trump will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception, and fake news.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

‘Vital role’ 

In a letter sent to MPs, BBC chairman Samir Shah said the broadcaster accepted that the editing of Trump’s speech for the documentary “did give the impression of a direct call for violent action.”
“The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment,” he added, vowing to reform oversight within the broadcaster.
Director general Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness stepped down over the escalating backlash on Sunday.
Trump promptly celebrated, accusing BBC journalists of being “corrupt” and “dishonest.” His press secretary called the broadcaster “100-percent fake news.”
However, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman told reporters the organization “has a vital role in an age of disinformation.”
“It’s important that the BBC acts swiftly to maintain trust and correct mistakes quickly when they occur,” he added.
The government is preparing a review of the BBC’s charter, which outlines the corporation’s governance and funding framework. The current charter ends in 2027.
The broadcaster, which has cut hundreds of jobs amid stretched finances, is funded by a license fee paid by anyone who watches live TV in Britain.
Some have welcomed the resignations as a timely reckoning for the BBC, while others fear the influence of right-wing detractors, including in the United States.
Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, urged Starmer to tell Trump to “keep his hands off” the BBC.
Former BBC journalist Karen Fowler-Watt, head of the journalism department at City St. George’s University in London, told AFP the institution was “now really in a situation of crisis.”
She noted it was “very difficult not to see this as a right-wing attack, given the media ecosystem in which we all now live.”

Controversies

In London, Britons were both critical and sympathetic.
Jimmy, who works in construction and declined to give his surname, told AFP the BBC’s reputation had been “tarnished” and it had “shown that they’re not impartial.”
But 78-year-old writer Jennifer Kavanagh said it has “always been attacked from the right and from the left.”
“They can never get it right,” she added.
Its latest crisis intensified after the right-wing Daily Telegraph newspaper reported last week that a former external standards adviser’s warnings of serious and widespread failings of impartiality and systemic bias had been ignored.
That included the editing of sections of Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech ahead of the mob attack on the US Capitol following the 2020 US presidential election.
It appeared he had told supporters he was going to walk there with them and “fight like hell,” whereas the president also told the audience in the intervening period “we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
Earlier this year, the BBC apologized for “serious flaws” in the making of another documentary, about the Gaza war, which the UK’s media watchdog deemed “materially misleading.”
It also faced criticism for failing to pull a livestream of punk-rap duo Bob Vylan during this year’s Glastonbury festival after its frontman made anti-Israel comments.