UK, Australia, Canada and Portugal recognize Palestinian state

Head of the Palestine Mission to the UK, Husam Zomlot reacts as he watches a television broadcast of Britain’s PM Keir Starmer formally recognising The Palestinian State on September 21, 2025 at their Mission in west London. (AFP)
Head of the Palestine Mission to the UK, Husam Zomlot reacts as he watches a television broadcast of Britain’s PM Keir Starmer formally recognising The Palestinian State on September 21, 2025 at their Mission in west London. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 September 2025
Follow

UK, Australia, Canada and Portugal recognize Palestinian state

Head of the Palestine Mission to the UK reacts as he watches a broadcast of Starmer formally recognizing The Palestinian State.
  • London’s step aligns it with more than 140 other nations but will irk both Israel and its main ally the US
  • Canada, Australia and Portugal also recognized a Palestinian state on Sunday and other countries are expected to do so this week at UNGA

LONDON: Britain, Australia, Canada and Portugal on Sunday recognized a Palestinian state in a seismic shift in decades of western foreign policy, triggering swift Israeli anger.

“Today, to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two-state solution, the United Kingdom formally recognizes the State of Palestine,” UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a message on X.

Britain and Canada became the first G7 countries to take the step, with France and other nations expected to follow at the annual UN General Assembly which opens Monday in New York.

 

“Canada recognizes the State of Palestine and offers our partnership in building the promise of a peaceful future for both the State of Palestine and the State of Israel,” Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on X.

“Recognizing the State of Palestine is therefore the fulfilment of a fundamental, consistent, and widely agreed policy,” Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel told reporters in New York ahead of the annual UN General Assembly, which opens Monday.

“Portugal advocates the two-state solution as the only path to a just and lasting peace, one that promotes coexistence and peaceful relations between Israel and Palestine,” he added.

It is a watershed moment for Palestinians and their decades-long ambitions for statehood, with the most powerful western nations having long argued it should only come as part of a negotiated peace deal with Israel.

But the move puts those countries at odds with the United States and Israel, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacting angrily and vowing to oppose it at the UN talks.

Calls for a Palestinian state “would endanger our existence and serve as absurd reward for terrorism,” Netanyahu said Sunday.

A growing number of longtime allies have shifted positions, as Israel has intensified its Gaza offensive, vowing to eliminate the Hamas Palestinian militants.

The Gaza Strip has suffered vast destruction, a spiralling death toll and a lack of food that has sparked a major humanitarian crisis since the start of the conflict which has drawn an international outcry.

“Special burden”

The UK government has come under increasing public pressure to act, with thousands rallying every month on the streets. A poll released by YouGov on Friday showed two-thirds of young Britons aged 18-25 supported Palestinian statehood.

Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy acknowledged at the UN in July that “Britain bears a special burden of responsibility to support the two-state solution.”

Over a century ago, the UK was pivotal in laying the groundwork for the creation of the state of Israel through the 1917 Balfour Declaration.

Three-quarters of UN members already recognize Palestinian statehood, with over 140 of the 193 having taken the step.

Starmer said in July that his Labour government intended to recognize a Palestinian State unless Israel took “substantive” steps including reaching a ceasefire in Gaza, getting more aid into the territory and confirming it would not annex the West Bank.

Starmer has also repeatedly called on Hamas to release the remaining hostages they captured in the 2023 attack, and is expected to set out new sanctions on the Palestinian militants.

Lammy told the BBC on Sunday that the Palestinian Authority — the civilian body that governs in areas of the West Bank — had been calling for the move for some time “and I think a lot of that is wrapped up in hope.”

“Will this feed children? No it won’t, that’s down to humanitarian aid. Will this free hostages? That must be down to a ceasefire.”

But he said it was an attempt to “hold out for” a two-state solution.

Palestinian foreign minister Varsen Aghabekian Shahin told AFP last week: “Recognition is not symbolic.”

“It sends a very clear message to the Israelis on their illusions on continuing their occupation forever,” she added.

“Worrying evolution”

Hamas’s 2023 attack on southern Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures.

