Britain’s PM urges Israel and Hezbollah to ‘step back from brink’ of war

Britain’s PM urges Israel and Hezbollah to ‘step back from brink’ of war
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer attends a breakfast meeting with Italian business leaders at Villa Wolkonsky in Rome, Italy, on September 16, 2024 (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 September 2024
Follow

Britain’s PM urges Israel and Hezbollah to ‘step back from brink’ of war

Britain’s PM urges Israel and Hezbollah to ‘step back from brink’ of war
  • Diplomacy vital for peace, Keir Starmer tells 79th UN General Assembly
  • UK to break from past ‘paternalism,’ listen more to solve global conflict

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned members of the UN General Assembly on Thursday that the world was in a “slide into greater and greater conflict, instability and injustice,” and called on Israel and Hezbollah to stand down.

Starmer said the UK would return to “responsible global leadership,” suggesting the country would play a greater role in helping to bring peace to war-torn regions of the world, including in Middle East.

“This starts with addressing the rising tide of conflict and preventing a regional war in the Middle East.

“I call on Israel and Hezbollah: Stop the violence, step back from the brink. We need to see an immediate ceasefire to provide space for a diplomatic settlement,” Starmer said at the 79th UN General Assembly meeting.

“And we are working with all partners to that end, because further escalation serves no one. It offers nothing but more suffering for innocent people on all sides, and the prospect of a wider wall that no one can control, and with consequences that none of us can foresee.”

Starmer said the continuing crisis in Gaza was an indictment of the international community.

“This is intimately linked with the situation in Gaza where again, we need to see an immediate ceasefire. It shames us all that the suffering in Gaza continues to grow. The answer is diplomacy, the release of all the hostages, and the unfettered flow of aid to those in need,” Starmer said.

“That is the only way to break this devastating cycle of violence and begin the journey towards a political solution for the long term which delivers the long-promised Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel.”

He added: “Conflict touches more countries now than at any time in the history of this assembly around the world, more fires are breaking out and burning with ever greater intensity. Exacting a terrible toll in Gaza, Lebanon, Ukraine, Sudan, Myanmar, Yemen, and beyond.”

On Sudan, Starmer said it was the “worst humanitarian crisis in the world today.” And added: “We need to see greater action to deliver aid and to deliver peace. The world cannot look away. And we must stand up for international law.”

On Iran, Starmer said Tehran was not fulfilling its obligations. “Iran continues to expand its nuclear activity in violation of its international commitments.”

On the uses of artificial intelligence, he said: “Incredible new technologies like AI are being deployed for military use without agreed rules. These are difficult challenges to grip and too urgent to ignore. That’s why the new Pact for the Future is so important.

“We must put new energy and creativity into conflict resolution and conflict prevention, reverse the trend towards ever-greater violence, make the institutions of peace fit for purpose, and hold members to their commitments under the UN Charter.”

He called for a structural revamp of the UN Security Council to achieve these goals, and make it “a more representative body, willing to act — not paralyzed by politics.

“We want to see permanent African representation on the council, Brazil, India, Japan and Germany as permanent members and more seats for elected members as well.

“Finally, to support this, we will also change how the UK does things. Moving from the paternalism of the past towards partnership for the future. Listening a lot more, speaking a bit less. Offering game-changing British expertise and working together in the spirit of equal respect.”

Starmer has served as UK prime minister since 2024 and as leader of the Labour Party since 2020.


China warns Taiwan relying on US for independence will ‘inevitably hit a wall’

China warns Taiwan relying on US for independence will ‘inevitably hit a wall’
Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

China warns Taiwan relying on US for independence will ‘inevitably hit a wall’

China warns Taiwan relying on US for independence will ‘inevitably hit a wall’
  • Beijing takes aim at a Pacific tour by the self-ruled island’s President Lai Ching-te
  • Lai’s trip, which has included two stops on US soil, draws criticism from China
BEIJING: China warned Taiwan Friday that relying on the United States to help it seek independence “will inevitably hit a wall,” as Beijing took aim at a Pacific tour by the self-ruled island’s President Lai Ching-te this week.
Lai’s trip, which has included two stops on US soil, has drawn a barrage of criticism from China, which claims Taiwan as part of its territory and opposes any international recognition of the island.
Lai this week held a phone call with US Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, which also angered Beijing.
“Seeking independence with the help of the United States will inevitably hit a wall, and using Taiwan to contain China is doomed to fail,” foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters on Friday.
He added that China has “lodged solemn representations” with Washington and urged it to “stop emptying and gutting the one-China principle.”
Asked about Lai’s comment on Friday that he was “confident” that Taiwan would deepen cooperation with incoming US president Donald Trump, Lin warned the United States to “cease meddling in Taiwan-related affairs.”
During a Friday press conference, Lai also urged democracies to be “more united” to counter growing authoritarianism.
He also insisted that Taiwan and China were “not subordinate to each other.”
Asked to respond to the latter, Lin said that “separatist activities... are the biggest threats to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.”
“No matter what they say or do, they cannot change the objective fact that Taiwan is part of China, nor can they stop the historical trend that China... will inevitably reunify,” he added.

