US 'deeply disappointed' with Israeli occupier homes plan

Author: 
AGENCIES
Publication Date: 
Wed, 2011-09-28 04:01

"We are deeply disappointed," said State
Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, adding the US considered the move
"counterproductive to our efforts to resume direct negotiations between
the parties." "We have long urged both parties to avoid actions which
could undermine trust, including in Jerusalem, and we'll continue to work with
the parties to try to resume direct negotiations," she added.
The US reaction came hours after Israel approved a plan to
build 1,100 new homes in a Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem, a move
Palestinians slammed as a rejection of a proposal by the so called Quartet -
the United Nations, EU, United States and Russia — for new peace talks.
The project's passage on Tuesday is just one stage of a
lengthy, multi-year approvals process for the planned expansion of the Gilo
neighborhood, which lies in Jerusalem's south.
Meanwhile, the UN's political chief said Tuesday that Israel
and the Palestinians remain far apart on reaching a peace agreement but insisted
"now is time for everyone to give diplomacy a chance."
B. Lynn Pascoe told the UN Security Council that the main
obstacles to setting up a Palestinian state — a bid which Palestinian President
Mahmoud Abbas submitted last week despite a promised US veto and pressure to
drop the application — are political, not institutional.
He said that the main issue remains the "continuing
Israeli occupation and the ongoing Palestinian divide."
The remarks at the monthly briefing on the Middle East
highlighted the tenuous path confronting not only the Palestinians and
Israelis, but also the Quartet of Mideast mediators who have drafted a plan to
bring the two sides together, with an ultimate goal of achieving a deal by the
end of next year.
"Resuming negotiations, and making progress, is easier
said than done," Pascoe told the council. With the Quartet's proposal and
the push to restart negotiations, "this would be a moment where the
parties would be truly tested in their readiness to make serious proposals that
addressed the core concerns of the other."

old inpro: 
Taxonomy upgrade extras: