US media experts demand review of New York Times story on sexual violence by Hamas on Oct. 7

US media experts demand review of New York Times story on sexual violence by Hamas on Oct. 7
(AFP, screenshot NYT)
Short Url
Updated 03 May 2024
Follow

US media experts demand review of New York Times story on sexual violence by Hamas on Oct. 7

US media experts demand review of New York Times story on sexual violence by Hamas on Oct. 7
  • 64 American journalism professionals sign letter accusing the newspaper of failing to do enough to investigate and confirm the evidence supporting the allegations in its story
  • It concerns a story headlined ‘Screams Without Words: Sexual Violence on Oct. 7’ that ran on the front page of the newspaper on Dec. 28

CHICAGO: Sixty-four American journalism professionals signed a letter sent to New York Times bosses expressing concern about a story published by the newspaper that accused Palestinians of sexual violence against Israeli civilians during the Oct. 7 attacks.
It concerns a story headlined “Screams Without Words: Sexual Violence on Oct. 7” that ran on the front page of the newspaper on Dec. 28 last year.
In the letter, addressed to Arthur G. Sulzberger, chairperson of The New York Times Co., and copied to executive editors Joseph Kahn and Philip Pan, the journalism professionals, who included Christians, Muslims and Jews, demanded an “external review” of the story.
It is one of several news reports by various media organizations that have been used by the Israeli government to counter criticisms of the brutal nature of its near-seven-month military response to the Hamas attacks, during which more than 34,000 Palestinians have been killed and most of the homes, businesses, schools, mosques, churches and hospitals in Gaza have been destroyed, displacing more than a million people, many of whom now face famine.
The letter, a copy of which was obtained by Arab News, states that “The Times’ editorial leadership … remains silent on important and troubling questions raised about its reporting and editorial processes.”
It continues: “We believe this inaction is not only harming The Times itself, it also actively endangers journalists, including American reporters working in conflict zones, as well as Palestinian journalists (of which, the Committee to Protect Journalists reports, around 100 have been killed in this conflict so far).”
Shahan Mufti, a journalism professor at the University of Richmond, a former war correspondent and one of the organizers of the letter, told Arab News that The New York Times failed to do enough to investigate and confirm the evidence supporting the allegations in its story.
“The problem is the New York Times is no longer responding to criticism and is no longer admitting when it is making mistakes,” he said. The newspaper is one of most influential publications in the US, he noted, and its stories are republished by smaller newspapers across the country.
This week, the Israeli government released a documentary, produced by pro-Israel activist Sheryl Sandberg, called “Screams Before Silence,” which it said “reveals the horrendous sexual violence inflicted by Hamas on Oct. 7.” It includes interviews with “survivors from the Nova Festival and Israeli communities, sharing their harrowing stories” and “never-before-heard eyewitness accounts from released hostages, survivors and first responders.”
In promotional materials distributed by Israeli consulates in the US, the producers of the documentary said: “During the attacks at the Nova Music Festival and other Israeli towns, women and girls suffered rape, assault and mutilation. Released hostages have revealed that Israeli captives in Gaza have also been sexually assaulted.”
Critics have accused mainstream media organizations of repeating unverified allegations made by the Israeli government and pro-Israel activists about sexual violence on Oct. 7, with some alleging it is a deliberate attempt to fuel anti-Palestinian sentiment in the US and help justify Israel’s military response.
Some suggest such stories have empowered police and security officials in several parts of the US to crack down on pro-Palestinian demonstrations, denouncing the protesters as “antisemitic” even though some of them are Jewish.
New York Mayor Eric Adams, for example, asserted, without offering evidence, that recent protests by students on college campuses against the war in Gaza had been “orchestrated” by “outside agitators.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the protests against his country’s military campaign in Gaza are antisemitic in nature.
Jeff Cohen, a retired associate professor of journalism at Roy H. Park School of Communications at Ithaca College, told Arab News The New York Times story was “flawed” but has had “a major impact in generating support for Israeli vengeance” in Gaza.
He continued: “Israeli vengeance has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of civilians. That’s why so many professors of journalism and media are calling for an independent investigation of what went wrong.
