The absurdity of war and its ethical echoes in AI

The absurdity of war and its ethical echoes in AI

The absurdity of war and its ethical echoes in AI
War, like a poorly programmed AI, often leads to catastrophic outcomes. (Shutterstock image)
Short Url

In a city where artificial intelligence promises to revolutionize everything from grocery shopping to pet care, one question looms larger than the latest tech trend: What happens when we forget the lessons of humanity in the quest for efficiency? As our screens flash with notifications, a local philosopher and self-proclaimed ethical warrior, Mr. Raf, urges us to reflect on the often-ignored costs of conflict — both in the battlefield and in our evolving digital landscape.

“War, like a poorly programmed AI, often leads to catastrophic outcomes,” Raf quipped during a recent lecture. “Blood is not even useful for making mud. It’s just messy!”

In the annals of history, war has always demanded a staggering price, and not just in dollars and cents. The most chilling aspect is the loss of human life. Each casualty in conflict is not merely a statistic; it represents a unique individual — someone with hopes, dreams, and loved ones. “When we wage war, we’re not just destroying buildings; we’re dismantling lives,” Raf stated, recalling the painful remnants of countless conflicts.

According to the World Health Organization, wars claim tens of thousands of lives annually, and the toll is not limited to soldiers. Civilians — those who were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time — find themselves swept into the storm. “Imagine being at a family picnic and having it interrupted by artillery fire. That’s no way to spend a Saturday!” Raf remarked dryly, emphasizing the absurdity of violence amid humanity’s gatherings.

But the scars of war run deeper than physical loss. The psychological impacts are profound and often overlooked. Soldiers return home carrying the invisible burdens of post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. “It’s like bringing a demonic AI home from work; you can’t just turn it off!” Raf lamented. He highlighted that the horrors of war haunt veterans and civilians alike, leaving a legacy of trauma that can echo through generations.

The emotional toll on children, especially those growing up in war zones, is particularly alarming. “You think kids have it rough with homework? Try growing up while bombs are falling!” Raf added, shaking his head in disbelief. The trauma these children endure can shape their futures, perpetuating cycles of violence and despair.

Then there is the economic fallout, which can feel as invisible as the psychological scars but is no less devastating. The funds poured into military campaigns could be better spent on education, healthcare, and infrastructure. “Let’s not forget the opportunity cost here,” Raf urged. “Imagine the roads we could build or the schools we could fund instead of financing yet another conflict.”

The irony is palpable: We invest billions in creating more sophisticated weapons while ignoring the very real problems we could solve with those resources. “It’s like spending all your money on a fancy coffee machine but not using it to make coffee. What’s the point?” he quipped.

Even our planet bears the scars of warfare. From bombings that raze forests to chemical weapons that poison water supplies, the environmental destruction wrought by conflict is catastrophic. “War is like a poorly designed AI: It doesn’t just affect the immediate environment; it disrupts the whole ecosystem,” Raf argued. “The trees don’t just fall; they take entire habitats with them. If we’re going to wage war, we’re also declaring war on the Earth itself.”

The irony is palpable: We invest billions in creating more sophisticated weapons while ignoring the very real problems we could solve with those resources.

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago

The consequences of this destruction are felt long after the fighting stops. Communities left with barren land and polluted water face dire challenges. “It’s a vicious cycle: War devastates, and the aftermath leaves people hungry and desperate,” he said.

Raf’s mantra — “Blood is not even useful for making mud” — serves as a stark reminder of the senselessness of war. “It’s a truth that echoes through history: Conflicts often end in stalemates or resolutions that could have been achieved through dialogue,” he pointed out. The philosopher Aristotle once said: “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” Yet, in war, we often accept the thought of violence without questioning its futility.

“Wouldn’t it be great if we could use all the energy we spend on fighting to solve our differences peacefully?” Raf proposed. “Imagine an AI that mediates disputes instead of escalating them. Now that’s the kind of machine we need!”

As Techville embraces the future of AI, Mr. Raf advocates for an ethical approach — one that learns from the past. “If we can’t teach AI to value human life, we might as well hand over the keys to a malfunctioning robot,” he cautioned. “We need to instill the values of diplomacy and cooperation in our technology.”

In this context, the role of the international community becomes crucial. “We must prioritize dialogue over military intervention,” Raf emphasized. By addressing root causes like poverty and inequality, we can create a world where conflicts are less likely to arise. “Investing in education and social justice is like teaching AI to be kind — it’s not easy, but it’s necessary.”

