UK’s Prince Andrew says giving up royal title

UK’s Prince Andrew says giving up royal title
Britain’s Prince Andrew reacts at the end of the Requiem Mass, on the day of the funeral of Britain’s Katharine, Duchess of Kent, at Westminster Cathedral in London, Sept. 16, 2025. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 17 October 2025
Follow

UK’s Prince Andrew says giving up royal title

UK’s Prince Andrew says giving up royal title
  • He said his decision came after discussions with his brother, King Charles III, and his own “immediate and wider family“
  • He said “we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family“

LONDON: Prince Andrew of Britain on Friday renounced his title of Duke of York and other honors after being increasingly embroiled in scandals around his ties to US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“I will... no longer use my title or the honors which have been conferred upon me,” Andrew, 65, said in a statement.
He said his decision came after discussions with his brother, King Charles III, and his own “immediate and wider family.”
“I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first,” he said.
He again denied all allegations, but said “we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family.”
Andrew, who stepped back from public life in 2019, will remain a prince, as he is the second son of the late queen Elizabeth II.
But he will no longer hold the title of Duke of York that she had conferred on him.
His ex-wife Sarah Ferguson will also no longer use the title of Duchess of York, though his daughters Beatrice and Eugenie remain princesses.
The bombshell announcement came after new allegations emerged this week in the posthumous memoir of Virginia Giuffre, the woman at the center of the Epstein scandal.
She wrote that Andrew had behaved as if having sex with her was his “birthright.”
In “Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,” Giuffre said she had sex with Andrew on three separate occasions including when she was under 18.
Giuffre rose to public prominence after alleging the disgraced US financier Epstein used her as a sex slave and that Andrew had assaulted her.
Andrew has repeatedly denied Giuffre’s accusations and avoided trial by paying a multimillion-dollar settlement.
In extracts published by The Guardian this week, Giuffre describes meeting the prince in London in March 2001 when she was 17.
Andrew was allegedly challenged to guess her age, which he did correctly, adding by way of explanation: “My daughters are just a little younger than you.”

- ‘Entitled’ -

Giuffre and Andrew later went to the Tramp nightclub in London, where she said he was “sort of a bumbling dancer, and I remember he sweated profusely.”
They later returned to the London house of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s associate and former girlfriend, where they had sex, she alleged.
“He was friendly enough, but still entitled — as if he believed having sex with me was his birthright,” Giuffre wrote.
Giuffre, a US and Australian citizen, took her own life at her farm in Western Australia on April 25.
Andrew’s association with Epstein has left his reputation in tatters and made him a source of embarrassment to the king.
In a devastating 2019 television interview, Andrew — once feted as a handsome war hero who served as a helicopter pilot in the Falklands War — denied ever meeting Giuffre and defended his friendship with Epstein.


Early release granted to Bosnian Croat war criminal

Bruno Stojic. (Supplied)
Bruno Stojic. (Supplied)
Updated 59 min 27 sec ago
Follow

Early release granted to Bosnian Croat war criminal

Bruno Stojic. (Supplied)
  • “The gravity of Stojic’s crimes is high and weighs against granting early release. However, there are a number of positive factors that weigh in favor of early release,” she noted

THE HAGUE: A United Nations court on Monday granted early release to a former Bosnian Croat defense minister convicted of war crimes, including murdering and deporting Muslims in Bosnia in the early 1990s.
The International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, based in The Hague, ordered Bruno Stojic released from detention in Austria to return to Croatia.
The 70-year-old had behaved well in prison, admitted the gravity of his crimes and was unlikely to reoffend, said presiding judge Graciela Gatti Santana in her decision.
“The gravity of Stojic’s crimes is high and weighs against granting early release. However, there are a number of positive factors that weigh in favor of early release,” she noted.
She cited “acceptance of personal responsibility for the crimes,” “expression of regret for the consequences” of his actions, “very good behavior in prison” and “good prospects of successful reintegration.”

Stojic was sentenced to 20 years in jail in 2013 along with former Bosnian Croat President Jadranko Prlic and four others.
He had already surrendered to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in April 2004. His sentence was due to expire in September 2027.
In 2013, when convicting Stojic and the others, judge Jean-Claude Antonetti said they had aimed to establish reunification with Croatia.
To achieve that, they wanted to “modify the ethnic composition” of the land claimed by Bosnian Croats.
This, Antonetti said, they achieved by force, intimidation and terror “by conducting mass arrests of Bosnian Muslims who were then either murdered, beaten, sexually assaulted, robbed of their property and otherwise abused.”
The bloody 1992-1995 war in Bosnia mainly pitted Bosnian Muslims against Bosnian Serbs, but for a period also saw vicious fighting between Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats. Some 100,000 people lost their lives in the conflict.
In 1992, the Bosnian Croats established a Croatian entity, known as the HVO, which was both an army and a government. In August 1993, they proclaimed the Croatian “state” of Herceg-Bosna in Bosnia.
Stojic was encouraged to “continue, even following his early release, to reflect on his conduct and responsibility and to consider concrete steps he could take to facilitate reconciliation,” according to the court statement.