“That (New York Times) story, along with other dubious or exaggerated news reports — such as the fable about Hamas ‘beheading babies’ that President Biden promoted — have inflamed war fever.”
Cohen said the US media “too often … have promoted fables aimed at inflaming war fever,” citing as an example reports in 1990 that Iraqi soldiers had removed babies from incubators after their invasion of Kuwait. The assertions helped frame anti-Iraqi public opinion but years later they were proved to be “a hoax,” he added.
“On Oct. 7, Hamas committed horrible atrocities against civilians and it is still holding civilian hostages,” Cohen said. “Journalists must tell the truth about that, without minimizing or exaggerating, as they must tell the truth about the far more horrible Israeli crimes against Palestinian civilians.
“The problem is that the mainstream US news media have a long-standing pro-Israel bias. That bias has been proven in study after study. Further proof came from a recently leaked New York Times internal memo of words that its reporters were instructed to avoid — words like ‘Palestine’ (‘except in very rare cases’), ‘occupied territories’ (say ‘Gaza, the West Bank, etc.’) and ‘refugee camps’ (‘refer to them as neighborhoods, or areas’).”
Mufti, the University of Richmond journalism professor, said belligerents “on both sides” are trying to spin and spread their messages. But he accused Israeli authorities in particular of manipulating and censoring media coverage, including through the targeted killing of independent journalists, among them Palestinians and Arabs, and said this was having the greatest impact among the American public.
“Broadly speaking, a lot of the Western news media, and most of the world news media, do not have access to the reality in Gaza,” he said. “They don’t know. It is all guesswork.
“They are all reporting from Tel Aviv, they are reporting from Hebron, they are reporting from the West Bank. Nobody actually knows what the war looks like. It is all secondhand information.
“Most of the information is coming through the Israeli authorities, government and military. So, of course, the information that is coming out about this war is all filtered through the lens of Israel, and the military and the government.”
Mufti said the story published by The New York Times “probably changed the course, or at least influenced the course, of the war.”
He said it appeared at a time when US President Joe Biden was pushing to end the Israeli military campaign in Gaza “and it entirely changed the conversation. It was a very consequential story. And it so happens it was rushed out and it had holes in it … and it changed the course of the war.”
Mohammed Bazzi, an associate professor with the Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute at New York University, told Arab News the letter demanding an “external review” of the story is “a simple ask.”
He added: “This story, and others as well, did play a role” in allowing the Israeli military to take action beyond acceptable military practices “and dehumanize Palestinians.” Such dehumanization was on display before Oct. 7, Bazzi said.
“In the Western media there seemed to be far less sympathetic coverage of Palestinians in Israel’s war in Gaza as a consequence of these stories,” he continued.
“We have seen much less profiles of Palestinians … we are beyond 34,000 Palestinians killed but we don’t have a true number or the true scale of the destruction in Gaza — there could be thousands more dead under the rubble and thousands more who will die through famine and malnutrition. This will not stop, as a consequence of what Israel has done.”
Bazzi said the Western media has contributed to the dehumanization of Palestinians more than any other section of the international media, while at the same time humanizing the Israeli victims.
“The New York Times has a great influence on the US media as a whole and sets a standard” for stories and narratives that other media follow, which is “more pro-Israel and less sympathetic to Palestinians,” he added.
Bazzi, among others, said The New York Times has addressed “only a handful of many questions” about its story and needs to do more to present a more accurate account of what happened on Oct. 7.
The letter to New York Times bosses states: “Some of the most troubling questions hovering over the (Dec. 28) story relate to the freelancers who reported a great deal of it, especially Anat Schwartz, who appears to have had no prior daily news-reporting experience before her bylines in The Times.”
Schwartz is described as an Israeli “filmmaker and former air force intelligence official.”
Adam Sella, another apparently inexperienced freelancer who shared the byline on the story, is reportedly the nephew of Schwartz’s partner. The only New York Times staff reporter with a byline on the story was Jeffrey Gettleman.
Media scrutiny of the story revealed that “Schwartz and Sella did the vast majority of the ground reporting, while Gettleman focused on the framing and writing,” according to the letter.
The New York Times did not immediately respond to requests by Arab News for comment.


