Google hit with $425M fine in the US for invading users’ privacy, $381M in France for a similar offense

Google hit with $425M fine in the US for invading users’ privacy, $381M in France for a similar offense
The Google logo is seen on the Google house at CES 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 04 September 2025
Follow

Google hit with $425M fine in the US for invading users’ privacy, $381M in France for a similar offense

Google hit with $425M fine in the US for invading users’ privacy, $381M in France for a similar offense
  • US jury found the tech giant of guilty of violations by continuing to collect data for millions of users who had switched off a tracking feature in their Google account
  • France's data protection authority In Paris gives Google six months to ensure ads are no longer displayed between emails in Gmail users’ inboxes without prior consent

SAN FRANCISCO/PARIS: Alphabet’s Google was told by a federal jury in the US on Wednesday to pay $425 million for invading users’ privacy and slapped with a fine of 325 million euros ($381 million) in France for a similar offense.

The jury found the tech giant of guilty of violations by continuing to collect data for millions of users who had switched off a tracking feature in their Google account.

The verdict comes after a trial in the federal court in San Francisco over allegations that Google over an eight-year period accessed users’ mobile devices to collect, save, and use their data, violating privacy assurances under its Web & App Activity setting.
The users had been seeking more than $31 billion in damages.
The jury found Google liable on two of the three claims of privacy violations brought by the plaintiffs. The jury found that Google had not acted with malice, meaning it was not entitled to any punitive damages.
A spokesperson for Google confirmed the verdict. Google had denied any wrongdoing.
The class action lawsuit, filed in July 2020, claimed Google continued to collect users’ data even with the setting turned off through its relationship with apps such as Uber, Venmo and Meta’s Instagram that use certain Google analytics services.
At trial, Google said the collected data was “nonpersonal, pseudonymous, and stored in segregated, secured, and encrypted locations.” Google said the data was not associated with users’ Google accounts or any individual user’s identity.
US District Judge Richard Seeborg certified the case as a class action covering about 98 million Google users and 174 million devices.
Google has faced other privacy lawsuits, including one earlier this year where it paid nearly $1.4 billion in a settlement with Texas over allegations the company violated the state’s privacy laws.
Google in April 2024 agreed to destroy billions of data records of users’ private browsing activities to settle a lawsuit that alleged it tracked people who thought they were browsing privately, including in “Incognito” mode. 

In France, the data protection authority Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) said ordered Google to pay 325 million euros ($381 million) for improperly displaying ads to Gmail users and using cookies, both without Google account users’ consent.
The CNIL also gave Google six months to ensure ads are no longer displayed between emails in Gmail users’ inboxes without prior consent, and that users give valid consent to the creation of a Google account for the placement of ad trackers.
Failing that, Google and its Irish subsidiary would both have to pay a penalty of 100,000 euros per day of delay, CNIL said in a statement.
A Google spokesperson said the company was reviewing the decision and said that users have always been able to control the ads they see in their products.
In the past two years, Google has made updates to address the commission’s concerns, including an easy way to decline personalized ads when creating a Google account, and changes to the way ads are presented in Gmail, the spokesperson said.

 


BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim
Updated 14 November 2025
Follow

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim
  • Trump team demanded compensation, apology
  • Broadcaster says it has no plans to rebroadcast documentary

LONDON: The British Broadcasting Corporation sent a personal apology to US President Donald Trump on Thursday but said there was no legal basis for him to sue the public broadcaster over a documentary his lawyers called defamatory.
The documentary, which aired on the BBC’s “Panorama” news program just before the US presidential election in 2024, spliced together three parts of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol. The edit created the impression he had called for violence.
“While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim,” the broadcaster said in a statement.
Lawyers for the US president threatened on Sunday to sue the BBC for damages of up to $1 billion unless it withdrew the documentary, apologized to the president and compensated him for “financial and reputational harm.”

No plans to rebroadcast
By asserting that Trump’s defamation case lacks merit, the BBC effectively signaled that it believes his claim for financial damages is equally untenable. But the broadcaster did not directly address Trump’s financial demand.
In its statement, the BBC said Chair Samir Shah on Thursday “sent a personal letter to the White House making clear that he and the corporation were sorry for the edit.” Shah earlier in the week apologized to a British parliamentary oversight committee and said the edit was “an error of judgment.”
British culture minister Lisa Nandy said on Friday it was right that the BBC had apologized to Trump.
“They’ve rightly accepted that they didn’t meet the highest standards and that’s the basis on which the chairman of the board has offered this apology to the President of the United States,” she told Times Radio. In its statement on Thursday, the BBC added that it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
Earlier on Thursday, the BBC said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph newspaper, over the editing by another of its programs, “Newsnight,” of the same speech.
The BBC has been thrown into its biggest crisis in decades after two senior executives resigned amid allegations of bias, including about the edit of Trump’s speech. The claims came to light because of a leaked report by a BBC standards official.
Founded in 1922 and funded largely by a license fee paid by TV-watching Britons, the BBC is without a permanent leader as the government weighs how it should be funded in the future.
It is a vital instrument of Britain’s “soft power” globally. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he believed in a “strong and independent” BBC.