In a world increasingly defined by AI and technological advancement, it is our ethical responsibility to ensure that we do not repeat the mistakes of history. “Peace isn’t just a noble idea; it’s essential for our survival,” Raf declared.

As he concluded his talk, the crowd erupted in applause. “Let’s strive for a future where our conflicts are resolved through dialogue, and where human life is cherished above all else,” he urged. “After all, if we can’t learn from our past, how can we expect our machines to do better?”

In Techville, where the buzz of technology mingles with the echoes of history, Mr. Raf stands as a beacon of hope. He reminds us that as we navigate the ethical landscape of AI, the lessons of humanity must guide our way. With a wink, he added: “And maybe one day, we’ll look back and wonder why we ever thought war was a good idea in the first place!”

Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in Saudi Arabia and working at the Gulf Research Center.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Moyuka Uchijima is living a dream – at least that’s how she described it. 

Moyuka Uchijima is living a dream – at least that’s how she described it. 
Updated 2 min 38 sec ago
Follow

Moyuka Uchijima is living a dream – at least that’s how she described it. 

Moyuka Uchijima is living a dream – at least that’s how she described it. 
  • With a little help from Kei Nishikori, Moyuka Uchijima hits new heights in Madrid
  • Ons Jabeur’s conqueror reaches maiden WTA 1000 last-16

Moyuka Uchijima is living a dream – at least that’s how she described it. 

In the last few days at the Madrid Open, the Japanese world No. 56 defeated her favorite player Ons Jabeur in the second round before claiming the first top-10 win of her career over world No. 3 Jessica Pegula on Sunday. 

This time last year, Uchijima was ranked 130 in the world, which wasn’t high enough for her to get into the draw in Madrid. 

She was instead grinding on the lower-level ITF circuit, and about to go on a 15-match winning streak, sweeping three consecutive titles – in Japan, Slovakia, and Spain – in as many weeks. 

That run earned her a place in the top 100 for the first time, and the 23-year-old hasn’t looked back since, rising to a career-high 51 in the world earlier this month. 

With wins against Robin Montgomery, and 2022 Madrid finalists Jabeur and Pegula, Uchijima punched her ticket to the last-16 stage at a WTA 1000 tournament for the first time. She’ll take on 21st-seeded Ekaterina Alexandrova for a place in the quarterfinals on Monday evening. 

“I'm just really, really happy. It's my first Masters 1000 round of 16, and I still cannot believe it, I'm in a dream kind of,” Uchijima said in an interview with Arab News and wtatennis.com. 

“I know Jessica is a really, really great player, so I was just really happy to share a court with her, but to get a win is something really, really special for me.”

Uchijima entered her third round against Pegula with a 0-6 record against top-10 opposition, including a tight third-set tiebreak loss to Coco Gauff in Indian Wells last month. 

She lost in similar fashion to a 15th-ranked Mirra Andreeva at the Australian Open early in the year. 

Those two close defeats gave Uchijima the belief she was at the same level as these top players; she just needed to get over that final hump and close out victories. 

She did just that against Jabeur and Montgomery, rallying back from a set down, and was clinical in her straight-sets win over Pegula. 

“I just try not to think about the score, because when you think you have a chance, then you start to get nervous,” explained Uchijima. “So this week, I'm just trying to, even first round, I was getting killed by Robin Montgomery, she is also a great player; I just try not to think during the point too much and just enjoy the moment and just try to do what I can do at that moment.”

She added: “Ons is one of my favorite players, and I'm always watching her on TV.

“And Jessica as well. Obviously, they've always been on top in the WTA Tour, so it's kind of a dream that I'm playing against them and actually able to win some matches.”

Jabeur, the Tunisian former world No. 2, plays a unique brand of tennis that Uchijima finds particularly exciting to watch, albeit when she’s not on the receiving end of it. 

“It's just she's different,” said Uchijima. 

“She plays a style that is different than a lot of players, so I hate to play against her because she uses a lot of drop shots, so I have to run more, but to watch is really, really interesting because you don't see a lot of players like the way she plays, so it's just really fun to watch.”

Uchijima was born in Kuala Lumpur to a Japanese father and Malaysian mother. She moved around with her family for a few years before settling in Tokyo when she was around eight years old. 