Hong Kong court rejects first legal challenge to new security law

Hong Kong court rejects first legal challenge to new security law
Updated 6 min 15 sec ago
Follow

Hong Kong court rejects first legal challenge to new security law

Hong Kong court rejects first legal challenge to new security law
  • First legal challenge to the city’s newly enacted national security law brought by a jailed protester
  • Ma Chun-man, known as ‘Captain America 2.0, was imprisoned under the national security law

HONG KONG: A senior Hong Kong judge sided with the government on Friday and dismissed the first legal challenge to the city’s newly enacted national security law, which had been brought by a jailed protester.
Ma Chun-man — known as “Captain America 2.0” for carrying a replica of the Marvel superhero’s shield during democracy rallies in 2019 — was imprisoned for “inciting secession” under a national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020.
He had hoped to receive a one-third sentence remission — typically granted to inmates for good behavior — and be released in March.
But the passage of another national security law this year effectively banned remission for people convicted of national security crimes, and Ma’s request for early release was denied.
Ma challenged the decision, but on Friday the court said the new system was “sufficiently precise and certain” for prisoners to know how to earn an early release.
“There is no question of Mr. Ma being subject to any additional or heavier penalty by operation” of the new rules, High Court judge Alex Lee ruled.
“The applicant’s substantive judicial review is dismissed,” said Lee, who is among a pool of jurists selected by Hong Kong’s leader to hear security cases.


US, Japan and Philippine forces jointly patrol in South China Sea after hostilities involving China

US, Japan and Philippine forces jointly patrol in South China Sea after hostilities involving China
Updated 34 min 42 sec ago
Follow

US, Japan and Philippine forces jointly patrol in South China Sea after hostilities involving China

US, Japan and Philippine forces jointly patrol in South China Sea after hostilities involving China
  • Two Philippine security officials said the patrol was staged about 74 kilometers from Scarborough Shoal
  • Scarborough Shoal is a fishing area hotly disputed by Beijing and Manila off the northwestern Philippines

MANILA: The United States deployed a reconnaissance aircraft while Japan and the Philippines sent navy ships in a joint patrol in the disputed South China Sea on Friday, two days after the allied forces condemned actions by Chinese coast guard vessels against Philippine patrol ships.
The US Indo-Pacific Command said the joint patrol was conducted in the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone by allies and partners to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight” and “other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace.”
Those phrases are used by the US, Japan and the Philippines to oppose China’s increasingly aggressive actions in the disputed waters.
Two Philippine security officials said the patrol was staged about 40 nautical miles (74 kilometers) from Scarborough Shoal, a fishing area hotly disputed by Beijing and Manila off the northwestern Philippines. The two officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they didn’t have authority to discuss such details publicly.
China claims the South China Sea virtually in its entirety and has guarded it assertively with its coast guard, navy and suspected militia fleets. They have confronted forces from rival claimant states including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei.
Indonesia also has had faceoffs with Chinese coast guard ships escorting fishermen in the gas-rich Natuna waters in the southern fringes of the South China Sea.
The joint naval patrol, the latest in recent months by the Philippines, the US and their security partners, was delayed by several typhoons that battered the region and was not in reaction to a confrontation on Wednesday that involved Chinese and Philippine ships off Scarborough Shoal, the two Philippine officials said.
The Philippine coast guard said Chinese coast guard vessels, backed by navy ships, fired powerful water cannons and blocked and sideswiped a much smaller Philippine bureau of fisheries vessel escorted by coast guard ships off Scarborough Shoal.
The Philippine vessels were delivering fuel, food and other aid to Filipino fishermen in the shoal, which has been closely guarded by the Chinese coast guard since a tense 2012 territorial standoff with Philippine ships.
The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs protested the Chinese actions.
The Chinese coast guard provided another account of the incident. It said the Philippine vessels encroached on China’s territory, prompting it to take action. It said, without offering proof, that a Philippine vessel maneuvered in a way that led to a collision.
The United States, Japan, the European Union and other Western allies expressed alarm over the hostilities, which have increased in frequency since last year.
Japan, which also has territorial conflicts with Beijing in the East China Sea, said the “use of water cannon and obstructive maneuvers undermine the safety of ship and crew.” It’s ambassador to Manila, Endo Kazuya, said “Japan upholds the rule of law and opposes any actions which increase tensions.”
Japan is providing 1.6 billion yen ($10.6 million) in security assistance this year to provide the Philippine navy with coastal radars, inflatable boats and other defense equipment to strengthen surveillance of Philippine sea lanes, including in the South China Sea. Japan has also helped improve the Philippine air force’s aerial surveillance radar, the two countries said Thursday.
The US has warned that it is obligated to defend the Philippines, a treaty ally, if Filipino forces come under attack in the South China Sea.
The US defense commitment to the Philippines has received strong bipartisan support in Washington, which Philippine officials say they expect will continue under the incoming Trump administration.


