Terror outfits and their agendas

Terror outfits and their agendas
Updated 06 June 2014 21:59
Follow

Terror outfits and their agendas

Terror outfits and their agendas

I find it very strange that most of the self-appointed custodians of faith like Al-Qaeda, Tehreek-e-Taleban Pakistan (TTP) and Boko Haram have only helped “imperialist” forces further their agendas in their countries of origin. I usually don’t subscribe to the views expressed by experts who are known for weaving conspiracy theories. However, after carefully studying the pattern and the way in which these extremist organizations carry out their activities, I am forced to look into this issue from a different perspective. Al-Qaeda paved the way for US invasion of Afghanistan.
To many people, Afghanistan is a poor country known for its rugged terrain and tribal infightings. The truth, however, is otherwise. In addition to its strategic location, this landlocked country is rich in mineral resources. The TTP’s activities prompted the US forces to carry out drone attacks and other activities in Pakistan, a country though small in size but great in potential. Similar is the case with Boko Haram and Nigeria. These days Boko Haram is continuously making the headlines. This group claims to be the torchbearer of Islamic values but its acts are in contrast with the pristine teachings of Islam. If it were not for political and economic instability, Nigeria could emerge as one of the richest and most powerful countries of the Dark Continent.
All the actions of Boko Haram are simply inviting some kind of foreign intervention in the garb of maintaining law and order in the country. It is indeed sad. Followers of these organizations may be Muslims but don’t represent Islam. Their actions only brings a bad name to Islam and give so-called critics of Islam a chance to portray our religion in a negative light. If we study these “foreign interventions,” it will dawn on us that most of these actions are propelled by hyper-capitalism. Why are the powers that be not keen on making any decisive move in Syria? Maybe, they have little to gain from a stable Syria. Maybe an unstable Syria — which will result in an unstable Middle East — suits their aspirations. — Lala, Jeddah