On her way to elementary school every day, she would pass by a tennis court at her father Kazuto’s workplace. Uchijima did swimming and basketball at the time, but when she picked up tennis, she enjoyed it way more than the monotony of swim practice and the running drills in basketball. 

She forced her sister, who did ballet and gymnastics, to join her during tennis practice and was doing it for fun until she realized she was actually good at it by the age of 13. 

Uchijima’s current training base is Guangzhou, where she gets to spend her preseason hitting with the likes of Zheng Saiai and Zhu Lin. 

“A lot of those girls, they've been top 30, top 20, so they gave me a lot of tips, and they always support me from wherever,” she said. 

“We are far away from each other, maybe not playing the same tournament, but if we play the same tournament, we still support each other, and yeah, of course, my coaches, they're helping me a lot.”

This week in Madrid, Uchijima received some priceless advice from her compatriot Kei Nishikori, who she grew up watching and idolizing. The 35-year-old Nishikori is a former world No. 4 and the only man representing an Asian country to reach a Grand Slam final (US Open 2014). 

He contested the men’s tournament in Madrid this week, losing to Denis Shapovalov in the second round, and Uchijima cannot believe that after all these years, she gets to be at the same event as her idol. 

“We went to the Olympics together last year, so I got to know him more there,” said Uchijima. 

“I was watching him on TV, so it's just crazy, you're actually living the same life, same place. 

“I don't have a lot of experience here, playing in Madrid, where this a little bit of altitude, and a little bit different conditions, and Kei played here many, many years, and I think he was runner-up here (in 2014), so he gave me some tips. Actually, after the first round match, he gave me some tips, so I guess it's working.”

Years after Li Na and Nishikori paved the way, Japan’s Naomi Osaka exploded onto the scene, winning four Grand Slams and becoming Asia’s first ever singles world No. 1. 

More recently, China’s Zheng Qinwen reached the Australian Open final in 2024 and clinched the gold medal at the Paris Olympics. Filipina teenager Alex Eala made a historic run to the semifinals in Miami last month. 

Asian tennis is booming and Uchijima is keen to write her own chapter in its story. 

“I think it's a really, really great thing,” she said. 

“For me, I grew up watching Kei Nishikori and Naomi, for the most part, but yeah, Alex in Miami, what she has done was really, really incredible, and of course, I got a lot of motivation from her, and also from Olympics last year, when Zheng Qinwen won the gold, first Asian to win a gold. 

“So yeah, of course, I got a motivation from her that even we can do it, so I don't know, hopefully, I can be a little part of it, and give some dreams for the younger players, not only in Japan, maybe in Asia. Because that's how I look up, watching Kei and Naomi, so I can hope I can do the same for the younger generation.”

Uchijima grew up playing on hard courts and artificial grass in Japan but says she started to find her game on clay last season and realized the red dirt is probably the most suited to her playing style. 

With a quarterfinal spot on the line for Uchijima on Monday, she’s focusing on the task at hand and doesn’t want to get distracted by her achievements so far at the Caja Magica. 

“It gave me confidence, but there's a lot of things still I can improve from today's match, so just trying to improve day by day,” she said. 

After competing at a lower-level tournament at a different site in Madrid 12 months ago, Uchijima’s time at the WTA 1000 in the Spanish capital this week has been a significant upgrade. 

“Good food, good courts, a good facility – I'm just enjoying it and everything,” she says with a smile.


Joaquin Niemann wins LIV Golf Mexico City with stellar final round

Joaquin Niemann wins LIV Golf Mexico City with stellar final round
Updated 28 April 2025
Follow

Joaquin Niemann wins LIV Golf Mexico City with stellar final round

Joaquin Niemann wins LIV Golf Mexico City with stellar final round
  • Niemann began his day two shots off the lead, but three birdies on his first seven holes put him in an enviable position