Bangladesh court bans publication of speeches by ousted Prime Minister Hasina

Bangladesh court bans publication of speeches by ousted Prime Minister Hasina
Updated 06 December 2024
Follow

Bangladesh court bans publication of speeches by ousted Prime Minister Hasina

Bangladesh court bans publication of speeches by ousted Prime Minister Hasina
  • The decision came a day after Hasina made her first public speech in a virtual address to supporters of her Awami League party in New York
  • She accused interim leader Muhammad Yunus of perpetrating genocide, failing to protect minorities, especially Hindus, since her ouster

DHAKA: A special tribunal in Bangladesh on Thursday banned the publication of any speeches by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who is in exile in India after being ousted in August following mass protests.
The decision came a day after Hasina made her first public speech in a virtual address to supporters of her Awami League party in New York. In the speech, she accused Bangladesh’s interim leader, Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus, of perpetrating genocide and failing to protect minorities, especially Hindus, since her ouster.
The Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal made the decision in response to a request by government prosecutors for a ban on any speeches by Hasina on mainstream or social media, prosecutor Golam Monawar Hossain Tamim said.
Hasina fled to India after being ousted in a mass uprising in July and August in which hundreds of protesters were killed and thousands were injured. She faces many court cases over the deaths, including some on charges of crimes against humanity. The tribunal has already issued arrest warrants for Hasina and her close aides, and the government has sought help from the international police organization Interpol for her arrest.
Prosecutors said in their request to the tribunal that some speeches and phone calls by Hasina had been disseminated on electronic media and could interfere in the investigation of the charges against her by influencing or frightening witnesses.
“If speeches like these are published and broadcast, we won’t be able to bring witnesses to the tribunal during trials,” Tamim said.
He said the tribunal also ordered authorities to remove leaked speeches and phone conversations from media platforms.
Hasina established the tribunal during her 15-year rule. It was used to try people accused of war crimes during Bangladesh’s war of independence with Pakistan in 1971. Politicians belonging mainly to the Jamaat-e-Islami party were executed after being found guilty by the tribunal.
On Wednesday, Hasina told her supporters in New York that there had been plans to assassinate her and her sister Sheikh Rehana just like their father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, an independence leader who was assassinated in 1975 along with most of his family. Only Hasina and her younger sister survived because they were visiting Germany at that time.
She said armed protesters had been instructed to head to her residence in Dhaka and she was forced to flee to India so that security guards would not have to fire at the approaching crowd.
“If the security guards opened fire, many lives would have been lost,” she said. “I was forced to leave. I told them not to open fire, no matter what happened.”
Media reports said more such public speeches are planned by Hasina to address her supporters in the coming weeks.
Hasina has good relations with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Tensions between India and Muslim-majority Bangladesh have grown since her departure over incidents such as the jailing of a prominent Hindu leader in Bangladesh and attacks on a diplomatic office in India by Hindus.
Yunus has been meeting with political and religious leaders urging them to stay united. On Wednesday, he held a dialogue with most political parties except Hasina’s Awami League party and the Jatiya Party which are facing severe challenges under the Yunus-led administration.
On Thursday, Yunus met with religious leaders and said there was no division among Bangladeshis when it comes to national issues.
Bangladesh has been facing crucial challenges since Hasina’s ouster in August amid mob justice, rising commodity prices, errant street protests and an unstable economy. The security situation remains a major concern. About 700 inmates including many criminals and radical Islamists still remain at large after jailbreaks during the political chaos in August.