Israel’s retaliatory campaign has killed at least 65,208 people, also mostly civilians, according to figures from the Gazan health ministry that the United Nations considers reliable.

Portugal said that it would also formally declare its recognition in New York on Sunday.

“By acting now, as the Portuguese government has decided, we’re keeping alive the possibility of having two states,” Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa said.

The long road to Palestinian statehood
An Arab News Deep Dive

Enter


keywords

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero

Indonesian activists protest plan to name Suharto as national hero
  • Suharto’s 32-year rule was marked by corruption, human rights violations
  • Activists are citing his role in some of the darkest periods in Indonesia’s history

JAKARTA: Indonesian activists are rallying against a government proposal to name as national hero the late military ruler Suharto who led the country for over three decades.

Suharto’s New Order military dictatorship was considered one of the most brutal and corrupt of the 20th century. The former president, who died in 2008, held power for 32 years before student-led protests forced him to step down in 1998, amid an economic crisis and deadly riots in Jakarta.

He was included in a list of 49 candidates to receive the national hero title this year, an honor bestowed annually on National Heroes’ Day on Nov. 10 for those considered to have made a significant contribution to the country.

The plan, which has yet to be finalized, has sparked protests among members of Indonesia’s civil society, who pointed to widespread allegations of human rights abuses and corruption during Suharto’s regime.

“In his 32-year reign, Suharto committed many human rights violations. He also came to power through a coup … corruption, collusion, and nepotism were also widespread during his rule,” Damairia Pakpahan, an Indonesian women’s rights activist based in Yogyakarta, told Arab News.

Pakpahan was part of a coalition of hundreds of Indonesian citizens and organizations, who signed a letter demanding the government to remove Suharto from the list of national hero candidates. A similar petition published online has received over 13,500 signatures so far.

Suharto “did not deserve to be granted a National Hero title,” the coalition said in the letter issued on Oct. 30, before detailing at least nine cases of gross human rights violations that took place under his rule.

This includes the unsolved violence during the riots in May 1998 as well as the 1965-66 killings, a series of countrywide political purges targeting members and alleged sympathizers of Partai Komunis Indonesia — at the time the third-largest communist party after China and the Soviet Union.

While an accurate and verified count of the dead is unlikely ever to be known, historians say that a total of 500,000 to 1 million people had been killed. Another 1.5 million had been imprisoned, while their family members still face stigma and discrimination, and many were prevented from holding government jobs up until recently.

“(The) Suharto government’s track record, particularly during the New Order era, demonstrates a pattern of authoritarian and repressive rule that had a far-reaching impact on the lives of the Indonesian people,” the civil society coalition said.

“Numerous policies and security operations implemented under Suharto’s rule resulted in serious human rights violations, ranging from murder and enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence, to land grabbing and systematic social discrimination.”

On Thursday, about 100 activists rallied near the presidential palace in Jakarta to protest Suharto’s candidacy for the national hero title. Some carried posters that read: “Stop the Whitewashing of the General of Butchery” and “Thousands Died But The Country Chose to Forget.”

Indonesia’s social and culture ministries have said that public input was part of the process to nominate national hero candidates. 

Culture Minister Fadli Zon, who heads the committee in charge of naming national heroes, said at a press conference that “there was never evidence” that Suharto was involved in the 1960s massacres, which scholars have said amounted to genocide due to its scale. 

“Every one of these candidates have fulfilled all the requirements … their struggles are clear, their background and life history, all of it has undergone academic evaluation … This includes (former) President Suharto, whose name has been suggested two, three times now … We are looking at their extraordinary contributions (to the country),” he told reporters earlier this week.

Andreas Harsono, senior Indonesia researcher at Human Rights Watch, told Arab News that the process to grant national hero status has always been controversial in Indonesia.

“Gen. Suharto, for instance, is a hero to some groups in Indonesia, but obviously, not a hero to many other groups, especially those who have suffered from his authoritarian regime, including the 1965 genocide,” he told Arab News.

“It’s much better if (the Indonesian government) is to end these jokes about national heroes. Let historians do their work and let the public decide their own respective heroes.”