Media watchdogs condemn Israeli airstrike that killed 3 journalists in Gaza, call for investigation

Media watchdogs condemn Israeli airstrike that killed 3 journalists in Gaza, call for investigation
Family members and colleagues carry the bodies of Palestinian journalists killed in an Israeli strike, during a funeral procession in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip on Jan. 22, 2026. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 January 2026
Follow

Media watchdogs condemn Israeli airstrike that killed 3 journalists in Gaza, call for investigation

Media watchdogs condemn Israeli airstrike that killed 3 journalists in Gaza, call for investigation
  • International Press Institute, Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders among organizations demanding urgent action

DUBAI: Media watchdogs including the International Press Institute, the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders have spoken out against Israel’s treatment of media workers following an airstrike that killed 3 journalists in Gaza on Wednesday.

Those killed were Mohammed Salah Qashta, Abdul Raouf Shaat and Anas Ghneim.

The Israeli military said the attack targeted what it had identified as “several suspects” operating a drone and “affiliated with Hamas.”

According to eyewitnesses, the journalists were using a drone to record aid distribution by the Egyptian Relief Committee when the strike hit one of the committee’s vehicles.

The IPI called for an “immediate and credible investigation” and renewed pressure on the international community to take “concrete actions” to hold Israel accountable.

IPI executive director Scott Griffen said the Israeli government has “failed to credibly investigate attacks on journalists” and that the “international community has failed to hold Israel to account for its pattern of targeting and killing journalists.”

He urged strong action, saying that “it is long past time for the international community to take concrete steps to end the cycle of complete impunity for killings of journalists in Gaza.”

The International Federation of Journalists and the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate also condemned the killings and attacks on journalists, calling for an immediate investigation.

The IFJ appealed to all “combatants in this conflict to do their utmost to safeguard journalists and media professionals,” said IFJ general secretary Anthony Bellanger.

“Media workers in areas of armed conflict must be treated and protected as civilians and allowed to perform their work without interference,” he added.

The PJS said that the direct shelling of the journalists’ vehicle constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity under international humanitarian law, in violation of the Geneva Conventions and UN resolutions that guarantee the protection of journalists during armed conflicts.

The syndicate called on the International Criminal Court to open “urgent and serious investigations” and to “issue arrest warrants against those responsible for the killing of journalists.”

It also urged the UN and other international organizations to take action “rather than limiting their response to statements of condemnation.”

The CPJ condemned the strike, which took place amid a ceasefire, said regional director Sara Qudah.

“Israel, which possesses advanced technology capable of identifying its targets, has an obligation under international law to protect journalists,” she said.

On Thursday, CPJ and RSF called on the 29 member states of the Media Freedom Coalition, in a joint letter, to take concrete steps toward guaranteeing media access to the Gaza Strip.

The move comes ahead of the Israeli Supreme Court hearing on Jan. 26 that will determine whether the press will have independent access to Gaza.

The signatories asked governments to send official representatives to the Jan. 26 hearing and to prioritize press freedom in their engagement with the new technocratic government, formed under a US-backed plan to govern Gaza.

They also urged states to ensure that the International Stabilization Force applies UN Security Council Resolution 2222, which recognizes journalists as civilians during armed conflict and affirms their right to protection and access.

“The inaction of states around the world encourages censorship and sets a dangerous precedent for other conflicts, to the detriment of civilian populations, humanitarian aid and political decisions based on verified facts,” said RSF director general Thibaut Bruttin.

More than 200 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the start of the war in October 2023, according to multiple reports.


Meta to charge Arab advertisers extra fee for reaching European audiences

Meta to charge Arab advertisers extra fee for reaching European audiences
Updated 11 March 2026
Follow

Meta to charge Arab advertisers extra fee for reaching European audiences

Meta to charge Arab advertisers extra fee for reaching European audiences
  • US tech giant told advertisers it will add fees ranging from 2 to 5 percent on image and video ads delivered on its platforms to offset digital service taxes
  • Charges are determined by where the audience is located, not where the advertiser is based

LONDON: Meta will from July 1 impose location-based surcharges on advertisers targeting audiences in six European countries, a move that will directly affect Arab businesses that run campaigns across the continent.

The US tech giant announced it will add fees ranging from 2 to 5 percent on image and video ads delivered on its platforms, including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, to offset digital service taxes imposed by individual governments.

Crucially, the charges are determined by where the audience is located, not where the advertiser is based.

That means Saudi, Emirati, Egyptian or other Arab companies paying to reach consumers in the UK, France or Italy will face the additional costs regardless of their own country’s tax arrangements with Meta.

Fees will apply at 2 percent for ads reaching UK audiences, 3 percent for France, Italy and Spain, and 5 percent for Austria and Turkiye.

“If you deliver $100 in ads to Italy, where there is a 3% location fee, you will be charged $100 (ad delivery), plus $3 (location fee), for $103 total,” the company wrote in an email to an advertiser initially reported by Bloomberg. “Note that any applicable VAT will be calculated on top of the total amount.”

The taxes have been introduced at different points, starting with France in 2019, though not the EU as a bloc.

Many tech companies report substantial sales in Europe and millions of users but pay minimal tax on profits. The goal is to claw back locally derived economic value, Bloomberg reported.

The move follows similar decisions by Google and Amazon, which have also begun passing European digital tax costs on to advertisers.

For Arab brands with growing European footprints, particularly in fashion, travel, hospitality and media, the new fees add another layer of cost to campaigns already subject to currency and targeting complexities.

Digital services taxes, levied as a percentage of revenues earned by major tech platforms in individual countries, have drawn criticism from Washington, which argues they unfairly target US companies.

Meta has been reached for comments.