Joaquin Niemann was virtually flawless Sunday, firing a 6-under-par 65 at Club de Golf Chapultepec to earn his third championship of the season at LIV Golf Mexico City.
Niemann began his day two shots off the lead, but three birdies on his first seven holes put him in an enviable position. He added birdies on Nos. 10, 12, 16 and 18 to finish three strokes in front of the field at 16 under for the tourney.
The win came in front of family and friends.
“Yeah, it’s special,” Niemann said. “My mom came all the way. I think the first time my mom has seen me win, so that’s pretty cool. So yeah, I had my mom here, Didi, my wife, my friends, my team. It’s been a really good couple months, so yeah, happy.”
The Torque GC captain from Chile had one bogey, on the 14th.
Following his third tournament win, Niemann remains in the lead for the individual season-long championship, a title that narrowly evaded him in 2024 as he finished second to Jon Rahm.
He also locked in a spot at the US Open in June.
“Yeah, it’s nice,” Niemann said. “I feel like I wanted to be there (at the US Open), so yeah, it’s great to keep doing what I’m doing, hitting the ball great, making putts, and yeah, hopefully keep it rolling.”
The 26-year-old was barely pressed late, with the best charge coming from the incredible round turned in by Ripper GC’s Lucas Herbert, a 10-under 61 beauty that featured an eagle and eight birdies.
Herbert essentially ran out of runway to complete the comeback, coming into the day too far behind the leaders to catch up. However, he did help Cameron Smith’s (72) Ripper squad finish in second in the team standings, behind Jon Rahm’s (68) Legion XIII.
“Just one of those rounds where everything comes together,” Herbert said. “I thought I played pretty decent the last two days, I just didn’t get many breaks, and I just felt like today every time there was a line ball sort of thing I got the right kick and I’d make a putt where I needed to or just anything — just that sort of stuff. It just kept the momentum going through the round.
“Look, I played great, really enjoyed feeling everything I felt the last few holes, but it’s just one of those rounds where it all just clicks for you, and it was a pretty cool feeling to do it at an event like this.”
Bryson DeChambeau, leading the pack coming into the day, was attempting to go wire-to-wire but came up well short with a final-round 71 and had to settle for a tie for second with Herbert at 13 under.
Rahm was fourth among individuals at 12 under, while Smith and Legion’s Tyrrell Hatton (68) finished in a tie for fifth (11 under).
“It’s pretty hard to make it more special than this moment right now,” Niemann said. “I mean, this place is amazing. It was a good battle with Bryson, with Cam, so I’m happy to be in this position right now.”
Torque finished the tournament in third place, while 4Aces was fourth.


US says it struck 800 targets in Yemen, killed 100s of Houthis since March 15

US says it struck 800 targets in Yemen, killed 100s of Houthis since March 15
Updated 28 April 2025
Follow

US says it struck 800 targets in Yemen, killed 100s of Houthis since March 15

US says it struck 800 targets in Yemen, killed 100s of Houthis since March 15
  • Washington’s forces have hammered the Houthis with air strikes since March 15, seeking to end the threat they pose to vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

WASHINGTON: The United States has hit more than 800 targets in Yemen since mid-March, killing hundreds of Houthi rebel fighters, including members of the group’s leadership, the US military said Sunday.
Washington’s forces have hammered the Houthis with near-daily air strikes since March 15 in an operation dubbed “Rough Rider,” seeking to end the threat they pose to vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden and reestablish US regional “deterrence.”
“Since the start of Operation Rough Rider, USCENTCOM has struck over 800 targets. These strikes have killed hundreds of Houthi fighters and numerous Houthi leaders,” the military command responsible for the Middle East said in a statement that provided its most detailed accounting of the operation so far.
“The strikes have destroyed multiple command-and-control facilities, air defense systems, advanced weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapons storage locations,” CENTCOM said.
Despite the strikes, the Houthis — who control large swaths of Yemen and have been at war with a Saudi-led coalition backing the internationally recognized government since 2015 — have continued to claim attacks against both US vessels and Israel.
CENTCOM said that “while the Houthis have continued to attack our vessels, our operations have degraded the pace and effectiveness of their attacks. Ballistic missile launches have dropped by 69 percent. Additionally, attacks from one-way attack drones have decreased by 55 percent.”
“Iran undoubtedly continues to provide support to the Houthis. The Houthis can only continue to attack our forces with the backing of the Iranian regime,” the military command said.
“We will continue to ratchet up the pressure until the objective is met, which remains the restoration of freedom of navigation and American deterrence in the region,” it added.
As the United States announced details on the latest round of its campaign against the Houthis, the rebel-controlled Al-Masirah TV reported that US strikes on the Yemeni capital Sanaa had killed at least eight people and wounded others.
Al-Masirah TV also broadcast footage of the rubble of destroyed homes and cars, as well as blood stains on the ground, while rescuers collected what appeared to be human remains in white cloth.
Earlier Sunday, Houthi media said overnight strikes on Sanaa had killed two people and wounded several more.
The latest strikes brings the death toll since March 15 to 228, according to an AFP tally based on Houthi announcements.
The Houthi rebels began targeting shipping in late 2023, claiming solidarity with Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, which has been devastated by a military campaign launched by Israel after a shock Hamas attack in October of that year.
Houthi attacks have prevented ships from passing through the Suez Canal — a vital route that normally carries about 12 percent of the world’s shipping traffic — forcing many companies into a costly detour around the tip of southern Africa.
The United States first began conducting strikes against the Houthis under the Biden administration, and President Donald Trump has vowed that military action against the rebels will continue until they are no longer a threat to shipping.
The Trump administration has been forced onto the political defensive during the Yemen campaign by scandals stemming from senior officials’ use of commercial messaging app Signal to discuss strikes that took place on March 15.
Last month, The Atlantic magazine revealed that its editor-in-chief was mistakenly included in a Signal chat in which officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, discussed the strikes.
US media outlets then reported earlier this month that Hegseth had shared information on the same strikes in a second Signal group chat with various people who would not normally be involved in such discussions, including his wife.


