Al Jazeera coverage of Trump’s Jerusalem move ‘promoting hatred’

Al Jazeera coverage of a protest in Gaza showed a demonstrator taking out two pistols in front of the camera. (Screengrab)
Updated 12 December 2017

Al Jazeera coverage of Trump’s Jerusalem move ‘promoting hatred’

LONDON: Al Jazeera’s coverage of President Donald Trump’s recent decision to move the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem has been criticized for “promoting hatred and furthering tensions.”
As Trump’s decision sparked global outrage, with world leaders denouncing the move, international media gave extensive attention to global demonstrations.
However, the Qatari-owned channel’s reporting of the issue has been described as irresponsible for giving airtime to extremist views.
“The concern with Al Jazeera Arabic’s coverage of Trump’s Jerusalem announcement is that it gives airtime to some very extreme and violent comments, including calls by the terrorist group Hamas,” Tom Wilson, media commentator and fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, told Arab News.
During its daily evening program, Al Jazeera aired a tweet by Hamas — which is designated as a terrorist organization by some countries — calling the Arab and Muslim nations to mark last Friday as a “day of anger against the occupation.”
“If news agencies publicize such views in an uncritical manner, without sufficiently challenging them, then this can risk promoting hatred and furthering tensions,” Wilson said.
The Arabic news channel also aired an interview with a demonstrator who said that Palestine will be liberated only by the “child who holds a knife, and by the martyr who sacrificed his life for Palestine.”
In another report, a protester tells an Al Jazeera reporter that the US president will “meet the jihad by Muslims and Arabs.”
In another segment, the channel broadcasted a protest from Gaza where a demonstrator took out two pistols in front of the camera.
“At such a volatile time in the region channels like Al Jazeera Arabic should avoid the kind of coverage that further enflames feelings that might contribute to violence,” Wilson said. Al Jazeera’s reporting has previously been criticized for inciting hate and giving a platform to extremists and terrorists. Al Jazeera featured the Muslim Brotherhood cleric Yusuf Qaradawi, who used to promote anti-Semitism and infamously blessed suicide attacks in a 2013 interview.

Media experts accused Al Jazeera of misrepresenting information under the guise of freedom of expression and accuracy.
“All broadcasters have a responsibility to inform the public in a way that is fair and balanced and that does not involve any kind of incitement,” Wilson said.
Dalia Al-Aqidi, a media analyst and political talk-show host, said that the Qatari network had played a “dirty role” in regional conflicts.
“Manipulating the emotions of its viewers was one of the reasons behind the popularity of Al Jazeera TV, which played a dirty role in the Middle Eastern conflicts, starting with its coverage of the war in Iraq, insulting the people who were happy to get rid of the late President Saddam Hussein,” she said.
Al Jazeera has supported Osama bin Laden and other terrorists, who have “killed more innocent Muslims than what they call ‘the enemy’ —  whoever the enemy is — spreading hatred and sectarianism by legitimizing violence under the pretext of liberating Palestine.”
She added: “We just need to watch its coverage about the violent demonstrations and type of speakers they host, to realize that it’s quite clear ... Al Jazeera is taking a firm stand against the United States and Saudi Arabia. (It is) using the suffering of the people to serve its political agenda.”
Abdellatif El-Menawy, an Egyptian media analyst, pointed to the dangers of media stoking violence.
“I fully respect the anger of the Palestinian people, Arab peoples and many sympathizers around the world,” he told Arab News.
“But the mistake is when some media deal with these positions for incitement that will not lead to a positive outcome but will complicate the situation even more.”
Al Jazeera did not respond to a request for ­comment.


Saudis switch from TV to mobile video

A man records a video with his phone in Berlin, Germany, August 24, 2019. (REUTERS)
Updated 26 August 2019

Saudis switch from TV to mobile video

  • Short online films are watched most during the traditional primetime TV slot between 5pm and 11pm, for an average of 53 minutes

RIYADH: More Saudis watch short online videos than traditional TV, a new study suggests. Researchers found that more than 85 percent of Saudis viewed videos lasting less than 10 minutes at least once a day. Eight out of 10 watched premium professional short films every day, while only seven out of 10 watched traditional TV every day.
Short online films are watched most during the traditional primetime TV slot between 5pm and 11pm, for an average of 53 minutes.
Of those surveyed, 93 percent said mobile video helped them discover new and unique content, and 91 percent said it stimulated their minds, put them in a positive mood and gave them a chance to take a break from their daily lives.
“Saudis are some of the most avid short-form video consumers in the world,” said Andy Pang, head of international marketing science at Snapchat, the multimedia messaging app, which commissioned the survey.

HIGHLIGHT

A new study shows that while more video is being consumed than ever before in the Kingdom, there are major changes in viewing habits.

“With one of the highest levels of mobile Internet penetration, and one of the highest social messaging and media usage rates in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia is poised for a mobile, short-form expansion that may even eclipse more established markets.”
For the survey, Snapchat commissioned the National Research Group, an independent market research company, to conduct a representative study of 869 Saudis.