South Korean parliament votes to allow tattooists to work without a medical license

South Korean parliament votes to allow tattooists to work without a medical license
The current restrictions traces back to a 1992 Supreme Court verdict that defined cosmetic tattoos as medical procedures, citing health issues that could be caused by tattoo needles and ink. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 25 September 2025
Follow

South Korean parliament votes to allow tattooists to work without a medical license

South Korean parliament votes to allow tattooists to work without a medical license
  • Tens of thousands of tattooists have been working in the shadows in South Korea for decades

SEOUL: South Korea’s parliament passed a landmark bill Thursday that would allow people to give tattoos without having a medical license.
The country currently allows only people with medical licenses to give tattoos, making it the only country in the industrialized world with such a restriction. Tens of thousands of tattooists have been working in the shadows in South Korea for decades.
The National Assembly passed the Tattooist Act by a 195-0 vote.
The Tattooist Act would introduce an official licensing system for tattooists and place them under state supervision. The act would take effect after a two-year grace period that begins once it’s formally proclaimed by President Lee Jae Myung. That step is considered a formality, as his Health Ministry has already expressed support for the measure.
The bill’s passage comes as public views toward tattoos are changing. In the past, tattoos were associated with gangsters or criminals, but they are now increasingly perceived as a form of self-expression, with K-pop idols and other celebrities openly displaying tattoos.
The current restrictions traces back to a 1992 Supreme Court verdict that defined cosmetic tattoos as medical procedures, citing health issues that could be caused by tattoo needles and ink. Authorities don’t aggressively enforce the rules, allowing tattooists to thrive in the shadows.


Lebanese woman fired from work after replying to post by Israeli military’s spokesman

Lebanese woman fired from work after replying to post by Israeli military’s spokesman
Updated 07 November 2025
Follow

Lebanese woman fired from work after replying to post by Israeli military’s spokesman

Lebanese woman fired from work after replying to post by Israeli military’s spokesman
  • Sarah Shayah replied to IDF’s spokesman Avichay Adraee, saying, ‘Baalbek when?’
  • Lawyer tells Arab News that interacting via social media with any Israeli is ‘against the Lebanese penal code’

BEIRUT: A Lebanese employee was fired from her job with immediate effect after her reply to a post by the Israeli military’s spokesman on X triggered a social media uproar.
Shortly after the Israel Defense Forces’ Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee posted on X evacuation orders for residents of southern villages on Thursday, Lebanese citizen Sarah Shayah replied, saying: “Baalbek when?”
Without any clear indication as to what she meant by her reply, many social media users lashed out at Shayah, accusing her of communicating with Israelis and calling for her prosecution.
Others saw her reply as a joke or a simple error that should not have been taken so seriously.

Screenshot taken from social media shows Lebanese citizen Sarah Shayah’s reply to IDF’s Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee’s post on X on Thursday. (Social Media)

According to Lebanese media, Shayah was an employee at the non-profit Lebanese Organization for Studies and Training.
LOST’s President Dr. Rami Al-Lakkis was quoted as telling Annahar newspaper that Shayah was immediately dismissed from her job. Citing a breach of the organization’s established procedures and regulations, Al-Lakkis emphasized that her actions constituted a violation of Lebanese laws, as they are considered communication with the enemy.
A lawyer specialized in criminal law told Arab News on Friday that interacting via social media with any Israeli is “against the Lebanese penal code.”
The lawyer, who requested anonymity, said: “A person who replies, retweets, or interacts with any social media account of any Israeli national is considered a form of communication with the enemy. If found guilty, a suspect could face no less than one year in jail.”
No confirmation could be obtained as to whether any legal action had been initiated against Shayah by the time this article was published.