With the ‘Big Three’ era firmly behind us, will we ever witness that level of unrelenting dominance again in tennis?

With the ‘Big Three’ era firmly behind us, will we ever witness that level of unrelenting dominance again in tennis?
Updated 28 April 2025
Follow

With the ‘Big Three’ era firmly behind us, will we ever witness that level of unrelenting dominance again in tennis?

With the ‘Big Three’ era firmly behind us, will we ever witness that level of unrelenting dominance again in tennis?
  • Physicality of the game, increasingly taxing schedule, and tight competition level mean a wider pool of players are sharing the spoils at the big events 

It was standing room only at Carlos Alcaraz’s press conference last Wednesday at the Caja Magica, where the Spaniard announced he was withdrawing from the Madrid Open due to two separate injuries in his right and left legs. 

After winning Monte Carlo and reaching the final in Barcelona in consecutive weeks, playing 10 matches in 12 days, the four-time Grand Slam champion’s body had had enough. 

With the French Open just four weeks away, it made sense that Alcaraz would choose to sit out the Madrid Open and deal with his right adductor and left hamstring issues. 

Last year, a forearm injury limited Alcaraz to just one clay-court tournament in the build-up to the French Open, forcing him out of Monte Carlo, Barcelona and Rome. He still went on to triumph in Paris, defeating Alexander Zverev in the final of the French Open. 

The five biggest clay-court tournaments of the spring last season – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, Rome, and Roland Garros – were won by five different players. 

This clay swing so far, Alcaraz won Monte Carlo and Holger Rune won Barcelona. Neither will win Madrid this fortnight, with the former withdrawing from the tournament and the latter retiring one-set into his opener with a right knee injury on Friday. 

Long gone are the days where Rafael Nadal would routinely sweep four spring tournaments on the red clay – something he pulled off in nine different seasons. 

Or the years where Roger Federer would run away with the last three to five tournaments of the year, then start the new season with another undefeated stretch, like that time he built a 41-match winning streak that included seven consecutive titles from August 2006 to March 2007. 

Novak Djokovic once won the first 43 matches of the year (2011), suffering his first defeat of the season in the Roland Garros semi-finals early June. 

In 2015, the Serb swept Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo and Rome, before reaching the French Open final (notching 27 wins in a row), then won Wimbledon. He finished that season by winning the last five tournaments, clinching all silverware from the US Open onwards. 

That is just a glimpse of the kind of dominance the fabled ‘Big Three’ were able to demonstrate since they broke through on the professional circuit, all the way into their mid-30s. 

Those extended unbeaten runs they pulled off required stratospheric levels of mental and physical strength, and they did it so often we almost forgot how extraordinary it all was. 

As a new era in tennis unfolds, headlined by Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, it’s becoming more and more apparent just how difficult those long winning streaks put together by the ‘Big Three’ actually were. 

Both Sinner and Alcaraz have shown an incredibly high caliber of tennis from a young age and have been sharing the spoils at most of the big events since the start of last season. 

Sinner, who is currently serving a three-month antidoping ban, will return to action next month carrying a 21-match winning streak that started last October in Shanghai. 

Alcaraz went 14 matches unbeaten on two occasions, in 2022 and 2023. 

Still, it’s difficult to imagine the current generation producing the kind of runs we witnessed during the ‘Big Three’ era, for a number of reasons. 