Facebook seeks to attract young adults with new community, video features

Facebook seeks to attract young adults with new community, video features
Updated 04 October 2024
Follow

Facebook seeks to attract young adults with new community, video features

Facebook seeks to attract young adults with new community, video features
  • Facebook announced two new tabs called Local and Explore that would help people expand their networks and make new connections

AUSTIN: Facebook, one of the original social media networks, has become known as the platform of parents and grandparents, while young adults take up photo and video apps like Instagram and TikTok.
Meta, the company that owns Facebook, is setting out to change that.
While Facebook was originally centered on helping users stay in touch with family and friends, the future lies in helping people expand their networks and make new connections, which lines up with how younger generations use the service, said Tom Alison, head of Facebook at Meta.
“We see young adults turn to Facebook when they make a transition in life. When they move to a new city, they’re using Marketplace to furnish their apartments. When they become parents, they’re joining parenting groups,” Alison said during an interview in Austin, Texas, ahead of an event on Friday with content creators.
During the event, Facebook announced two new tabs called Local and Explore, currently being tested in select cities and markets and which aggregate content from across the platform. The Local tab shows users nearby events, community groups and local items for sale, and the Explore tab recommends content based on a user’s interests.
An increased focus on young adults will be key to bringing in new users as Facebook faces vast competition for their attention. Short-form video app TikTok has 150 million users in the US and is wildly popular among Gen Z, prompting Meta to introduce its copycat product called Reels in 2021.
Young adults on Facebook spend 60 percent of their time watching videos and more than half watch Reels daily. The company said it would also roll out an updated video tab in coming weeks that collects short-form, live and longer videos in one place.
Facebook’s dating feature, launched in 2019 and which lets users flip through suggested profiles, has seen a 24 percent year-over-year increase in conversations started among young adults in the US and Canada, the company said.
At the pop-up event in Austin, a small booklet summed up the platform’s positioning for the future: “Not your mom’s (Facebook),” the title read.


British regulator upholds complaint against The Telegraph for labeling Muslim organization ‘extremist’

British regulator upholds complaint against The Telegraph for labeling Muslim organization ‘extremist’
Updated 04 October 2024
Follow

British regulator upholds complaint against The Telegraph for labeling Muslim organization ‘extremist’

British regulator upholds complaint against The Telegraph for labeling Muslim organization ‘extremist’
  • Newspaper inaccurately called Muslim Association of Britain ‘extremist’ following a remark by then minister Michael Gove
  • In response to complaints, The Telegraph issued a correction and attributed mistake to ‘human error’

LONDON: The Independent Press Standards Organisation has upheld a complaint filed by the Muslim Association of Britain against The Telegraph for inaccurately labeling the organization as “extremist.”

The decision, announced on Thursday, followed a seven-month investigation into an article published in March, which wrongly described MAB as extremists.

“IPSO has upheld our complaint against The Telegraph for falsely labelling us as an extremist organisation, after Michael Gove’s abused parliamentary privilege in promoting a discredited and politicised definition of extremism,” said MAB in a post on X.

The regulator concluded that the newspaper violated the Editors’ Code of Practice by “failing to take care not to publish inaccurate information” and “for failing to offer a correction to a significant inaccuracy with sufficient promptness.”

The article, written by right-wing commentator Nick Timothy, claimed MAB was “one of several organizations declared extremist by Michael Gove in Parliament.” However, Gove had actually stated that MAB raised concerns due to its “Islamist orientation” and that the government would assess whether it met the definition of extremism.

In response to the complaint, The Telegraph issued a correction on its Corrections and Clarifications page, attributing the error to “human error.”

“While the correction is welcome, we urge the media to reflect on their responsibility to report facts and avoid spreading harmful falsehoods,” said MAB.

The decision comes at a critical moment, with British media facing accusations of bias in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, further complicating discussions on Islamophobia and antisemitism and highlighting ongoing challenges for Muslim organizations in the press, particularly in the context of extremism.


