ICC all set to give war crimes verdict on Sudan militia chief

ICC all set to give war crimes verdict on Sudan militia chief
Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (right) is seen during an ICC confirmation hearing in The Hague on May 24, 2021, over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity he allegedly committed during the Darfur conflict in 2003-04. (ANP via AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 October 2025
Follow

ICC all set to give war crimes verdict on Sudan militia chief

ICC all set to give war crimes verdict on Sudan militia chief
  • Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman faces 31 counts of crimes allegedly carried out in Darfur from 2003 to 2004
  • Prosecutors say he was a leading member of Sudan’s infamous Janjaweed militia. He has denied all char

THE HAGUE: The International Criminal Court (ICC) on Monday hands down its verdict on a feared Sudanese militia chief accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity during brutal attacks in Darfur.
Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman, also known by the nom de guerre Ali Kushayb, faces 31 counts of crimes including rape, murder and torture allegedly carried out in Darfur between August 2003 and at least April 2004.
Prosecutors say he was a leading member of Sudan’s infamous Janjaweed militia, who participated “enthusiastically” in multiple war crimes.
But Abd-Al-Rahman, who was born around 1949, has denied all the charges, telling the court they have got the wrong man.
“I am not Ali Kushayb. I do not know this person... I have nothing to do with the accusations against me,” he told the court at a hearing in December 2024.
Abd-Al-Rahman fled to the Central African Republic in February 2020 when a new Sudanese government announced its intention to cooperate with the ICC’s investigation.
He said he then handed himself in because he was “desperate” and feared authorities would kill him.
“I had been waiting for two months in hiding, moving around all the time, and I was warned that the government wanted to arrest me, and I was afraid of being arrested,” he said.
“If I hadn’t said this, the court wouldn’t have received me, and I would be dead now,” added the suspect.
Fighting broke out in Sudan’s Darfur region when non-Arab tribes, complaining of systematic discrimination, took up arms against the Arab-dominated government.
Khartoum responded by unleashing the Janjaweed, a force drawn from among the region’s nomadic tribes.
The United Nations says 300,000 people were killed and 2.5 million displaced in the Darfur conflict in the 2000s.

‘Severe pain’ 

During the trial, the ICC chief prosecutor said Abd-Al-Rahman and his forces “rampaged across different parts of Darfur.”
He “inflicted severe pain and suffering on women, children and men in the villages that he left in his wake,” said Karim Khan, who has since stepped down as he faces allegations of sexual misconduct.
Abd-Al-Rahman is also thought to be an ally of deposed Sudanese leader Omar Al-Bashir, who is wanted by the ICC on genocide charges.
Bashir, who ruled Sudan with an iron fist for nearly three decades, was ousted and detained in April 2019 following months of protests in Sudan.
He has not, however, been handed over to the ICC, based in The Hague, where he also faces multiple charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
ICC prosecutors are hoping to issue fresh arrest warrants related to the current crisis in Sudan.
Tens of thousands have been killed and millions displaced in a war between Sudan’s army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which grew out of the Janjaweed militia.
The conflict, marked by claims of atrocities on all sides, has left the northeast African country on the brink of famine, according to aid agencies.
Local leaders in the Kalma camp in South Darfur are renting a Starlink satellite Internet connection on Monday to let survivors watch the verdict.
The area is under RSF control, and the camp is facing a cholera outbreak and a severe hunger crisis.


FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say
Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

FBI fires additional agents who participated in investigating Trump, AP sources say

WASHINGTON: The FBI has continued its personnel purge, forcing out additional agents and supervisors tied to the federal investigation into President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The latest firings came despite efforts by Washington’s top federal prosecutor to try to stop at least some of the terminations, people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.
The employees were told this week that they were being fired but those plans were paused after D.C. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro raised concerns, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss personnel matters.
The agents were then fired again Tuesday, though it’s not clear what prompted the about-face. The total number of fired agents was not immediately clear.
The terminations are part of a broader personnel upheaval under the leadership of FBI Director Kash Patel, who has pushed out numerous senior officials and agents involved in investigations or actions that have angered the Trump administration. Three ousted high-ranking FBI officials sued Patel in September, accusing him of caving to political pressure to carry out a “campaign of retribution.”
Spokespeople for Patel and Pirro didn’t immediately respond to messages seeking comment on Tuesday.
The FBI Agents Association, which has criticized Patel for the firings, said the director has “disregarded the law and launched a campaign of erratic and arbitrary retribution.”
“The actions yesterday — in which FBI Special Agents were terminated and then reinstated shortly after, and then only to be fired again today — highlight the chaos that occurs when long-standing policies and processes are ignored,” the association said. “An Agent simply being assigned to an investigation and conducting it appropriately within the law should never be grounds for termination.”
The 2020 election investigation that ultimately led to special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of Trump has come under intense scrutiny from GOP lawmakers, who have accused the Biden administration Justice Department of being weaponized against conservatives. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has in recent weeks released documents from the investigation provided by the FBI, including ones showing that investigators analyzed phone records from more than a half dozen Republican lawmakers as part of their inquiry.
The Justice Department has fired prosecutors and other department employees who worked on Smith’s team, and the FBI has similarly forced out agents and senior officials for a variety of reasons as part of an ongoing purge that has added to the tumult and sense of unease inside the bureau.
The FBI in August ousted the head of the bureau’s Washington field office as well as the former acting director who resisted Trump administration demands to turn over the names of agents who participated in Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigations. And in September, it fired agents who were photographed kneeling during a racial justice protest in Washington that followed the 2020 death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.