Former world No. 1 Andy Murray, who is currently coaching Djokovic, believes extending ATP Masters 1000 events to 12-14 days as opposed to their typical one-week slots has made it harder for players to sweep such tournaments back-to-back. 

“I think just because of the longer events now, I think it's harder to do that,” Murray said in an interview with Arab News and Tennis Majors in Madrid this week. 

“I preferred how it was before because, it probably allowed you to play more matches in a condensed period, but then you had more time to rest and recover, whereas now the rest and recovery happens at tournaments and that's not the normal rest.

“Physically and mentally, it's not the same because you come into the courts, you practice, you're around lots of people.

“As much as I know it's nice like to be here playing but it's a stressful environment when you have lots of people and cameras and everything watching your practices rather than having a quiet environment where you can work on things and practice in peace is a bit different.”

Grigor Dimitrov was a ‘Big Three’ contemporary for many years and is still competing at a high level at the age of 33, currently ranked 16 in the world. 

The Bulgarian believes the tour right now is “taxing on the body”, irrespective of how old or young you are. 

“These two-week events, it's just difficult however you look at it and there's always going to be a moment where you just can't go on,” said the former world No. 3.  

“It's not because you're weak or anything like that, it's just you don't have it in you and I think each one of the players should, to a certain extent, recognize that and be very mindful of how they're positioning themselves in terms of scheduling their play.

“It's taxing on the body, I don't think there's any secrets around that, I think it's just purely the intensity of the competition and all that. It has changed over the course of whatever, the past 15 years, everything has changed. 

“However way you look at it, players have changed, now the different generation comes through, the tournaments are longer, physically everyone is pushing themselves more, the ball is faster, strings are different, racquets are different, so you know like overall everything kind of sped up a little bit and then what can you do?”

Frances Tiafoe doesn’t think players aren’t able to sweep multiple tournaments in a row regularly has anything to do with the taxing schedule or the physical and mental issues that can arise because of it. 

“I don't think it's a schedule thing. I just think it’s a level thing,” said the 27-year-old American. 

“I think the level is very similar, anybody can clip anybody on a given day. I think it's exciting times. Tennis reminds me of, right now, from 2000 to 2004 or 2005. It's a window. Anybody can win Slams. Anybody can win tournaments like this. We're going to have, probably every Masters (season), there’ll probably be eight, nine winners. I'm pretty sure. 

“Maybe Alcaraz and Sinner will probably get two or three. But it's an open game. I don't think anyone fears anyone. No one’s that much better than anyone, except Sinner and Alcaraz. I respect those two. But I think everybody else, if they're not playing well, they can lose.”

Tiafoe is happy to experience this kind of unpredictability on the tour. 

“I lived the ‘real era’. So for me, it feels great,” he added. 

“It feels great to know I can play quarters or semis, at a Slam and that's not like winning it, in a sense. Because, I'm 20, at the Australian Open (in 2019), I lose to Rafa in the quarters and in my mind, I’m like, I’m not beating Rafa. But now, you can play anyone. I really feel like at the Slams, anyone can win.”

World No. 4 Taylor Fritz believes “it’s possible” to witness wild winning streaks in this era but acknowledges the clay season is particularly tough, given the number of big events crammed within a short period of time. 

There are three Masters 1000 clay tournaments scheduled within a five-week window ahead of Roland Garros. 

“It speaks to how insane those guys (the ‘Big Three’) were, they could just play non-stop all the time. And it's tough to go back-to-back-to-back and just keep having big weeks, especially this time of the year, because there's a lot of big events all in a row,” said Fritz. 

“There aren’t necessarily good weeks in this time of the schedule to take off. So, yeah, this is a very tough part of the year to just win, win, win, win, win. But, I mean, it just speaks to how good those guys were I guess.”

Djokovic acknowledged that he, Federer and Nadal had some dominant stretches but played down how frequent those runs came about. 

When asked about Alcaraz’s withdrawal from Madrid, Djokovic was quick to note how young the Spaniard still is. Alcaraz turns 22 next week and is already a four-time major winner and an Olympics silver medallist.

“For me personally, that level of dominant tennis and achievements came when I was 23, 24 years old and then after that. So between, let's say, 23 and 33 is when it was really happening. And now Carlos is still not 23,” said the 37-year-old Djokovic, who as recently as 2023, started the season with a 15-0 run and swept Cincinnati, US Open, and the Paris Masters at the end of the year. 