Elon Musk’s X fails bid to escape Australian fine

Elon Musk’s X fails bid to escape Australian fine
Updated 04 October 2024
Follow

Elon Musk’s X fails bid to escape Australian fine

Elon Musk’s X fails bid to escape Australian fine
  • Elon Musk’s X loses legal bid to avoid a $417,000 fine levelled by Australia’s online watchdog
  • In June, X fended off a separate legal suit brought by Australia’s eSafety Commission

SYDNEY: Elon Musk’s X on Friday lost a legal bid to avoid a $417,000 fine levelled by Australia’s online watchdog, which has accused the platform of failing to stamp out harmful posts.
Australia’s eSafety Commission approached what was then Twitter in February 2023, demanding the company explain how it was tackling the spread of child sexual abuse content.
The following month Twitter was merged into Musk’s newly formed X Corp, which was eventually fined for “incomplete” responses to the commission’s repeated requests.
X Corp. argued in Australia’s Federal Court that it did not need to respond because the commission had first targeted Twitter, a company that no longer existed.
“X Corp. has failed on all its claims,” Justice Michael Wheelahan found in a decision handed down on Friday.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant — a former Twitter employee — welcomed the court’s decision.
“Had X Corp’s argument been accepted by the court it could have set the concerning precedent that a foreign company’s merger with another foreign company might enable it to avoid regulatory obligations in Australia.”
Inman Grant has previously said X’s efforts to rid the platform of graphic sexual and violent content amounted to “empty talk.”
The commission must now fight a separate legal battle in a bid to enforce the fine — one of many skirmishes pitting the Australian government against tech mogul Musk.
Musk likened the Australian government to “fascists” earlier this year, attacking proposed laws that would fine social media giants for failing to stem the spread of misinformation.
In June, X fended off a separate legal suit brought by Australia’s eSafety Commission.
The watchdog had sought a global takedown order forcing X to remove “extremely violent” videos showing the stabbing of a Sydney preacher.
But it dropped the case after a preliminary hearing, a move celebrated by Musk as a free speech triumph.
Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist,” has clashed with politicians and digital rights groups worldwide, including in the European Union, which could decide within months to take action against X with possible fines.
In Brazil, where X has effectively been suspended after it ignored a series of court directives, Musk has responded by blasting the judge as an “evil dictator cosplaying as a judge.”


Google says it will stop linking to New Zealand news if proposed new law passed

Google says it will stop linking to New Zealand news if proposed new law passed
Updated 04 October 2024
Follow

Google says it will stop linking to New Zealand news if proposed new law passed

Google says it will stop linking to New Zealand news if proposed new law passed
  • New Zealand government to progress legislation that ensures fair revenue sharing between operators of digital platforms and news media entities

WELLINGTON: Google said on Friday it will stop linking to New Zealand news articles and ditch the agreements it has with local news organizations, if the country’s government goes ahead with a law to force tech giants to pay a fair price for content that appears on their feeds.
The New Zealand government in July confirmed it would progress legislation started by the previous Labour Party-led government that ensures fair revenue sharing between operators of digital platforms and news media entities. The proposed legislation is still in review and is likely to see changes including some to bring it more in line with Australian legislation.
Caroline Rainsford, Google New Zealand Country Director said in a blog post that if the bill as it currently stands becomes law, Google would be forced to make significant changes to its products and investments.
“We’d be forced to stop linking to news content on Google Search, Google News or Discover surfaces in New Zealand and discontinue our current commercial agreements and ecosystem support with New Zealand news publishers,” Rainsford said.
Google, which is owned by Alphabet Inc., is concerned that bill is contrary to the idea of the Internet being open, that it will be harmful to small publishers and that the uncapped financial exposure provides business uncertainty.
New Zealand Minister for Media and Communications Paul Goldsmith said he was considering the range of views in the sector.
“We are still in the consultation phase and will make announcements in due course,” he said in a statement. “My officials and I have met with Google on a number of occasions to discuss their concerns, and will continue to do so.”
Although minority government coalition partner ACT does not support the legislation, it is likely to find enough cross party support to pass once finalized.
Australia introduced a law in 2021 that gave the government power to make Internet companies negotiate content supply deals with media outlets. A review released by the Australian government in 2022 found it largely worked.