South Korea’s President Yoon must be suspended, his party leader says

South Korea’s President Yoon must be suspended, his party leader says
Updated 06 December 2024
Follow

South Korea’s President Yoon must be suspended, his party leader says

South Korea’s President Yoon must be suspended, his party leader says
  • Yoon Suk Yeol shocked the nation on Tuesday when he suddenly imposed martial law
  • He rescinded the declaration about six hours later after parliament voted to oppose the decree

SEOUL: South Korea’s ruling party leader said on Friday President Yoon Suk Yeol needs to be removed from power for trying to impose martial law, as the government denied reports it was preparing to issue another martial law declaration.
Yoon shocked the nation and his own ruling People Power Party on Tuesday when he gave the military sweeping emergency powers in order to root out what he called “anti-state forces” and overcome obstructionist political opponents.
He rescinded the declaration about six hours later after parliament, including some members of his party, voted to oppose the decree.
The main opposition Democratic Party has submitted a motion in parliament to impeach Yoon and scheduled a vote for Saturday evening.
Speaking after a ruling People Power Party (PPP) meeting at the parliament on Friday, leader Han Dong-hoon said Yoon had ordered the arrest of prominent politicians on the grounds they were among those “anti-state forces.”
The presidential office later denied any such order had been given, the Yonhap news agency reported.
Fearing another attempt to declare martial law, opposition lawmakers rotated through parliament’s plenary session hall on Friday to block any such attempt, a Democratic Party official said.
Acting Defense Minister Kim Seon-ho said reports there may be another attempt to impose martial law were not true.
Han said earlier there was “a high risk of extreme actions such as this emergency martial law being repeated” while Yoon remained in power, putting the country in “great danger.”
On Thursday, the ruling party said it was against impeachment, but Han suggested that stance may be shifting in light of “credible evidence” that Yoon had intended to arrest and detain political leaders at Gwacheon, just south of Seoul.
“I believe that President Yoon Suk Yeol’s immediate suspension of office is necessary to protect the Republic of Korea and its people in light of the newly revealed facts,” Han said.
He did not explicitly call for impeachment or respond to reporters when asked for clarification.
Some party members urged Yoon to resign before the vote, saying they did not want a repeat of the 2016 impeachment of then-President Park Geun-hye, which triggered the implosion of the conservative party and a victory by liberals in presidential and general elections.
“We cannot impeach the president tomorrow and hand over the regime to Lee Jae-Myung’s Democratic Party,” PPP lawmaker Yoon Sang-hyun told reporters.
To succeed, an impeachment bill would need support from two-thirds of the 300-member assembly. Yoon’s party has 108 legislators, so eight would have to side with the opposition for the bill to pass.
If parliament votes to impeach, the president is suspended from exercising his powers until an impeachment trial is held by the Constitutional Court. The prime minister serves as leader in acting capacity.
UNDER INVESTIGATION
Yoon has not been seen in public since rescinding martial law early on Wednesday and did not attend the PPP meeting on Friday.
Following media reports Yoon was on his way to parliament, opposition lawmakers poured out to the main lobby of the parliament building and set up a scrum to block him if he came.
The assembly speaker asked Yoon not to come to parliament even if he planned to, and Yoon’s office denied any such plans.
National police have launched investigations into the president and Kim Yong-hyun, the defense minister who allegedly encouraged him to declare martial law and who has since resigned.
Government and military prosecutors had also decided to conduct a joint investigation into the martial law decision, according to broadcaster YTN.
Details were slowly emerging about the chaos that engulfed Seoul on Tuesday night following Yoon’s surprise declaration, which stirred painful memories of the country’s long years of military rule following World War Two.
Kwak Jong-geun, the special warfare commander, said he defied an order from then-defense minister Kim to drag lawmakers out of parliament, and instead ordered his troops not to enter the area where lawmakers were meeting.
“I knew it would be disobedience, but I did not order that mission. I told them not to go in,” Kwak told an opposition lawmaker’s YouTube channel. Kwak also said he ordered his troops not to carry live ammunition.
Ahn Gwi-ryeong, a spokesperson for the opposition Democratic Party, said she believed the people had already psychologically impeached Yoon.
Images of Ahn grappling with a soldier and grabbing hold of his gun outside parliament on Tuesday went viral on social media as a symbol of the country’s defiance against martial law.
“Who could trust a president declaring martial law almost like a child playing games or entrust the nation to such leadership?” she said on Thursday.
Yoon’s approval rating plunged to a new low of 13 percent, according to the latest Gallup Korea poll released on Friday.