“We have to remember that what he has done for his age is not also normal. I'm sure that we'll see a lot of him on the big stage with trophies in the future in, whatever, 10 years, 15 years, as long as he's playing.”

Djokovic believes it’s hard to compare eras, adding: “The last 20 years was dominated mostly by the four of us (including Andy Murray), and obviously when the three of my biggest rivals retired, you can feel there's a shift, not only in terms of the generations of players that are now, all of a sudden, the main focus and attention is on them.

“But it's just, I guess it takes a little bit of time for people to accept the fact that Roger and Rafa are not playing, and Murray, and I guess one day myself, but I'm still trying to stay there and represent the older guys, the older generation. Hopefully that brings a positive effect to the tournaments and to the tour itself.”


US in touch with India and Pakistan; urges work toward ‘responsible solution’

US in touch with India and Pakistan; urges work toward ‘responsible solution’
Updated 28 April 2025
Follow

US in touch with India and Pakistan; urges work toward ‘responsible solution’

US in touch with India and Pakistan; urges work toward ‘responsible solution’
  • India is an increasingly important US partner as Washington aims to counter China’s rising influence in Asia while Pakistan remains a US ally

WASHINGTON: The US State Department said on Sunday Washington was in touch with both India and Pakistan while urging them to work toward what it called a “responsible solution” as tensions have risen between the two Asian nations following a recent Islamist militant attack in Kashmir.
In public, the US government has expressed support for India after the attack but has not criticized Pakistan. India blamed Pakistan for the April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed over two dozen people. Pakistan denies responsibility and called for a neutral probe.
“This is an evolving situation and we are monitoring developments closely. We have been in touch with the governments of India and Pakistan at multiple levels,” a US State Department spokesperson told Reuters in an emailed statement.
“The United States encourages all parties to work together toward a responsible resolution,” the spokesperson added.
The State Department spokesperson also said Washington “stands with India and strongly condemns the terrorist attack in Pahalgam,” reiterating comments similar to recent ones made by President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
India is an increasingly important US partner as Washington aims to counter China’s rising influence in Asia while Pakistan remains a US ally even as its importance for Washington has diminished after the 2021 US withdrawal from neighboring Afghanistan.
Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst and writer for the Foreign Policy magazine, said India is now a much closer US partner than Pakistan.
“This may worry Islamabad that if India retaliates militarily, the US may sympathize with its counter-terrorism imperatives and not try to stand in the way,” Kugelman told Reuters.
Kugelman also said that given Washington’s involvement and ongoing diplomatic efforts in Russia’s war in Ukraine and Israel’s war in Gaza, the Trump administration is “dealing with a lot on its global plate” and may leave India and Pakistan on their own, at least in the early days of the tensions.
Hussain Haqqani, a former Pakistan ambassador to the US and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute think tank, also said that there seemed to be no US appetite to calm the situation at this moment.
“India has a longstanding grievance about terrorism emanating or supported from across border. Pakistan has a longstanding belief that India wants to dismember it. Both work themselves into a frenzy every few years. This time there is no US interest in calming things down,” Haqqani said.

ESCALATING TENSIONS
Muslim-majority Kashmir is claimed in full by both Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan who each rule over only parts of it and have previously fought wars over the Himalayan region.
Hindu nationalist Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed to pursue the attackers to “the ends of the earth” and said that those who planned and carried out the Kashmir attack “will be punished beyond their imagination.” Calls have also grown from Indian politicians and others for military action against Pakistan.
After the attack, India and Pakistan unleashed a raft of measures against each other, with Pakistan closing its airspace to Indian airlines and India suspending the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty that regulates water-sharing from the Indus River and its tributaries.
The two sides have also exchanged fire across their de facto border after four years of relative calm.
A little-known militant group, Kashmir Resistance, claimed responsibility for the attack in a social media message. Indian security agencies say Kashmir Resistance, also known as The Resistance Front, is a front for Pakistan-based militant organizations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen.
Ned Price, a former US State Department official under the administration of former President Joe Biden, said that while the Trump administration was giving this issue the sensitivity it deserves, a perception that it would back India at any cost may escalate tensions further.
“The Trump Administration has made clear it wishes to deepen the US-India partnership — a laudable goal — but that it is willing to do so at almost any cost. If India feels that the Trump Administration will back it to the hilt no matter what, we could be in store for more escalation and more violence between these nuclear-armed neighbors,” Price said.