Advertising network TBWA is committed to ‘building a future’ in Saudi Arabia, says global CEO

Advertising network TBWA is committed to ‘building a future’ in Saudi Arabia, says global CEO
Updated 03 October 2024
Follow

Advertising network TBWA is committed to ‘building a future’ in Saudi Arabia, says global CEO

Advertising network TBWA is committed to ‘building a future’ in Saudi Arabia, says global CEO
  • Earlier this year, parent company Omnicom announced its MidEast RHQ will be based in Riyadh

DUBAI: Creative advertising network TBWA and its parent company Omnicom are looking forward to reinforcing their presence in Saudi Arabia, said Troy Ruhanen, global CEO of TBWA.

“We’re committing to really building a future there (Saudi Arabia),” which included working with more local clients and developing Saudi talent, he said during a recent visit to the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

From Jan. 1, 2025, Ruhanen will serve as the global CEO of the newly formed organization Omnicom Advertising Group, which brings together the group’s creative and advertising agencies and networks BBDO, DDB, TBWA, Goodby Silverstein & Partners, Zimmerman, and others.

As he prepares for the new role, Ruhanen said that he is eager to explore the (Saudi) marketplace” from both perspectives: TBWA’s to finish the year and Omnicom Advertising Group’s to look at possibilities for next year. 

This June, as a testament to its commitment to the Kingdom, Omnicom announced the establishment of a Middle East regional headquarters in Riyadh, bringing together 10 Omnicom agency brands including BBDO, DDB, TBWA, OMD, PHD, Hearts and Science, and FleishmanHillard.

Currently, TBWA has a mix of local and international talent in Saudi Arabia, partly owing to global clients, because “there are people who are more familiar with those global clients right now,” Ruhanen said. 

However, he added that the network plans “to grow a very locally informed, local leadership kind of base. 

“We know that’s our destiny, and it’s just a matter of making sure that we plan ourselves and transition ourselves to that right place.” 

TBWA has several proprietary platforms and units such as Backslash, self-described as a cultural intelligence unit; NEXT, a global innovation practice based on analytics and strategy; and the Collective AI Platform to harness the power of artificial intelligence for employees and clients.

Launched in June, Collective AI is a suite of generative AI services powered by partnerships with the likes of Microsoft, Adobe and Google.

“AI is not meant to be an answer machine,” but rather “a catalyst for original thinking,” Ruhanen said.

The platform has been built by feeding in various strategies, case studies, and so on, to make it a more “informed practice,” he said. 

In terms of the adoption of AI, Ruhanen said there were some “mature corporations” that understood the current boundaries of AI such as regulation and privacy, and there are others who “want to talk about how they’re doing all of these things all at once.”

TBWA’s priority was to protect its clients while also experimenting, within legal boundaries, to see what was possible, he said.

The conversation around AI tended to be dominated by the idea of efficiency and speeding up the creative process, which was the wrong way of looking at it, he said.

He added: “It’s about enabling a better, more accurate, and more informed way of working, (which) is giving us the best place to launch our creative minds and come up with the original solutions that no one has ever seen.

“It can’t be about an efficiency mindset; it has got to be about a growth mindset.”

Addressing concerns about AI’s threat to human talent, Ruhanen recounted a 1994 article by technology magazine WIRED with the headline “Is Advertising Dead?” Over the years, there have been several such articles questioning the role of advertising and agencies in an increasingly digital world.

However, in the past three decades, advertising agencies have “grown tremendously,” he said.

AI will not replace human talent or creative agencies, but will “change the nature of how we operate and the skills we’re going to require,” which means there will be a shift “from a service mindset to much more of a strategic mindset,” Ruhanen said.

“A lot of people have predicted what the future of this business is going to look like, and they’ve been sorely wrong for many years,” he said.