Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears

Demonstrators protest in solidarity with Palestinians, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in London. (Reuters)
Demonstrators protest in solidarity with Palestinians, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in London. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 15 October 2025
Follow

Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears

Pro-Palestine activists in Britain have bank account closed amid crackdown fears
  • John Nicholson, 70, and Norma Turner, 86, are treasurer and chair of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine
  • ‘This kind of behaviour has just never happened in our lifetime of activism before, and is suddenly happening to activists and to organisations and to people’

LONDON: A retired British couple who took part in local pro-Palestine activist have had their joint bank account closed without explanation, The Guardian reported.

John Nicholson, 70, and Norma Turner, 86, are treasurer and chair, respectively, of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine, which also had its bank account with Virgin Money frozen.

The couple said that their personal account with Yorkshire Building Society was used as a nest egg.

They received the full balance of the account via check after being informed of its closure.

Nicholson, a retired immigration barrister, and Turner, a former nurse, received a letter on Sept. 27 in which they were told that their account, which was opened about five years ago, would close on Sept. 30. 

“Neither of us​ have never been in financial difficulties, never been in debt​, (other than) mortgages, but paid those off. Never had any criminal ​record, fraud or anything​ of that sort of whatsoever,” Nicholson said.

“This is just inexplicable and, obviously, it’s not inexplicable because it’s to do with Palestine. It’s as simple as that but it’s inexplicable in that this was an amount of money we’ve got from retirement, put into a savings account, rolled it forward in a fixed-term bond, when that finished, rolled it forward in another one.

Yorkshire Building Society had, one month ago, “accepted quite happily” for the couple to roll forward the fix-term bond again, Nicholson said, adding that the account had no transactions.

He added: “This kind of behaviour has just never happened in our lifetime of activism before, and is suddenly happening to activists and to organisations and to people. If it isn’t Palestine, then why doesn’t YBS say what reason it is?”

The bank account of GMFP was frozen without explanation on July 10, five days after the banning of Palestine Action.

The Manchester organization had no connection with the proscribed group, sparking fears of a broader coordinated crackdown on pro-Palestinian activism in Britain.

The publicly listed activities of GMFP include letter-writing, individual consumer boycotting, leafleting, social media output, widespread protests and direct action.

A separate member of GMFP, also a signatory to the organization’s bank account, had their personal account frozen, too, but wished to remain anonymous.

Nicholson said: “We’ve absolutely no other idea of why anything could have happened to us other than (our pro-Palestinian activism) because that is pretty much the only thing that we’re doing in our lives at the moment.

“And then the ban came in on Palestine Action and we know that other people are having their bank accounts frozen,” he added, referring to the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

The SPSC had its account with Unity Trust bank frozen in June, apparently due to its website featuring a button to donate to Palestine Action before the group’s banning.

However, despite the button being removed after proscription, the account remains frozen.

YBS, Virgin Money and Unity Trust bank all declined to comment on individual cases when approached by The Guardian.

A spokesperson for the former said: “We never close savings accounts based on different opinions or beliefs. Accounts are closed only in very rare circumstances, with decisions made on the basis of the specific facts of the case.”


UN says 2025 to be among top three warmest years on record

UN says 2025 to be among top three warmest years on record
Updated 07 November 2025
Follow

UN says 2025 to be among top three warmest years on record

UN says 2025 to be among top three warmest years on record
  • Mean near-surface temperature during the first eight months of 2025 stood at 1.42C above the pre-industrial average, says WMO
  • Impact of temperature rises can be seen in the Arctic sea ice extent, which after the winter freeze this year was the lowest ever recorded

GENEVA:  An alarming streak of exceptional temperatures has put 2025 on course to be among the hottest years ever recorded, the United Nations said Thursday, insisting though that the trend could still be reversed.
While this year will not surpass 2024 as the hottest recorded, it will rank second or third, capping more than a decade of unprecedented heat, the UN’s weather and climate agency said, capping more .
Meanwhile concentrations of greenhouse gases grew to new record highs, locking in more heat for the future, the World Meteorological Organization warned in a report released as dozens of world leaders met in the Brazilian Amazon ahead of next week’s COP30 UN climate summit.
Together, the developments “mean that it will be virtually impossible to limit global warming to 1.5C in the next few years without temporarily overshooting the Paris Agreement target,” WMO chief Celeste Saulo told leaders in Belem in northern Brazil.
The 2015 Paris climate accords aimed to limit global warming to well below two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels — and to 1.5C if possible.
Saulo insisted in a statement that while the situation was dire, “the science is equally clear that it’s still entirely possible and essential to bring temperatures back down to 1.5C by the end of the century.”
Surface heat
UN chief Antonio Guterres called the missed temperature target a “moral failure.”
Speaking at a Geneva press conference, WMO’s climate science chief Chris Hewitt stressed that “we don’t yet know how long we would be above 1.5 degrees.”
“That very much depends on decisions that are made now... So that’s one of the big challenges of COP30.”
But the world remains far off track.
Already, the years between 2015 and 2025 will individually have been the warmest since observations began 176 years ago, WMO said.
And 2023, 2024 and 2025 figure at the very top of that ranking.
The WMO report said that the mean near-surface temperature — about two meters (six feet) above the ground — during the first eight months of this year stood at 1.42C above the pre-industrial average.
At the same time, concentrations of heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and ocean heat content continued to rise, up from 2024’s already record levels, it found.
In its annual report on Tuesday, the UN Environment Programme also confirmed that emissions of greenhouse gases increased by 2.3 percent last year, growth driven by India followed by China, Russia and Indonesia.

 ‘Urgent action’ 

The WMO said the impact of temperature rises can be seen in the Arctic sea ice extent, which after the winter freeze this year was the lowest ever recorded.
The Antarctic sea ice extent meanwhile tracked well below average throughout the year, it said.
The UN agency also highlighted numerous weather and climate-related extreme events during the first eight months of 2025, from devastating flooding to brutal heat and wildfires, with “cascading impacts on lives, livelihoods and food systems.”
In this context, the WMO hailed “significant advances” in early warning systems, which it stressed were “more crucial than ever.”
Since 2015, it said, the number of countries reporting such systems had more than doubled, from 56 to 119.
It hailed in particular progress among the world’s least developed countries and small island developing states, which showed a five-percent hike in access in the past year alone.
However, it lamented that 40 percent of the world’s countries still no such early warning systems.
“Urgent action is needed to close these remaining gaps,” it said.