Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension

Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension
Microsoft workers occupy HQ in protest against company’s ties to Israeli military. (File/No Azure for Apartheid group)
Short Url
Updated 27 September 2025
Follow

Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension

Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension
  • Tech giant halts Israeli access to some technologies linked to mass surveillance of Palestinians
  • Campaign group steps up protests against Microsoft, demanding a ‘digital arms embargo’

LONDON: Human rights groups and activists welcomed Microsoft’s suspension of Israeli military access to some technologies linked to mass surveillance of Palestinians, urging the company to go further and end all contracts with Israel.

The decision, announced by Microsoft President Brad Smith on Thursday, followed an investigation by The Guardian, +972 Magazine, and Local Call, which revealed that Unit 8200, Israel’s spy agency, used Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to store and process vast amounts of Palestinian phone calls in Gaza and the West Bank as part of a mass surveillance program.

Microsoft said it acted after reviewing the reports and had blocked the unit’s access to some cloud storage and AI services.

Agnes Callamard, secretary-general of Amnesty International, urged the tech giant to investigate all its other dealings with the Israeli military to ensure they do not contribute to Israel’s “human rights violations against Palestinians.”

She urged other tech companies to suspend similar technology and military sales and called for accountability as Israel’s campaign in Gaza continues to cause mass civilian casualties, displacement and famine.

“There must be an end to the impunity that Israel has enjoyed and flouted,” said Callamard, urging states to “live up to their legal obligations toward bringing Israel’s genocide.”

The worker-led “No Azure for Apartheid” campaign group, which has lately escalated protests against Microsoft for its ties with Israel, welcomed the partial suspension but said it was “insufficient.”

The group reiterated its call for a complete suspension of Microsoft’s ties with the Israeli military and vowed to continue protests until that demand is met.

“We know that this is not enough,” Hossam Nasr, one of the group’s organizers, told Arab News.

“Microsoft has only disabled a small subset of services to only one unit in the Israeli military. The vast majority of Microsoft’s contract with the Israeli military remains intact.”

He said continuing ties with the military while it carries out its relentless campaign in Gaza is “unconscionable and morally indefensible for Microsoft.”

Nasr, a former Microsoft employee who was fired last year for holding an “unauthorized” vigil for Palestinian victims of Gaza, was one of seven protesters arrested after staging a a sit-in at the office of the Microsoft president in Washington. He said Microsoft’s suspension of some cloud services to Unit 8200, one month after the sit-in and repeated protests, demonstrated that the company had yielded to pressure.

Nasr said that although Microsoft’s response was “inadequate,” it marked the first instance of a US technology company halting the sale of certain services to the Israeli military “since the start of Gaza genocide.”

The campaign group, which gathered over 2,000 signatures from Microsoft employees and held demonstrations outside the company’s Washington headquarters last month, described its demand as part of a broader push for a “digital arms embargo” in parallel with weapons embargoes being imposed by governments worldwide.

In his official statement on Thursday, Smith said investigations were continuing.

Despite the suspension, he said that the company will continue to provide cybersecurity support to Israel and regional partners under existing agreements.


White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
Updated 01 November 2025
Follow

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
  • Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press, near the president's office
  • he policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon 

WEST PALM BEACH: US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday barred reporters from accessing part of the White House press office without an appointment, citing the need to protect “sensitive material.”
Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press — which is where Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s office is located and is near the Oval Office.
Reporters have until now been able to freely visit the area, often wandering up to try to speak to Leavitt or senior press officers to seek information or confirm stories.
Media are still allowed to access the area known as “Lower Press,” next to the famed White House briefing room, where more junior press officers have their desks, the memo said.
The policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon that major outlets including AFP refused to sign earlier this month.
The change at the White House was announced by the National Security Council in a memorandum titled “protecting sensitive material from unauthorized disclosure in Upper Press.”
“This memorandum directs the prohibition of press passholders from accessing... ‘Upper Press,’ which is situated adjacent to the Oval Office, without an appointment,” said the memo, addressed to Leavitt and White house Communications Director Steven Cheung.
“This policy will ensure adherence to best practices pertaining to access to sensitive material.”
It said the change was necessary because White House press officers were now routinely dealing with sensitive materials following “recent structural changes to the National Security Council.”
Trump has gutted the once powerful NSC, putting it under the control of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz was reassigned in May following a scandal over the use of the Signal app to plan strikes on Yemen.
Trump’s administration has made a major shake-up to access rules for journalists since his return to power in January.
Many mainstream outlets have seen their access to areas like the Oval Office and Air Force One reduced, while right-wing, Trump-friendly outlets have been given more prominence.
The White House also banned the Associated Press news agency from key areas where Trump speaks after it refused to recognize his order changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.